Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Official"

Found 398 documents with this tag

EFTA00008631-p-32.jpg

The image you've shared is quite blurry and contains a large amount of text that's difficult to read due to the low resolution. It appears to be a document with many lines of text, possibly a legal report, a case study, or some kind of official paper. The quality of the image makes it challenging to discern specific details about the content of the document.

EFTA00008631-p-29.jpg

The image is a blurred photograph of a document, possibly an official form or report. The text is not entirely clear due to the blurriness and shadowing on the paper. It appears to have printed questions or prompts with handwritten responses beneath them. There are several lines that seem to be filled out with black ink writing, but it's difficult to discern the specific content of these answers without a clearer view. The document is structured in columns, suggesting an organized format for collecting information or conducting inquiries.

EFTA00008631-p-28.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with black and white text. The text is partially redacted, meaning certain parts of the words are obscured by being marked out, typically done to maintain privacy in sensitive documents. It seems like a formal or official document, possibly related to court proceedings given the structure of questions and answers typical of an interview or deposition. The redaction marks suggest that this is not a publicly accessible document but rather one intended for specific individuals involved in the case.

EFTA00008631-p-23.jpg

The image is of a piece of paper with several lines of handwritten text that appear to be notes or questions related to some kind of discussion or interview. The first line at the top reads "Q: Can you tell us how long this has been going on?" followed by "Answer:" and it's crossed out, possibly indicating that the answer was not given or is irrelevant. Other lines include similar questions and answers, such as "Did you know about the situation with John? Answer: No, I didn't know anything about that until yesterday." The text is somewhat messy, suggesting a hurried handwriting or perhaps emotional distress. There are also multiple words crossed out, further indicating a sense of urgency or the need to clarify certain points. The paper has been scanned and appears to be from a personal notepad rather than an official document due to its informal nature.

EFTA00008631-p-05.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes and marks made by a person. The document appears to be an official court record or transcript, indicated by the header that includes the word "COURT" in capital letters. There are lines through certain sections of text, suggesting it has been redacted or deemed confidential. Handwritten annotations include underlines, circled words, and margin notes, likely indicating areas of interest or concern for the person reviewing the document. The focus is on the content of the document rather than its aesthetic qualities.

EFTA00008631-p-02.jpg

The image is a blurry photograph of what appears to be an official document, possibly a court record or transcript due to the presence of a header with redacted information and questions listed under sections labeled "Q" for questioner and "A" for answerer. The text within these sections is too small and blurred to read clearly. The quality of the image does not allow for detailed descriptions of specific texts or objects, but it conveys the sense of an official legal document that has been partially obscured by redaction.

EFTA00008599-p-31.jpg

The image appears to be a screenshot of a digital document with an overlay of redacted information using black squares. The date "September 16, 2001" is prominently displayed at the top in bold text, suggesting that it's from after the tragic events of September 11th. There are several columns filled with what seems to be a list or chart, though much of the information is obscured by redaction. The specific content and purpose of the document are not clear due to the redactions. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, typical of official documents or spreadsheets used in professional settings.

EFTA00008599-p-10.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with personal information redacted using black marker. The top section includes what looks like an address with the words "APARTMENT #" and part of the number visible. Below this are two columns with headings, likely sections for personal data, one of which is labeled "NAME OF EMPLOYEE" with some text underneath it. There is a date in one corner that seems to be redacted as well. The document has a formal appearance consistent with employment-related paperwork or an official form.

EFTA00008585-p-13.jpg

The image is a low-resolution photograph of a printed page with handwritten notes and typed information. The top right corner of the document displays what appears to be a court case number and date: "Page 17" and "2/6/90," suggesting that this might be related to legal proceedings. There are several lines of text within the image, but due to the resolution, it's challenging to read the details accurately. However, one visible word is "Possibility," which could indicate a section heading or note. The overall style of the image is informal and seems like a personal photocopy or snapshot rather than an official court document.

EFTA00008585-p-12.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with text and numbers on it. The paper is slightly crumpled, indicating it has been handled or used. Some words in the text are redacted with black lines, obscuring their content, which suggests that this could be an official or sensitive document where some information needs to remain confidential. The document is numbered at the top right corner, and there is a watermark or stamp on it, but the details of these markings are not entirely clear due to the resolution and angle of the photograph.

