Documents tagged "id"
Found 2421 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-37.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and lines of writing. The style of the handwriting suggests that it is a manual transcription or notetaking from an interview or testimony, possibly related to court proceedings. The text includes questions like "Did you make any attempts to locate your husband" and "Did you ever discuss a divorce." Names such as "Susie" are mentioned, indicating individuals involved in the discussion or case. There are also phrases like "informant's father" and "her husband's car parked next to her house," which provide context about relationships and locations. The document appears to be an official record with headers and footers typically used in legal or investigative documentation.
EFTA00008920-p-36.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with a list of questions and answers handwritten on it. The writing appears to be related to an interview or discussion about someone's experiences or opinions, given the context provided by the visible text. Specific details about the questions and answers are not clear due to the angle and focus of the photograph. There is a mention of a specific date in March, but the full year is not visible. The paper has some lines crossed out with a pen, which could indicate corrections or edits made during the process of transcribing the information.
EFTA00008920-p-35.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text, which appears to be a form or checklist. The writing is in black ink on a light background. There are lines through some sections and words, indicating they have been crossed out, possibly as part of the process being documented. The visible text includes phrases like "interview summary" and what seems to be questions or prompts related to an interview or assessment session. There are also numbers next to each line, likely for checking off completed items. The image has a personal or confidential feel due to the nature of its content.
EFTA00008920-p-34.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes across it. The document appears to be a form or survey of some sort with sections numbered and questions listed below each number. There are lines for answers, but they have been redacted or obscured with black marks. At the top right corner of the page, there's a watermark that says "Confidential" in an italicized font. The text is too small to read, and any discernible information has been intentionally concealed.
EFTA00008920-p-33.jpg
The image shows a printed document with handwritten notes and annotations throughout. The text is small and difficult to read due to the quality of the photograph; however, it appears to be a form with multiple sections and questions that have been answered by someone. There are signatures at the bottom of the page, indicating where individuals have signed their names. A significant object in this image is the paper itself, which serves as the medium for both written information and handwritten responses.
EFTA00008920-p-32.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with redacted information across the entire page. It looks like an official form or report, possibly from a government agency or institution. The redactions are done in a way that covers entire lines and sections of text, ensuring sensitive information is not disclosed. The visible parts show headings such as "Q: 1" and a question at the bottom, but the content is obscured by black marks to maintain privacy or confidentiality. The document also contains a date stamp near the top, though it's difficult to read due to redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-28.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a series of questions and answers related to a legal case. The text on the paper has been redacted, covering up sensitive information and keeping it confidential. The layout suggests that this could be part of a deposition or an interview transcript where each question is followed by its corresponding answer, but the content is not visible in this image due to the redaction.
EFTA00008920-p-27.jpg
The image displays a typed document with handwritten annotations and corrections on the right side. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the heading "INTERVIEW OF WITNESS" followed by a date and the name of an individual, which is redacted. Below this title, there are sections labeled A through D, each containing numbered questions with corresponding answers. Section A starts with question 16 asking about the witness's knowledge of someone named "Peterson" who reportedly has access to a building on East 3rd Street. The handwritten annotations next to this question and others in section A highlight specific points or clarify certain responses. The document seems to be a record of an interview conducted as part of legal investigation, possibly related to a real estate case given the references to properties and individuals associated with them.
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008920-p-24.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten content. It appears to be a page from a legal case summary or notes taken during an interview or court proceeding. The page contains multiple numbered points with handwritten text that seems to be related to witness statements or questions asked. Some of the text includes phrases like "wasn't there", "in my car", "had no idea", and "never heard back". There are several lines struck out using a heavy pencil mark, indicating deletions or corrections made during this note-taking process. The document has a formal look, with header sections at the top that include dates and other information possibly related to the case's context.
EFTA00008920-p-23.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with typed and handwritten text on it. The content of the text is not fully legible due to the angle and focus of the photo. However, some words can be discerned such as "Q: What did you do after dinner?" and "A: Yes." This suggests that the document might be a transcript or notes from an interview or deposition where questions were asked and answers given. The document is partially obscured by other sheets of paper, which are out of focus in the foreground. There is also a stamp or seal on the top left corner of the document.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.
EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.
EFTA00008920-p-19.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions. The questions appear to be about a specific individual's experiences during a period of time, potentially related to their living conditions, education, and personal history. Due to the quality of the scan and the angle of the photograph, it's challenging to read all the text clearly. However, some visible phrases include "Did you go through school?" and "What happened when you were 17?" The document seems to be a part of an interview or investigative record, possibly for legal or social service purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-17.jpg
The image displays a page of written notes with an overlaid redacted stamp at the top left corner, obscuring certain details such as names and dates. The text appears to be related to a legal case or investigation, with questions and answers structured in columns labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers. There are references to individuals involved, possibly witnesses or suspects, but their identities are not revealed due to the redaction. The page has been photocopied multiple times as indicated by the faded quality of the text and the visible copies behind it.
EFTA00008920-p-16.jpg
The image is a scanned document with multiple pages that seem to be questionnaires or interview questions related to aviation, specifically regarding an incident at the Dulles International Airport in Virginia. Each page contains a series of numbered questions, such as "Question: What is your name?" and "Question: When did you first learn about the incident at Dulles International Airport on 9/11?" Some pages are partially obscured or rotated, making it difficult to read all the text in full. There is visible handwriting that appears to be annotations or corrections, with some lines marked through by a pen. The style of the document suggests an official investigation or fact-finding process conducted after an event at the mentioned airport.
EFTA00008920-p-15.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed responses to questions on the subject of an individual's financial donations. The questions are posed as if for cross-examination in legal proceedings. There is a section titled "Q: Did he donate $10,000 to Lott?" followed by a response that reads, "Yes." Other questions inquire about donations and their context, such as the donation of an airplane to an organization. The document appears to be from the year 2004, as indicated in the upper right corner.
EFTA00008920-p-13.jpg
The image shows a handwritten note on a piece of paper with visible text that is partially redacted. The content includes questions and answers related to an interview or conversation with the subject mentioned as "Karen". Redacted areas cover personal details, but the redactions suggest this document may contain sensitive information about Karen's activities or interactions during a specific time period. The handwriting appears casual and there are some annotations made on the side of the page. The date is also redacted, making it impossible to provide an accurate time frame for when these notes were written.