Documents tagged "Id"
Found 2421 documents with this tag
EFTA00008744-p-039.jpg
The image you've provided appears to be a screenshot of a document with redacted content. The layout is typical for an official paper form or report, with fields labeled "Q" and "A" suggesting questions and answers. There are visible lines where text has been obscured by black marks, indicating sensitive information that has been intentionally hidden from view. The document's exact contents and purpose are not clear due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-035.jpg
The image displays a document with text that appears to be handwritten on lined paper. The writing is somewhat small and may include questions and responses, as suggested by the presence of numbered items followed by answers or comments. Some words are obscured by black marks, possibly for privacy or clarity reasons. The style of the text resembles that of a court transcript or interview notes. There's no identifiable information about people, locations, or significant objects apart from the text itself.
EFTA00008744-p-034.jpg
The image is a photograph of what appears to be a piece of paper with handwritten text on it. The text seems to contain some form of notes or questions, but the words are not entirely clear due to the angle and quality of the image. There's no visible person in the image; however, there might be someone holding the paper out of frame. The location is not discernible from this photograph alone. If you need further description or context about the content, please provide more information or clarify the question.
EFTA00008744-p-030.jpg
The image displays a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The document appears to be an official report or a legal transcript, possibly from a court proceeding or investigative interview. It contains sections labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers, suggesting a structured questioning format. In the visible portions of the text, there are references to New York City locations such as Times Square and Central Park, indicating that the subject matter pertains to events or individuals associated with these places. The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain parts of the document, likely to indicate redactions or areas of emphasis. There is also a highlighted section with an arrow pointing at it, which might be drawing attention to a specific part of the text for further discussion or reference. The image quality is not high enough to read all the details of the text, but the overall layout and annotations suggest a formal and serious nature for the content of the document. The style of the image is realistic with no artistic modifications, focusing solely on the reproduction of the physical documents.
EFTA00008744-p-028.jpg
The image shows a handwritten document with a series of numbered questions and answers, which appear to be related to an interview or survey of some sort. The text is written in black ink on lined paper, with the questions listed vertically on the left side and corresponding answers written next to each question. There are also sections with redacted information, where words have been obscured with black lines, indicating confidentiality or privacy concerns. At the bottom of the page, there's a redacted line that seems to contain contact information or credentials related to the document's author or distributor. The style of the image is candid and utilitarian, typical of an official record or transcription from a conversation or interview.
EFTA00008744-p-027.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten text and numbers on it. The document appears to be a form or transcript, possibly from an official proceeding like a court case given the layout and context. Sections of the text are redacted or obscured with black lines, indicating that sensitive information has been intentionally hidden. The visible parts suggest that there are questions or statements listed alongside corresponding answers or responses, but the specific details of what is being asked or answered are not fully disclosed due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-026.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes, possibly from an interview or meeting due to the presence of questions and answers. There's some redacted text in black squares indicating sensitive information has been obscured. The visible portions include phrases like "Yes" and "No" which suggest responding to yes/no questions. The rest is too small to read clearly, but it seems to be a structured conversation with follow-up questions and answers. There are no people or locations identified within the image.
EFTA00008744-p-023.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten notes, possibly taken from a meeting or interview. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its cursive nature and the quality of the photo. There are several lines of text that seem to contain questions and answers related to an interaction between individuals. Some sections of the text have been redacted with black marker, obscuring the content for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document itself has a formal appearance, suggesting it might be used in professional or legal contexts.
EFTA00008744-p-022.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten text and numbered lines. It appears to be a list with the title "Q & A" written at the top, indicating questions and answers are recorded here. The visible part of the first question reads, "What did you feel when you heard that she was pregnant?" The text is on lined paper, suggesting it might have been created by hand or typed onto a sheet meant for writing notes. The style of the document suggests an informal or personal context rather than a formal report or official document.
EFTA00008744-p-021.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a legal transcription of an interview transcript with the title "INTERVIEW TRANSCRIPT" crossed out at the top. The text within the document includes questions and answers related to events in New York City, the age of a person involved, and their experience during the summer of 2015. There are references to shopping, movies, and visiting people's houses. Names and other identifying information have been redacted for privacy. The document is dated "1/26/2017" and includes a handwritten note at the bottom that seems to be an observation or comment on the content of the interview.
