Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Handwritten"

Found 743 documents with this tag

EFTA00008716-p-28.jpg

The image appears to be a low-resolution photo of a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The paper has been rotated and is placed against a background that is out of focus. It's difficult to read the entire content, but there are visible words like "It's just" and "your testimony" which suggest the context might be related to legal or court matters where testimony would be given. There is also a word that looks like "is it correct?" indicating a conversation or question regarding accuracy. The text is fragmented, and some parts of words are cut off by the edges of the image, making it challenging to accurately transcribe the entire content.

EFTA00008716-p-12.jpg

The image shows a letter with a handwritten signature at the bottom right corner. The top left corner features a date "December 21, 1996" and a name that appears to be inscribed by the sender of the letter. Below this date is an address label for the recipient, which reads "Gillian," along with the address "547 West 58th Street #3M New York, NY 10019 USA." The body of the text on the letter discusses a situation related to a room at the Kensington Lodge and mentions something about it being "swept" or moved from a location behind the wall for cleaning purposes. The sender expresses concern and seeks clarification.

EFTA00008716-p-11.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten annotations on it. The top of the page has "August 20th, 1994" written in blue ink. Below that, there is a table with rows and columns, but most of the text within the table is crossed out or obscured by a red marker's strokes. The visible text includes numbers such as "38" and what appears to be "250," along with words like "Fuel" which suggests that this document may be related to flight operations or logistics from the mentioned date in 1994. There are no people or locations identifiable within the image itself.

EFTA00008716-p-09.jpg

The image shows a printed document, which appears to be an official letter from "InterOcean Company" dated February 9, 1976. The letter is addressed to Jeffrey J. Epstein and mentions his recent sessions with the company's personnel development program at their facility in Oceanside, California. It expresses gratitude for his participation and offers a brochure for him to review. A handwritten note on the document suggests it has been reviewed by someone named "Ted." The overall tone of the letter seems professional and courteous, indicating an exchange within a corporate or educational context.

EFTA00008708-p-8.jpg

The image is a black and white copy of a document titled "CERTIFICATE". It appears to be a form that has been partially filled out with handwritten information. The top section includes lines for the name, address, and signature of an individual, although the details have not been completed. There are some numbers written in the blank spaces, but their significance is unclear without additional context. The document mentions that it pertains to "state reporting", which could indicate a legal or regulatory requirement. The bottom part includes a line for the name and title of an employee from State Reporting Inc., but this section is also left blank. The text in the image appears to be slightly blurred or smeared, making some words difficult to read with certainty.

EFTA00008708-p-7.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten annotations and notes. The writing is small and somewhat difficult to read due to the quality of the image. There are lines drawn through some words, indicating corrections or deletions. At the bottom right corner, there's a signature which appears to be that of "Linda Barker." It seems like a personal or official letter that has been reviewed and annotated by someone named Linda.

EFTA00008708-p-4.jpg

The image displays a handwritten page with notes that appear to be related to a legal case or court proceedings. The writing is somewhat messy and includes references to "Case No.", "Defendant", and "Plaintiff", which suggests the context of a lawsuit. There are also sections labeled 1 through 5, possibly indicating points or topics being addressed in the notes. Additionally, there's mention of a phone call schedule and some redacted text, likely to protect sensitive information. The page is numbered at the bottom right corner, indicating that it is part of a larger document or series of pages.

EFTA00008708-p-3.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The text is too small and blurry to read clearly, but it seems to contain questions or prompts related to a legal case. It mentions something about the "defendant" and asks for information about their activities during a certain time period. There are references to specific dates and times, as well as requests for explanations of certain events or actions. The writing style is informal, suggesting that this could be notes from an interview or brainstorming session rather than a formal legal document.

EFTA00008631-p-74.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes. The text on the paper is not fully visible due to a watermark that obscures certain parts of it. However, some visible phrases suggest that the text might be related to answering questions or responses to statements such as "I am sorry" and references to taking responsibility. There are also numerical values and percentages noted, but their context is unclear because they are partially hidden by the watermark. The paper appears to be a transcript or notes from an interview or meeting session.

EFTA00008631-p-72.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The paper seems to be slightly crumpled, suggesting it's been handled or folded. The text is written in black ink and includes responses to questions, which are partially obscured by the angle and resolution of the image. At the bottom of the page, there is a signature in blue ink, indicating an author or respondent. The content of the handwriting suggests a personal or professional correspondence, but specific details such as names, dates, and complete sentences are not fully legible.

