Documents tagged "handwritten"
Found 743 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-23.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with typed and handwritten text on it. The content of the text is not fully legible due to the angle and focus of the photo. However, some words can be discerned such as "Q: What did you do after dinner?" and "A: Yes." This suggests that the document might be a transcript or notes from an interview or deposition where questions were asked and answers given. The document is partially obscured by other sheets of paper, which are out of focus in the foreground. There is also a stamp or seal on the top left corner of the document.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.
EFTA00008920-p-19.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions. The questions appear to be about a specific individual's experiences during a period of time, potentially related to their living conditions, education, and personal history. Due to the quality of the scan and the angle of the photograph, it's challenging to read all the text clearly. However, some visible phrases include "Did you go through school?" and "What happened when you were 17?" The document seems to be a part of an interview or investigative record, possibly for legal or social service purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-15.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions on the subject of an individual's financial donations. The questions are posed as if for cross-examination in legal proceedings. There is a section titled "Q: Did he donate $10,000 to Lott?" followed by a response that reads, "Yes." Other questions inquire about donations and their context, such as the donation of an airplane to an organization. The document appears to be from the year 2004, as indicated in the upper right corner.
EFTA00008920-p-13.jpg
The image shows a handwritten note on a piece of paper with visible text that is partially redacted. The content includes questions and answers related to an interview or conversation with the subject mentioned as "Karen". Redacted areas cover personal details, but the redactions suggest this document may contain sensitive information about Karen's activities or interactions during a specific time period. The handwriting appears casual and there are some annotations made on the side of the page. The date is also redacted, making it impossible to provide an accurate time frame for when these notes were written.
EFTA00008920-p-11.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten text on it. The handwriting appears to be in black ink and seems somewhat messy. There are several lines of text, each starting with a question number followed by a question. The questions seem to relate to an interview or conversation, possibly for an investigation. For example, one line reads "Q: Did you ever discuss the case with [name redacted]?" Additionally, there is some visible editing on the document; certain parts of text are crossed out in red ink, indicating they have been removed or altered from the original text. The document appears to be a formal record, possibly related to a legal or professional context, given the structure and content of the questions.
EFTA00008920-p-09.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. It appears to be an interview transcript from the 1990s, as indicated by the date on the document. The title reads "Transcript of Interview" at the top. There are various questions listed with corresponding answers marked in black text. Some sections are circled or underlined, suggesting that they might be of particular importance or interest to someone reviewing the transcript. The style of the document is formal and informational, typical for legal or investigative records.
EFTA00008920-p-08.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a structured format that includes numbered questions and corresponding answers. Due to the resolution and angle of the scan, some words are not entirely legible. The visible parts of the text include phrases such as "Yes" and "No", indicating responses to inquiries. There is also some handwritten text on the document, including corrections or annotations. At the bottom right corner, there seems to be a signature followed by some illegible text, likely identifying an individual associated with the content of the document. The background is predominantly white, making the printed black text and markings stand out prominently.
EFTA00008920-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it. The document appears to be a list of questions for a jury during a trial. There are at least ten items on the list, each one beginning with "If you believe that" or "Do you think that" followed by a statement, suggesting that the questions are related to determining the thoughts or opinions of the jurors on various matters presumably pertaining to the case being tried. The handwriting is in black ink and covers several parts of the document. There's also some scribbled text in blue at the top, which seems to be annotations or corrections. The style of the image suggests it might have been taken quickly without a focus on aesthetics, likely for informational purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-03.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and some handwritten annotations. The document appears to be a page from an interview transcript or a record of questions and answers related to law enforcement inquiries or training, as suggested by the visible text that mentions "interview" and other topics that are typically associated with legal procedures or investigations. There are numbered lines where statements or answers were recorded, along with handwritten marks such as lines through some words or phrases, which could indicate corrections or deletions made during the review process. The document has a header with the name of an individual, followed by their title and an address that seems to be associated with a governmental agency or institution. The overall style of the image is straightforward, focusing on presenting textual information without any additional context or embellishments.
EFTA00008920-p-02.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text and handwritten annotations. The paper appears to be an official document related to criminal justice, possibly a police report or court documentation. Due to the resolution and angle, it is challenging to read all the details, but some visible words include "INVESTIGATION REPORT" at the top and a section titled "SUBJECT'S STATEMENT." There are also handwritten marks such as lines through text, highlighting certain parts with circles, and annotations in the margins. The document is signed by an individual whose name is not legible in this image.
EFTA00008892-p-26.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with text overlaying it, which is slightly blurred and makes some of the words difficult to read clearly. However, I can discern that the text involves questions, possibly in an interview setting or related to an investigation, as indicated by the presence of a respondent's name mentioned alongside statements like "Answer" and "Response." The document includes handwritten marks and highlights suggesting edits or emphasis on certain parts. There is no visible image within the document itself; it is text-based.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.
EFTA00008892-p-20.jpg
This is a low-resolution photograph showing what appears to be a piece of paper with some text and graphics on it. The text is partially obscured and includes words like "RECEIPT" and "CUSTOMER," suggesting that the image might be related to a transaction or an invoice. There's also a bar graph at the bottom right, but the details are too small to discern. A handwritten note or signature is visible in the upper left corner, indicating human interaction with this document. The background is nondescript and does not provide additional context about the setting or situation.
EFTA00008892-p-16.jpg
The image shows a printed document with handwritten annotations. The title of the document reads "May 3, 1999 Flight" and it appears to be related to flight operations or scheduling, given the presence of a list that includes names, numbers, and possibly codes or flight details. A red arrow points towards one part of the text on the document. There are also several circles with lines through them, indicating items crossed out or removed from consideration. The style of the image suggests it might have been taken by someone holding up the paper to a camera or scanner for documentation or sharing purposes.
EFTA00008892-p-12.jpg
The image is a scanned document featuring a letter from the InterContinental hotel chain to an individual named Christine. The date of the letter is December 21, 1993. It appears to be a personal letter, possibly regarding hotel accommodation or services during her stay. The hotel's logo is visible in the upper left corner of the document. There are handwritten notes on the letter, including highlighting and underlining certain text, which seems to indicate important information was communicated.
EFTA00008892-p-06.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with parts of it redacted or obscured by black lines. The visible portion of the text is at the bottom and includes numbers such as "49516" and words like "REPORT," but it's not clear what the context of the document is due to the redaction. There are also some handwritten notes on the paper which are similarly obscured by redacted areas. The image has a watermark or overlay text at the top left corner that reads "
EFTA00008892-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with text. It appears to be an official notice regarding a court case, specifically mentioning "UNITED STATES v. GISELE MERRITT" as the title. Below this title is additional information including "GRAND JURY PROCEEDING" and a date in June 2016. There's also text indicating that the document was received or signed on May 9, 2016. The document has a red stamp at the top left corner which seems to indicate it as "Copies for Distribution" with a handwritten note underneath "FOR THE COURT" and a number "75" in parentheses. The style of the image suggests it is a photograph or scan of an actual piece of paper, possibly from a legal proceeding or court system.