Documents tagged "Background"
Found 131 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00025871.jpg
The image is a digital screenshot of an email notification from the American Medical Association (AMA) regarding updates to the Virtual Background section of its website. The text within the email reads "Virtual Background Update" and contains details about a new feature being added to AMA's online presence. The overall appearance of the email is typical of professional communication, using plain colors for background and text contrast. There are no visible people or locations in the image as it focuses solely on the textual content of the email notification.
DOJ-OGR-00021796.jpg
The image displays a page of legal documents with various texts and sections labeled as "Introduction" and "Background." The document appears to be related to a case or court proceedings, referencing dates such as "December 2014" and "Page 29" along with the name "Johnson." There is also text indicating that the document is from "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York." The style of the image suggests it is a digital representation or scan of an official court or legal report, written in English.
DOJ-OGR-00021731.jpg
The image displays a printed page of what appears to be an academic paper or document from a conference proceeding. The text is too small and blurry to read clearly, but it seems to contain paragraphs with headings such as "Background" and sections that might include references or examples. At the bottom right corner, there's a red stamp or mark, but its content is not legible due to the image quality. The style of the document suggests it could be from an academic conference or professional publication where authors present research or discuss topics within their field.
DOJ-OGR-00021649.jpg
The image displays a printed document with a table of contents. At the top, the title reads "Table of Contents" and below that is a list of numbered sections with titles such as "Executive Summary," "Background Information," etc. The text within each section appears to be in black ink on white paper. The style of the document suggests it might be an official report or publication. There are no images or illustrations visible; only textual information and page headings are present.
DOJ-OGR-00021474.jpg
The image is a low-resolution photograph of a document with printed text. Due to the resolution and angle of the photo, it's difficult to read all the text clearly. However, there are visible headings such as "Executive Summary" and subheadings like "Background" and "Discussion." The document appears to be related to environmental or ecological issues, possibly a report or policy paper, given the structure suggested by these headings. There's no discernible person or location in this image, and the focus is solely on the textual content of the document.
DOJ-OGR-00002890.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document from the United States Court of Appeals. The heading "COURT OF APPEALS" is prominently displayed at the top, along with a red header that includes what seems to be an official stamp and possibly the court's logo or seal. Below this are two lines of text, which could indicate the case number and other identifying details of the legal proceeding. The body of the document contains more text, including section headings such as "Background" and "Discussion," suggesting that it is a formal legal document containing sections of arguments or points of law in relation to a court case. The style of the image suggests it's meant for official legal records and not decorative purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029416.txt
Radar Online LLC is suing the Federal Bureau of Investigation for not releasing records related to its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the FBI has withheld these records despite a properly filed Freedom of Information Act request. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet based in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.txt
The document is a complaint filed by Radar Online LLC against the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint seeks to compel the FBI to produce records concerning its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet, while the FBI is a component of the Department of Justice. The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B), with venue being appropriate under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) as Radar's principal place of business is New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022277.txt
The National Labor Relations Board issued a final rule requiring employers to post notices informing employees of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act. The board believes that many employees are unaware of their rights under the statute and that the rule will increase knowledge of the NLRA among employees, in order to better enable the exercise of rights under the statute. The final rule establishes the size, form, and content of the notice, and sets forth provisions regarding the enforcement of the rule. The rule will be effective on November 14, 2011.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019448.txt
The document is a business proposal for CEFOTAJ in Haiti, focusing on supporting private industry to achieve economic independence from foreign aid. The proposal highlights the need for sustainable employment and training to develop an industry capable of providing a catalyst for growth and overcoming negative stigmas associated with Haiti's past. It also emphasizes the country's potential despite its ongoing challenges and reliance on donor countries, noting that secondary data was used in the plan based on academic, government, news resources, and expertise from individuals experienced in dealing with Haiti.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017904.txt
The document discusses a court case regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The plaintiffs brought actions against various entities and individuals alleged to have provided support to the terrorist organization responsible for the attacks or its members and associates. The District Court held that several defendants were entitled to immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and that other allegations in the complaint failed to state a claim under certain laws.