Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "handwritten"

Found 743 documents with this tag

EFTA00008920-p-54.jpg

The image shows a document with a handwritten list of questions or prompts. The writing is somewhat smudged and difficult to read in some areas. There are numbered lines that suggest the presence of multiple points or topics. In the bottom right corner, there appears to be a signature, but it's not clear who signed it. The date "21/9/94" can be seen at the top left corner, indicating when the document was likely created or last revised. The overall condition of the paper suggests it has been handled and used extensively.

EFTA00008920-p-52.jpg

The image displays a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The content of the document is redacted with black marker, obscuring most of the text and making it difficult to read. There are some words that can still be seen, but they do not provide context or significance. The quality of the scan is low, with visible pixelation and a faded appearance, especially in certain areas where ink has bled through from the backside of the paper. The style of the document suggests it could be an interview summary or a list of questions due to the numbered sections and question marks interspersed throughout.

EFTA00008920-p-51.jpg

The image displays a page with handwritten notes on lined paper. The title at the top of the page reads "Questionnaire for Witnesses". The text is organized into numbered questions and bullet-pointed answers. The content refers to specific individuals, places, and events, though some words are crossed out or redacted, making parts of the information obscured. There is a date at the bottom of the page, indicating when it was written. The writing suggests that this document is part of an official investigation or inquiry process.

EFTA00008920-p-50.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and printed text. The handwriting is on the left side of the page and appears to be in blue ink, providing answers to numbered questions or points raised in what seems to be a deposition or an interview setting. On the right side, there's printed text that includes a date "5/12/04" at the top right corner and is followed by additional information such as names and possibly roles or affiliations of individuals. The document has a formal appearance, suggesting it could be related to legal proceedings or an official investigation.

EFTA00008920-p-49.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The document is titled "Notes for Interview with Ms. K." and contains a list of questions or topics that are relevant to the interview. Some parts of the text have been redacted, meaning they've been intentionally obscured to hide sensitive information. It seems like this document was prepared in advance for an important discussion, possibly related to legal matters given the context suggested by the redactions and the formal structure of the notes.

EFTA00008920-p-43.jpg

The image you've shared appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it. The background of the document is white, and there are black texts and markings throughout, indicating that someone has reviewed this material and made annotations. Some of the writing includes phrases like "flight records" and what seems to be questions or points of discussion related to travel logistics. There's also a phone number written at the top right corner of the document. The overall style of the image is typical for a formal record that has been through an inspection or review process, as evidenced by the visible annotations.

EFTA00008920-p-42.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with a list printed on it. The list appears to be an interview guide or a series of questions for someone named "Harry" related to an incident that occurred. Some of the items listed include: 1) When was this? 2) What did you do? 3) Where were you when you found out about [something]? 4) How long have you been aware of your situation? 5) Did anyone else know what happened before? 6) Don't you think it would be better to just... 7) What did you tell people about the change in plans? 8) I was surprised by something you said about... 9) Have you talked to someone from our group since [an event]? 10) Did anyone ever show any interest in your work? 11) Do you think it's better if he doesn't know anything? 12) Has Harry spoken with someone from our group since the meeting? The text is typed, and there are two handwritten annotations on the paper: a check mark next to question number 10, and a line through question number 9. The background is plain, and no people or other significant objects can be seen in this description.

EFTA00008920-p-41.jpg

The image is of a document with a header that reads "COURT REPORTER" followed by the date "6/27/01" and a page number "113" in the top right corner. It appears to be a transcript from a court proceeding, as indicated by the numbered questions (Q) and answers (A). The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to contain statements made by individuals during the course of legal proceedings. There's also a mention of a person named "MARTIN" in one of the responses. The overall style of the image suggests an official court document with typed content and handwritten notes or corrections on some lines.

EFTA00008920-p-40.jpg

The image shows a printed document with text that appears to be a transcript of an interview or conversation. The document is numbered from one to sixteen, suggesting a structured set of questions or topics discussed. However, the majority of the text within these numbers has been redacted or obscured by black marks, making it impossible to read the contents of the conversation. The style of the image is that of a physical copy with handwritten redaction marks.

