Documents tagged "Kathy Ruemmler"
Found 114 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025882.txt
This document appears to be an email exchange between individuals discussing attorney-client privilege. The key people mentioned are Jeffrey E. Peevy and Martin Weinberg, who may be attorneys at law firm. The messages contain references to privileged information and state that any disclosure or use of the contents is prohibited. There are also mentions of house oversight and Boston locations in the emails.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025879.txt
The document is an email exchange between Martin Weinberg and Jeffrey Epstein with the subject of ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE. In one of the emails, Cathy Alexander responds to the previous message by stating that she was Little St. James island's manager from 1999 through 2007 and that she can confirm if former President Clinton or former Vice President Gore ever visited the island. The email is marked as privileged and intended for the addressee only.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025841.txt
In this email conversation between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., they discuss the difficulty of making a decision about an apartment in New York that costs significantly more than their monthly salary. Kathy suggests waiting to make a decision until Sunday when she will have more information. The conversation also includes discussion about another person named Eric, who may be able to provide additional context for the decision.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025834.txt
In a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. on September 19, 2014, they discuss the complexity of making decisions and the financial burden of renting an apartment in New York City. They also touch upon the topic of Jewish identity in politics. The emails reveal a back-and-forth conversation with both individuals sharing their thoughts and opinions on these matters.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025827.txt
The document is a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. with various topics and key people such as the governor, Reid, and Eric. The conversation includes discussions about a rental apartment, data points, giving up an apartment in NY, feeling stupid, and multiple mentions of going through periods of self-reflection and despair.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025820.txt
The document is an email conversation between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. regarding the topic of giving up an apartment in New York due to high rent costs. The key people involved are Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., who provide advice and discuss their feelings on the matter. They mention that they will consider calling Eric for a data point before making a decision.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025814.txt
In this exchange of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., Kathy expresses her hesitation about giving up her apartment in New York. Jeffrey suggests that she wait until Sunday to make a decision. The conversation also touches on topics such as the Jewish faith, politics, and public transportation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025660.txt
The document discusses a conversation between Jeffrey E. and Kathy Ruemmler about Benjamin's reaction to Ariane not knowing about her tattoo. It is unclear what Ariane meant by "wife like things" in the context of their relationship. The communication also mentions Steve Bannon, Bill Clinton, Michael Flynn, and Susan Rice in relation to a Politico article, but it is not clear how these individuals are connected to the conversation or if they are relevant to the topic at hand.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025649.txt
The email exchange discusses a woman wanting to do wife-like things and whether Benjamin is upset about it. The sender also mentions Steve Bannon's reaction to classified information involving Susan Rice and Michael Flynn during the Obama administration. There are also references to Bill Clinton, Ehud Barak, and a House Oversight document number 025649.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025647.txt
The document is an email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. The topics discussed include Benjamin's upsetness, Steve Bannon, Susan Rice, Michael Flynn, Bill Clinton, and tattoos. The importance of the communication is marked as high. The email contains confidentiality disclaimers, including information about attorney-client privilege and restricted use.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023440.txt
The document contains a series of emails between Jeffrey E and Kathy Ruemmler discussing friendship as a biological process with complex interactions of altruism and cooperation, and how it does not lead to genetic fitness. Nick Christophalos is mentioned as someone who has done significant work in this area. The conversation also touches on topics such as decision making, the difficulty of saying no, the importance of sleep, and Kathy's reluctance to give up her apartment in New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023418.txt
The document appears to be a series of email exchanges between two people discussing various topics such as decision making, apartment rental costs, and reading habits. The names Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E are mentioned several times in the conversation. There is also reference to a person named David Brooks, which might suggest that they are talking about something he wrote or said.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019300.txt
The document discusses WE Talks, an organization focused on women's empowerment through professional and personal growth seminars. The first seminar is scheduled to take place in NYC on April 5th with Kathy Ruemmler as the speaker. Ruemmler is a former White House Counsel under President Obama and has been praised for her ability to anticipate potential legal issues. The discussions will cover topics such as pursuing one's dream career, building a unique brand, and achieving balance in personal and professional life.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012037.txt
The message is from Jeffrey E. to Kathy Ruemmler regarding a press article in AmLaw Litigation Daily about Emirates Bank's win. The forwarded messages show that Latham & Watkins lawyers, including Daniel Schecter and Kathryn Ruemmler, successfully defended the bank against trade secret theft accusations in Orange County, California. The case involved high stakes of over half a billion dollars in damages, with challenging facts and an unsympathetic narrative for the defense. The article suggests that Latham & Watkins' closing arguments turned the tide in favor of the Middle Eastern bank.