EFTA00008631-p-71.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document or transcript with handwritten annotations on it. The majority of the content is obscured by black marks that prevent legibility. However, there are sections where the text is visible, including phrases such as "Q. Do you remember if he talked about the next date of his cover page?" and "A. No." This suggests that the document may be a record of an interview or legal proceeding with questions (Q) and answers (A) being recorded. The overall appearance is that of a piece of evidence related to an investigation, possibly due to its context and markings.

EFTA00008631-p-69.jpg

The image shows a page with handwritten notes, possibly from an interview or meeting. The writing is in black ink and appears to be structured into numbered sections with questions on the left side, labeled Q1 through Q6, followed by answers on the right side, labeled A1 through A6. There are also some additional comments interspersed within the answer section. The handwriting style varies slightly between questions and answers, suggesting different levels of formality or personalization.

EFTA00008631-p-64.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten text on lined paper. There is no visible person or location within the frame of the document. The text appears to be answers to questions related to an investigation or case, as suggested by phrases like "What did she say when you asked her" and "Did the suspect show any signs of distress?" The document seems to be a transcript or report from an interview or questioning session. There are checkmarks next to certain questions, possibly indicating important points or responses that were made during the conversation.

EFTA00008631-p-60.jpg

The image shows a handwritten document with multiple questions and answers related to travel experiences. The first question asks about the speaker's most recent trip, followed by other inquiries such as how long ago that trip was, whether they remember who their traveling companion was, and if there were any funny moments during that trip. Additionally, there is a line of text at the bottom that seems to be blacked out or obscured, possibly indicating sensitive information being redacted. The document appears to be an interview transcript or notes from an oral history project.

EFTA00008631-p-59.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The content appears to be a list or notes with numbers next to each line, suggesting questions or topics. There are red lines drawn through parts of the writing, possibly indicating that those sections have been marked for deletion or correction. Due to the resolution and angle of the photo, some details might not be entirely clear, but it seems like a standard piece of lined paper with ink handwriting on it. The background is nondescript and does not provide any additional context about the location or event related to this document.

EFTA00008631-p-56.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with handwritten notes and corrections made on it. The document contains written questions and answers that seem to pertain to an investigation or legal case. The page is numbered "20" at the top, indicating it's part of a larger set of documents. The text includes phrases such as "What did you tell them then?", "And what happened after?", and "Did she say anything else?", which suggest an interview or interrogation scenario. There are several corrections made with a black pen, highlighting changes to the original text. The handwriting of the corrections is in bold, making it stand out against the printed content.

EFTA00008631-p-51.jpg

The image appears to be a piece of paper with a handwritten list that includes numbers and answers to questions. The content seems to be related to an investigation or a set of inquiries, possibly from a witness statement or interview notes. There is a mention of a name "Sarah Wilson" which suggests the information may pertain to her. However, due to the resolution and the style of the handwriting, it's challenging to read all the details with certainty. The paper also contains some blacked-out areas, indicating that certain parts have been redacted or are not intended for public view.

EFTA00008631-p-50.jpg

The image appears to be a black and white photograph of a printed document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the format of questions with numbers, like Q1 and Q2. The visible text includes phrases such as "I don't know" and mentions of a specific person who seems to be the focus of the questioning. There are also words that suggest an inquiry into this individual's knowledge or interactions related to a certain situation. The document shows signs of use, with handwritten markings like underlining and annotations in red.

EFTA00008631-p-47.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten text on it, which appears to be a record of an interview or a series of questions and answers related to some sort of investigation or case review. There are multiple lines with numbers indicating the order of the entries (e.g., "12"), followed by question numbers (e.g., "Q: 50") and handwritten responses that have been redacted with black lines, obscuring the content for privacy or legal reasons. The text is somewhat smudged in places, making some words difficult to read, but overall it's clear that the document contains sensitive information intended for official use.

EFTA00008631-p-46.jpg

The image is a blurred photograph of a document with typed text and handwritten notes. The content appears to be related to an investigation or interview questions, but the specific topics are indistinct due to the low resolution. There are lines drawn through certain parts of the text, possibly indicating areas that have been reviewed or redacted. The background is not clear enough to discern any additional context or environment.

PreviousPage 16 of 38Next