Documents tagged "Kathy Ruemmler"
Found 114 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028875.txt
This email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discusses a news event involving Senator Reid's aide who was found guilty on seven counts of misconduct. The topic of the conversation is whether the aide could have been reinstated after being convicted once, and Jeffrey E. expresses disbelief that anyone would be so stupid to engage in such behavior again. The exchange also touches upon Kathy Ruemmler's travel plans and schedule for a conference.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028870.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discussing legal matters related to Reid and Governor's cases. They are debating the possibility of Reid's guy going down on all 7 counts, as well as whether or not Governor is Jewish. The conversation also touches upon scheduling and prioritization issues.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028866.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discussing various topics including politics, public figures, and travel plans. The emails mention people such as Reid and Governor, places like New York and D.C., and events or situations involving trains and hospitals. Some emails have been truncated, making it difficult to summarize the content accurately. It seems that Kathy is providing information or updates to Jeffrey in a casual, conversational tone.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028862.txt
The document is a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. The main topic discussed is the sentencing of Harry Reid's aide on seven counts. In addition to this topic, there are also discussions about managing schedules and prioritizing tasks effectively during an eventful week in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028859.txt
The document discusses a person named Reid who has been found guilty of seven counts in court, which is referred to as "Reid's guy going down on all 7 counts." The context suggests that the conversation is taking place in a professional setting, and one participant expresses concerns about not effectively prioritizing their schedule. Another person mentions meeting various high-profile individuals such as Thiel, Summers, Bill Burns, Gordon Brown, the President of Mongolia, Hardeep Puri (India), Boris (Gates), Jabor (Qatar), Sultan (Dubai), Kosslyn (Harvard), Leon Black, Woody, and other prominent figures. The document also includes references to girls and high-risk/reward situations in a professional context.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt
The document is an email conversation between two individuals. The main topics of discussion include travel plans and the handling of a work-related situation involving high risk/reward versus low risk/reward factors. Key people mentioned in the conversation are Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., with reference to Reid's guy who went down on all 7 counts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between two individuals discussing scheduling conflicts and managing priorities in a professional context. The sender mentions that they will have limited availability due to the Unga week, during which their boss is expected to be in town. They express concern about being able to manage all of their commitments effectively. The recipient responds by listing several people who are scheduled to be in town for various events such as a climate summit and a security council meeting. They also mention that they will need to prioritize high-risk, high-reward tasks over low-risk, low-reward tasks. Both individuals express frustration with the challenges of balancing professional responsibilities and personal needs.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026652.txt
The document discusses a situation where an Israeli mogul hired a former White House counsel to represent one of his employees who was arrested during the inauguration day riot. The choice of attorney raised questions and the incident was covered by Heatstreak, which is referred to as "craziness" in the document. Key people mentioned include Kathy Ruemmler, Jamie Glick, Stuart Kurlander, Kimberly Alexander, and a former White House counsel who represented the employee. The focus of the document is on the hiring of the former White House counsel and the questions it raises.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026605.txt
The document discusses a story about Kathryn Ruemmler, former White House counsel, who has turned down an offer to succeed Eric Holder as U.S. Attorney General. She was concerned that her experience as a close adviser to President Obama would lead to a difficult confirmation process in the current highly charged partisan environment and that it could ignite political attacks against the president. Her withdrawal leaves no obvious front-runner to replace Holder, who announced his intention to step down once a replacement is confirmed. Other candidates being considered for the position include Solicitor General Don Verrilli; Labor Secretary Tom Perez; Loretta Lynch, U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York; and Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026437.txt
The email discusses a Trump book being written by Michael Wolff for which he is seeking introductions to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler. Jeffrey E. responds that it is fine with him, but also mentions the confidentiality of the information contained in the communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026378.txt
In the document, there are several key people involved in a conversation regarding financial proposals and compensation. Stephen J. Immelt, who is a partner and CEO of Hogan Lovells US LLP in Washington, DC, wrote to Kathy Ruemmler about her potential role in his company. He mentioned that he would like to discuss compensation before any further meetings take place. Kathy Ruemmler responded by stating that she is intrigued by the opportunity and wants to meet with Michael, who can provide a global perspective on the case. It seems that there are conditions for mutually acceptable terms, but it's not clear what those conditions are.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026372.txt
In the conversation between Jeffrey E. and Kathy Ruemmler, they discuss a person named MacGyver who is described as being able to justify two opposite statements with conviction. Jeffrey mentions that he stopped talking to Clinton because of similar behavior, and Kathy expresses concern about MacGyver's lack of conscience. They also talk about an apology and acknowledgment of responsibility that Jeffrey owes Kathy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026369.txt
In a series of emails between Jeffrey E. and Kathy Ruemmler, Jeffrey expresses concern about a man's lack of consistency and memory issues. He discusses the man's disturbing behavior and refers to him as potentially psychopathic due to his apparent lack of conscience. The emails suggest that there may have been a bet made regarding an apology and acceptance of responsibility from the man in question, but Kathy is skeptical that such an outcome will occur.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026356.txt
The document is a series of emails between Martin Weinberg and Jeffrey Epstein, with other recipients including Kathy Ruemmler and Miles Alexander. The main topic discussed in the emails involves attorney-client privilege and the need to protect sensitive information. There are also references to Little St. James Island, which seems to be relevant to the discussion. The emails are marked as privileged communication, suggesting they contain confidential or legal information that is not intended for public disclosure.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026345.txt
The document discusses a potential appointment of Kathryn Ruemmler as the next Attorney General by President Obama. The conversation is between Jeffrey and Kathy, with Jeffrey suggesting that Kathy call him in ten minutes. This email contains confidential information related to attorney-client privilege and inside information, intended only for the recipient's use.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026344.txt
The email discusses a floor statement of Senator Barack Obama regarding the nomination of Alberto Gonzales for Attorney General from a Wikisource link. The sender expresses their amazement and mentions that the information is confidential and intended only for the addressee. They also caution against unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of the communication.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026280.txt
The document discusses the potential legal issues surrounding the Mueller investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election. It mentions a report from the Justice Department's inspector general that uncovered evidence of anti-Trump bias by high-ranking FBI officials. The authors suggest that this bias could have affected the legality of the Trump-Russia collusion inquiry, and they argue that Mueller's investigation is tainted as a result. They conclude that there is a "zero chance" that a court would find a due process violation based on these facts, and they dismiss the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine as inapplicable to this case. The document includes emails from Kathy Ruemmler, Steve Bannon, and David Rivkin, among others.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026270.txt
This email thread discusses the idea of having former U.S. President Bill Clinton join Kathy Ruemmler, Jeffrey E., Steve Bannon, and Susan Rice for a private meeting. The group's lawyer advises against this due to potential legal implications, but one participant suggests that with enough shoes (possibly referencing bribery), the lawyer might change their mind. This email mentions that it is confidential and intended only for the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025908.txt
The document is an email chain between Kathy Ruemmler, Jeffrey, and Stephen Immelt. The topic of discussion revolves around a potential job offer to Kathy from Hogan Lovells US LLP. Key points include compensation outside the company's "bell curve", contribution to the culture of the firm, and Michael providing a global perspective. A meeting has been suggested to discuss further details.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025906.txt
The document is an email chain between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey regarding meeting with Michael Davison, who is the global head of litigation at Hogan LoveIls. The discussion involves compensation before meeting with Michael, as it would be a big move for her. In addition to this, the email also mentions that Christie endorsed Trump in the election.