Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

PreviousDocument #1875Next

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031433.txt

Why This Matters

The document appears to be an email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E.

AI-Generated Summary

The document appears to be an email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. regarding allegations of sexual harassment. In the emails, Krauss denies having sex with someone and explains that they mutually decided against it. He also mentions his position as Director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University and provides contact information for himself and others in his office.

Document Content

File Type: TXT

View File

Related Documents

EFTA00032998-p-5.jpg

The image shows a postcard that appears to be used for voting purposes. The postcard is addressed to "J. Epstein" and includes handwritten notes on the front side. There's also a stamp visible in the upper right corner with the words "Election Mail." The text on the postcard, partially obscured by handwriting, mentions "Important Election Reminders" and provides dates of "Nov 3, 2020" and "Dec 8, 2020." Additionally, there's a red stamp indicating that the postcard is to be sent "Return Service Requested." The handwriting includes some initials next to the name "J. Epstein" on the front of the postcard, possibly indicating the sender or recipient's confirmation.

Election MailImportant Election RemindersReturn Service Requested+19 more

EFTA00032998-p-3.jpg

The image is a split screen photo with two distinct images placed side by side. On the left side, there's an empty white space that could represent a blank page or a section for writing or drawing. The right side features a vintage-style illustration of a couple seated at a dining table. The man and woman appear to be sharing a romantic moment, with the man holding out a flower to the woman, who is leaning over slightly towards him in what might be interpreted as an affectionate gesture. Both individuals are dressed in formal attire, suggesting a special occasion or upscale setting.

formidspa+10 more

EFTA00009116-p-038.jpg

The image is a photograph of a handwritten document with the heading "For that the U.S. Justice Department believes that India was involved in the assassination of former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi" followed by a list numbered from 1 to 26, with text underneath each number. The text under each point is too small and blurry to read clearly. There are also some visible texts at the top right corner of the page, but they're not entirely legible due to the angle of the photo and the quality of the image.

Justice DepartmentIndian Prime Minister RajivJustice+10 more

EFTA00009116-p-026.jpg

The image is a photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The notes are organized into numbered sections and appear to be related to an interview or discussion as indicated by the text in each section such as "Questions", "Answers", and "Follow-up questions". Some of the visible words include "interview", "Washington", and "defence". The writing is in black ink and the paper has a slight shadow on one side, suggesting it's lying flat on a surface. The style of the image is straightforward with no additional context or embellishments provided.

QuestionsAnswersFollow+6 more

EFTA00009016-p-096.jpg

The image displays a black and white document with printed text on lined paper. The text appears to be from a legal proceeding or testimony given under oath, as indicated by the phrase "Under Oath" near the top of the page. Below that heading are numbered paragraphs containing questions and answers. One question reads: "Q Did you ever have any discussions with Mr. Philips about whether it is really appropriate for someone in his position to be attending meetings at the home of a lobbyist? A No, not really." The document also contains handwritten annotations in blue ink. These annotations include underlining certain words and phrases, making corrections or additions, and crossing out some text. There's a checkmark next to one of the handwritten changes, which might indicate approval or agreement with the amendment. The quality of the image is not high-resolution, making it difficult to read all the fine details.

Under OathUnderOath+10 more