EFTA00008744-p-020.jpg
The image displays a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers on it. The text is partially obscured by the redacted sections indicated by black rectangles, suggesting sensitive information has been hidden for privacy purposes. The visible text includes phrases like "Did you know", "What do you think", and "How many times", which appear to be prompts for responses related to personal or private matters. However, due to the redaction, it's difficult to discern the full context of the questions or the nature of the answers provided in this document.
EFTA00008744-p-018.jpg
The image shows a document with a list of questions and answers. The text is black on a white background and appears to be typed. Some of the questions are visible but certain parts have been redacted or obscured with black lines, presumably for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This suggests that the document might contain sensitive information or specific details about an investigation or inquest. At the top left corner, there's a date stamp indicating "08/24/1997" which is likely when the document was prepared or last updated. The style of the image is straightforward and informational, without any decorative elements.
EFTA00008744-p-017.jpg
The image shows a handwritten page that appears to be a transcript of an interview or dialogue with several questions and answers. The questions are labeled "Q1" through "Q8" and the corresponding answers are marked as "A". Each question is followed by one answer, indicating an individual response to each inquiry. There's text in black ink on what seems to be a white paper background.
EFTA00008744-p-015.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with various sections of text and handwritten notes, predominantly on yellowish paper. The text is mostly black, but some red markings are present, possibly indicating corrections or important points. There are also handwritten comments in blue ink scattered throughout the page. Some text has been blacked out with marker, obscuring its content. At the bottom right corner of the image, there's a date stamp and additional handwriting that might contain signatures or initials. The document seems to be related to an interview or investigation given the context provided by the visible text.
EFTA00008744-p-013.jpg
The image appears to be a photocopy of a document with handwritten notes and redacted information. The content seems to consist of paragraphs interspersed with questions followed by answers. There is visible text on the page that includes phrases such as "What I think," "someone has to come up," "investigation course of action," and various other statements which are not fully legible due to the redacted sections. The paper also contains personal information that has been deliberately obscured by lines through it, indicating sensitivity or confidentiality.
EFTA00008744-p-012.jpg
The image displays a page with handwritten notes that appear to be taken during an interview or conversation. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its sloppiness and the low resolution of the image. There are lines crossed out, which could indicate corrections or redactions in the text. The page includes numbered sections, suggesting it's part of a structured record-taking process. It seems to be a personal note rather than an official document, as there are no visible logos or stamps that would identify a specific institution or organization.
EFTA00008744-p-010.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The paper has lines of text that seem to relate to some sort of investigation or testimony, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: Did you turn the red lamp off?" and "A: Yes I did." There are several lines with questions followed by answers written in different handwriting styles, suggesting multiple contributors or interviewers. The document includes a date at the top right corner, which is obscured but seems to be from early 2001. There's also a name and phone number printed at the bottom left corner, which could possibly belong to an individual related to the document's content or context.
EFTA00008744-p-007.jpg
The image shows a document with typed questions and answers on it. The questions are numbered from 1 to 29. They appear to be inquiries about the subject's activities and location, specifically asking whether they participated in certain events and if they have connections to specific places or individuals. One notable question mentions "Anthony Bourdain" as a point of reference. The answers provided seem to confirm participation in various activities and indicate relationships with different locations and people named in the questions.
EFTA00008744-p-006.jpg
The image appears to be a page from an official document, possibly legal or investigative in nature, given the context and style of the text. The majority of the content is redacted with black lines covering words and phrases that were presumably written here before being obscured. The visible parts include some question numbers (such as "Q: 20") and statements like "Yes" and "No," suggesting that this could be a section where individuals are asked to confirm or deny certain statements or questions relevant to the investigation. The quality of the image is low, with a faded and slightly blurry appearance, making it challenging to discern the text clearly.
EFTA00008744-p-005.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with redacted text, which suggests it may contain sensitive information that has been intentionally obscured for privacy or security reasons. The text on the page is not fully legible due to the redaction marks, but there are some visible phrases and numbers such as "June 13," "Q4," and "A28," indicating a sectional numbering system. The style of the document suggests it could be related to a legal or official proceeding, possibly a court transcript given the context provided in your description.