Documents tagged "Case"
Found 428 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-28.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a series of questions and answers related to a legal case. The text on the paper has been redacted, covering up sensitive information and keeping it confidential. The layout suggests that this could be part of a deposition or an interview transcript where each question is followed by its corresponding answer, but the content is not visible in this image due to the redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-27.jpg
The image displays a typed document with handwritten annotations and corrections on the right side. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the heading "INTERVIEW OF WITNESS" followed by a date and the name of an individual, which is redacted. Below this title, there are sections labeled A through D, each containing numbered questions with corresponding answers. Section A starts with question 16 asking about the witness's knowledge of someone named "Peterson" who reportedly has access to a building on East 3rd Street. The handwritten annotations next to this question and others in section A highlight specific points or clarify certain responses. The document seems to be a record of an interview conducted as part of legal investigation, possibly related to a real estate case given the references to properties and individuals associated with them.
EFTA00008920-p-24.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten content. It appears to be a page from a legal case summary or notes taken during an interview or court proceeding. The page contains multiple numbered points with handwritten text that seems to be related to witness statements or questions asked. Some of the text includes phrases like "wasn't there", "in my car", "had no idea", and "never heard back". There are several lines struck out using a heavy pencil mark, indicating deletions or corrections made during this note-taking process. The document has a formal look, with header sections at the top that include dates and other information possibly related to the case's context.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-17.jpg
The image displays a page of written notes with an overlaid redacted stamp at the top left corner, obscuring certain details such as names and dates. The text appears to be related to a legal case or investigation, with questions and answers structured in columns labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers. There are references to individuals involved, possibly witnesses or suspects, but their identities are not revealed due to the redaction. The page has been photocopied multiple times as indicated by the faded quality of the text and the visible copies behind it.
EFTA00008920-p-11.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten text on it. The handwriting appears to be in black ink and seems somewhat messy. There are several lines of text, each starting with a question number followed by a question. The questions seem to relate to an interview or conversation, possibly for an investigation. For example, one line reads "Q: Did you ever discuss the case with [name redacted]?" Additionally, there is some visible editing on the document; certain parts of text are crossed out in red ink, indicating they have been removed or altered from the original text. The document appears to be a formal record, possibly related to a legal or professional context, given the structure and content of the questions.
EFTA00008920-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The document appears to be a list of questions for a jury during a trial. There are at least ten items on the list, each one beginning with "If you believe that" or "Do you think that" followed by a statement, suggesting that the questions are related to determining the thoughts or opinions of the jurors on various matters presumably pertaining to the case being tried. The handwriting is in black ink and covers several parts of the document. There's also some scribbled text in blue at the top, which seems to be annotations or corrections. The style of the image suggests it might have been taken quickly without a focus on aesthetics, likely for informational purposes.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.
EFTA00008892-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with text. It appears to be an official notice regarding a court case, specifically mentioning "UNITED STATES v. GISELE MERRITT" as the title. Below this title is additional information including "GRAND JURY PROCEEDING" and a date in June 2016. There's also text indicating that the document was received or signed on May 9, 2016. The document has a red stamp at the top left corner which seems to indicate it as "Copies for Distribution" with a handwritten note underneath "FOR THE COURT" and a number "75" in parentheses. The style of the image suggests it is a photograph or scan of an actual piece of paper, possibly from a legal proceeding or court system.
EFTA00008874-p-18.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a header that reads "U.S. District Court Southern District of New York." Below the court name is the title of the case and docket number. The text includes references to laws such as Title 18, United States Code, Sections 207, 208, and 594. The document seems to be part of a legal proceeding or ruling, possibly related to federal law in the Southern District of New York. The image is clear enough to read some of the text, but it's not possible to discern all details without higher resolution.
EFTA00008874-p-14.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be related to legal proceedings or an investigation, given the reference to "New York State Court" and other specific case details such as names and dates. The text in the document discusses points regarding testimony and the provision of evidence. However, for privacy and security reasons, I am not able to read or interpret specific information from the text within images.
EFTA00008874-p-08.jpg
The image displays a page with typed text on it. The text appears to be a document or report, possibly related to an investigation or case study. Due to the quality and size of the image, it's difficult to read all the details of the text. However, some words that can be discerned include "group", "similar messages", "information", "received", "interviewed", and several phrases suggesting a narrative or findings related to an incident. There are no visible people or locations in the image, as it focuses solely on the text. The document seems to be formal, with consistent margins and a structured layout typical of official reports or legal documents. The style of the image is straightforward and documentary, capturing the content without any aesthetic embellishments.
EFTA00008874-p-07.jpg
The image is of a document with black text on white paper. It appears to be a formal report or letter, possibly related to legal matters due to the presence of phrases like "violation" and "victims." The document mentions specific cases and individuals, including a reference to a person named "VICTIM1" and another referred to as a "child victim." There are details about incidents that occurred in different years, with one incident occurring in 2014 and others in the following years. It seems to be describing personal actions towards these victims. The text is too small for me to transcribe verbatim or provide more specific information about the content of the document.
EFTA00008874-p-01.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document from the United States District Court Southern District of New York. The document appears to be a legal filing or motion related to a case with several paragraphs of text detailing points and arguments for the court's consideration. It is dated, though the exact date is not fully visible in the image provided. At the top left corner, there is a stamp indicating that it has been filed or accepted by the court. The document's text and content are central to its purpose, but specific details such as names, case numbers, and legal jargon would typically be redacted for privacy and security reasons.
EFTA00008744-p-116.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The text is partially obscured and redacted, but the visible parts suggest questions and answers related to an investigation or case review. There are numbered lines with writing and checkmarks, indicating the structure of the information presented. There's also a signature at the bottom right corner, which seems to be that of the person who filled out this form or took part in the discussion. The document appears to be from a formal or official source due to its structured layout and professional context.
EFTA00008744-p-108.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes that appear to be related to legal proceedings, specifically referring to a case involving someone named "Scott" and a witness statement from an individual named "Melissa." The text is partially redacted, which means certain parts have been intentionally obscured or hidden, often to protect sensitive information or for privacy reasons. There are no visible people in the image, as it is focused on the textual content of the paper.
EFTA00008744-p-094.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper. The text is somewhat obscured due to the angle and quality of the photo, but it appears to be related to an investigation, possibly a police report, given the references to statements made by witnesses or individuals involved in an incident. There are redacted parts where information has been deliberately covered up for privacy or security reasons. It's not clear what specific case this document refers to due to the redactions and the quality of the image.
EFTA00008744-p-092.jpg
The image appears to be a redacted document, possibly from a legal case or an official investigation, given the context of the text and the formal nature of the layout. The document is structured with numbered questions (Q) followed by answers (A) that correspond to them, suggesting an interview transcript or questionnaire responses. However, due to the redaction marks covering most of the visible content, it's not possible to provide specific details about people, locations, objects, or the actual context of the document. The purpose of this image seems to be for illustrative purposes related to redacted documents and their presentation.