Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Stanford"

Found 7 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031165.txt

The document is an email titled "Eye on the Market" sent by us.gio@jpmorgan.com to undisclosed recipients, dated June 14, 2011. The sender discusses current market conditions and expectations for the rest of the year. They mention that despite some optimism in April, there are ongoing structural problems weighing on the private sector. The email also references a PDF attachment that is easier to read.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030630.txt

This email discusses a recent trip under Golden Gate Bridge with Stanford friends and shares plans for visiting someone in Tucson for an assistant position. It also mentions Zubair's project, which is related to the election campaigns of Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, and seeks opinions on its potential use.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030006.txt

This document is titled "Eye on the Market" dated June 14, 2011, and it provides an update on market conditions from a financial institution's perspective. The main topics discussed include market optimism in April and the tug-of-war between private sector profits and public sector problems. The author also notes that while equity markets are priced inexpensively, they are likely to stay that way due to stimulus in the East and ineffective stimulus in the West. Additionally, the document discusses the Osama Bin Laden episode's impact on the equity market peak and how it lasted for only around 2.5 hours. The author also references Christina Romer and John Taylor from Stanford University and highlights the disproportionately large pain that small, non-sovereign entities can inflict in the modern era.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029092.txt

In this email exchange, Jeremy Rubin is in Japan teaching a class on Bitcoin to Japanese engineers while Jeffrey E. is in New York. They discuss the latest political appointments and trends related to cryptocurrency, with references to Balaji Srinivasan, Allison, Peter Thiel, and Stanford's BPASE. Jeremy also mentions his recent research involving an inverse-input contract for matching donations and the challenges of teaching about Bitcoin in a debt-based society like Japan.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029090.txt

The document is an email conversation between Jeremy Rubin and Jeffrey E. with the subject "Re: Greetings from Japan". Jeremy Rubin shares his experience of teaching a class to Japanese engineers about Bitcoin in Japan and mentions how they are initially hesitant towards the technology despite being well-suited for it. He also discusses the political appointments by President Trump, including Balaji as FDA head and Allison's stance on Bitcoin, along with the comparison made by Thiel between Paypal and Bitcoin. Rubin has presented his research at Stanford's BPASE, where he introduced an inverse-input contract concept. Additionally, Jeremy mentions that a hedge fund manager friend of his believes female Japanese engineers are under-appreciated and values them highly.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029087.txt

The email discusses current events related to Bitcoin and Trump's appointments, as well as the author's research on inverse-input contracts. It mentions a trip to Japan to teach Japanese engineers about Bitcoin, noting that they are hesitant despite being well-suited for the technology due to their debit-based society. The author also references positive feedback from a presentation at Stanford and discusses women in STEM fields.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020447.txt

The document is a report from the Working Group on Chinese Influence Activities in the United States. It discusses China's efforts to influence American interests and public opinion, including through government policies, investments, propaganda, and cyber attacks. The report identifies several key people and places associated with these activities, such as senior officials at the Chinese Communist Party and state-owned enterprises, academic institutions, and think tanks that have received funding from China. It also highlights concerns about the potential for undue influence on American policymaking and public opinion, and recommends strategies for promoting constructive vigilance to address these risks.