EFTA00008585-p-04.jpg

The image you've provided appears to be a document with printed content, possibly from a legal proceeding or official record. However, due to the low resolution and angle of the photo, it is difficult to read the text clearly and provide an accurate description. If you need information on specific content within the document, please provide a clearer image or describe what you're looking for in more detail.

EFTA00008585-p-03.jpg

The image is a close-up of a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The background is not clearly visible due to the zoom level, but the focus is on the words and writing. The document appears to be related to a legal or investigative matter, as suggested by phrases like "UNITED STATES" and "CHILDREN'S PROTECTION ACT." The typeface of the printed text is formal, suggesting an official nature to the document. There are check marks next to certain lines in the handwritten part, indicating some form of review or approval process. The image does not show any people, locations, or significant objects other than the paper itself and its content.

EFTA00008529-p-56.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten text on it. The document appears to be an official paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or business matters, as suggested by the presence of signatures and stamps. There are several lines of text that seem to include dates, names, and other details relevant to the context of this document, but due to the resolution and angle of the photograph, it's not possible to read all the information clearly. The handwriting is black ink on a background that could be white paper.

EFTA00008529-p-54.jpg

The image shows a page of handwritten notes from what appears to be an interview or meeting. There are several lines written by the same person, likely questions or topics discussed during the conversation. The text is somewhat difficult to read due to the writing style and handwriting quality. The document includes dates, times, and redacted names, suggesting it may have legal implications or is of a confidential nature. The overall image has a slight blur and appears to be an official report or transcript from a formal event.

EFTA00008529-p-41.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly an official report or statement. There is text on the page, but it is slightly blurred and not entirely legible due to the scanning quality. The visible parts of the text include words such as "occurred", "questioned", "receive", and "satisfaction". Additionally, there are numbers such as "29" and "30" in the margins. There is also a section that seems to be titled "Q: What did she tell you about her purchase?" followed by an answer. The style of the image suggests it was taken with a digital camera or scanner aimed at a physical document, resulting in some loss of clarity.

EFTA00008529-p-38.jpg

The image is of a printed document with visible handwritten annotations on it. The text appears to be blacked out for privacy or security reasons. On the bottom left corner, there's a signature in blue ink, suggesting that the document has been reviewed and approved by someone named "Johnny" as indicated by the name below the signature. In the top right corner, there is an illegible word written with a red pen, which could indicate a correction or emphasis on the text. The overall style of the image suggests it might be related to legal proceedings or official investigations given the formality of the document and the markings made upon it.

EFTA00008529-p-33.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with text written in black ink on white paper. The document has been marked with various redactions; the original content beneath these redacted sections is not visible. However, some words are still legible and show that the document contains responses to questions or statements, indicated by numbers followed by answers or comments. The visible text includes phrases such as "My name is" which suggests a question about identity. There's also a date mentioned in one of the redactions: "June 13th, 2014." The document seems to be an official record of some sort, possibly related to an interview or testimony, given the structured format with numbered questions and responses. The quality of the image is somewhat blurred, making it difficult to read all the text clearly. Due to the redacted nature of the content, there are no specific details about people, locations, or significant objects that can be confidently reported from this image alone.

EFTA00008529-p-32.jpg

The image is of a piece of paper with several lines of text, which appears to be part of an official document, possibly related to legal proceedings. The document includes question numbers (1 through 6) and corresponding answers, though specific details are not fully visible due to the resolution of the image. There are also some words or phrases that seem to have been redacted with black lines to obscure their content. The text is handwritten, suggesting it could be a transcript from an interview or hearing. The paper has a watermark-like background with diagonal stripes and what looks like a signature or stamp at the bottom right corner, indicating the document's authenticity or ownership.

EFTA00008529-p-29.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed document with text on it. The style of the text suggests it's a transcript from an official proceeding, possibly a court case given the numbered questions and answers. However, the specific content and names are redacted, obscured by black lines to preserve privacy or confidentiality. The image itself has been taken at an angle, making some words difficult to read due to the diagonal orientation of the text on the page.

EFTA00008529-p-26.jpg

The image is a scanned document with text and line numbers on the left side. It appears to be a transcript from a court proceeding, as indicated by phrases like "THE COURT" and "THE WITNESS." The lines include exchanges between an individual and the witness, such as questions and answers related to observations of people or events. There's no visual of the actual courtroom or participants; it's purely textual information presented in a standard, structured format commonly used for official records.

PreviousPage 8 of 20Next