EFTA00008920-p-39.jpg

The image is a photograph of what appears to be a piece of paper with printed text and handwritten annotations. The paper has several lines of text, which are mostly obscured by black ink markings, indicating parts that have been redacted or censored. At the top, there's visible text "DOCUMENT 6" followed by a date "10/25/94." Below that, there's an arrow pointing to the left side of the image, where you can see part of a handwritten note. The background is not distinct due to the focus on the paper. There are no people or specific locations discernible from this image.

EFTA00008920-p-36.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with a list of questions and answers handwritten on it. The writing appears to be related to an interview or discussion about someone's experiences or opinions, given the context provided by the visible text. Specific details about the questions and answers are not clear due to the angle and focus of the photograph. There is a mention of a specific date in March, but the full year is not visible. The paper has some lines crossed out with a pen, which could indicate corrections or edits made during the process of transcribing the information.

EFTA00008920-p-35.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text, which appears to be a form or checklist. The writing is in black ink on a light background. There are lines through some sections and words, indicating they have been crossed out, possibly as part of the process being documented. The visible text includes phrases like "interview summary" and what seems to be questions or prompts related to an interview or assessment session. There are also numbers next to each line, likely for checking off completed items. The image has a personal or confidential feel due to the nature of its content.

EFTA00008920-p-34.jpg

The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes across it. The document appears to be a form or survey of some sort with sections numbered and questions listed below each number. There are lines for answers, but they have been redacted or obscured with black marks. At the top right corner of the page, there's a watermark that says "Confidential" in an italicized font. The text is too small to read, and any discernible information has been intentionally concealed.

EFTA00008920-p-33.jpg

The image shows a printed document with handwritten notes and annotations throughout. The text is small and difficult to read due to the quality of the photograph; however, it appears to be a form with multiple sections and questions that have been answered by someone. There are signatures at the bottom of the page, indicating where individuals have signed their names. A significant object in this image is the paper itself, which serves as the medium for both written information and handwritten responses.

EFTA00008920-p-31.jpg

The image shows a page of handwritten notes that appear to be from a telephone interview or conversation with an airline. The text includes questions and answers related to passenger names, flight details, and other specifics about the travel experience. Names like "Tammy" and "Tom" are mentioned as passengers in the context of booking flights or changes to their travel plans. There's also mention of a flight on October 19th, with a change made at JFK (John F. Kennedy International Airport). The person taking the notes has written "Q & A" at the top left corner, indicating that these are questions and answers from the conversation. The handwriting is in black ink on lined paper, suggesting a casual or informal setting for the interview or discussion.

EFTA00008920-p-30.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed text. The page is titled "Q&A" followed by "Re: Private Matter" indicating the content might be related to a private discussion or question. Some sections of the text have been redacted, obscuring part of the message. It mentions an address in New York and a location called "Mahasena." There are several questions marked with Q1, Q2, etc., suggesting that this document is structured as a series of inquiries, presumably with corresponding answers. The handwriting varies, indicating multiple people might be involved or it was written at different times.

EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.

EFTA00008920-p-27.jpg

The image displays a typed document with handwritten annotations and corrections on the right side. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the heading "INTERVIEW OF WITNESS" followed by a date and the name of an individual, which is redacted. Below this title, there are sections labeled A through D, each containing numbered questions with corresponding answers. Section A starts with question 16 asking about the witness's knowledge of someone named "Peterson" who reportedly has access to a building on East 3rd Street. The handwritten annotations next to this question and others in section A highlight specific points or clarify certain responses. The document seems to be a record of an interview conducted as part of legal investigation, possibly related to a real estate case given the references to properties and individuals associated with them.

EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.

EFTA00008920-p-24.jpg

The image is a scanned document with handwritten content. It appears to be a page from a legal case summary or notes taken during an interview or court proceeding. The page contains multiple numbered points with handwritten text that seems to be related to witness statements or questions asked. Some of the text includes phrases like "wasn't there", "in my car", "had no idea", and "never heard back". There are several lines struck out using a heavy pencil mark, indicating deletions or corrections made during this note-taking process. The document has a formal look, with header sections at the top that include dates and other information possibly related to the case's context.

PreviousPage 10 of 38Next