Documents tagged "id"
Found 2421 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers typed out on lined paper. The top part is partially obscured, but one can see that it contains a date and the word "question" followed by the number "1." Below this, there are two visible questions: "What was your profession?" and "Where were you born?" The corresponding answers seem to be blanked out with red lines or stamps, making them unreadable. There is a name at the bottom of the document that appears to read "JOHN DOE" in capital letters. This is typically a placeholder for an individual's actual name when discussing legal matters or anonymity. The image also includes what seems to be a logo or emblem to the right, but it is not clear enough to discern any specific details. Overall, the document appears to be part of an interview or investigation, possibly related to law enforcement or court proceedings, given the style and content visible in the image.
EFTA00008920-p-11.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten text on it. The handwriting appears to be in black ink and seems somewhat messy. There are several lines of text, each starting with a question number followed by a question. The questions seem to relate to an interview or conversation, possibly for an investigation. For example, one line reads "Q: Did you ever discuss the case with [name redacted]?" Additionally, there is some visible editing on the document; certain parts of text are crossed out in red ink, indicating they have been removed or altered from the original text. The document appears to be a formal record, possibly related to a legal or professional context, given the structure and content of the questions.
EFTA00008920-p-10.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with a table containing questions and answers related to a legal proceeding or investigation. The document appears to be a transcript of testimony given by a person named "Randall A. Cunningham" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2004. The handwriting is visible, suggesting that the responses were written out during the interview. There are lines drawn through certain text, indicating that it has been redacted or removed for confidentiality purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-08.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a structured format that includes numbered questions and corresponding answers. Due to the resolution and angle of the scan, some words are not entirely legible. The visible parts of the text include phrases such as "Yes" and "No", indicating responses to inquiries. There is also some handwritten text on the document, including corrections or annotations. At the bottom right corner, there seems to be a signature followed by some illegible text, likely identifying an individual associated with the content of the document. The background is predominantly white, making the printed black text and markings stand out prominently.
EFTA00008920-p-07.jpg
The image is a scanned document with visible handwriting and typed text on it. It appears to be an interview transcript or notes from a conversation between individuals whose names are redacted, as indicated by the placeholders "(Male)" and "(Female)." The content of the text includes questions such as "How long have you been here?" and "What is your relationship with (Redacted Name)?" The document has a number at the top right corner that reads "439," which may indicate its sequence or reference number within a larger set of documents. The page also includes additional text at the bottom that seems to be a standard footer with possibly the interview date and time, though this detail is not clearly legible in the image provided.
EFTA00008920-p-06.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or conversation. The handwriting style suggests it was written by hand. There are several questions listed with corresponding answers provided below each question. The text on the page includes visible letters and numbers, but due to the quality of the scan and the angle at which the image is taken, some words are not entirely legible. The document seems to be related to a formal interview or discussion with specific topics and responses.
EFTA00008920-p-03.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and some handwritten annotations. The document appears to be a page from an interview transcript or a record of questions and answers related to law enforcement inquiries or training, as suggested by the visible text that mentions "interview" and other topics that are typically associated with legal procedures or investigations. There are numbered lines where statements or answers were recorded, along with handwritten marks such as lines through some words or phrases, which could indicate corrections or deletions made during the review process. The document has a header with the name of an individual, followed by their title and an address that seems to be associated with a governmental agency or institution. The overall style of the image is straightforward, focusing on presenting textual information without any additional context or embellishments.
EFTA00008920-p-02.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text and handwritten annotations. The paper appears to be an official document related to criminal justice, possibly a police report or court documentation. Due to the resolution and angle, it is challenging to read all the details, but some visible words include "INVESTIGATION REPORT" at the top and a section titled "SUBJECT'S STATEMENT." There are also handwritten marks such as lines through text, highlighting certain parts with circles, and annotations in the margins. The document is signed by an individual whose name is not legible in this image.
EFTA00008920-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and markings that are partially obscured due to blackouts. The title of the document is "Civil Action No." followed by a number, indicating it's from a legal proceeding in a court. There are also headings such as "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" and "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The name "Brian Stelter" appears on the document, but it is blacked out, suggesting that this could be part of sensitive or private information. The bottom right corner features a stamp or mark indicating "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIALITY." The overall style of the image suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, possibly involving a person whose name is redacted due to confidentiality. The document appears to have been used or handled, as indicated by creases and marks.
EFTA00008892-p-28.jpg
The image is of a printed document with text that appears to be an interview transcript. The text is partially obscured by black lines across sensitive information, likely names and other personal details. It includes phrases like "Q: What did you testify?" and "A: I never gave." There's also visible text that reads "I never saved" followed by a line that could be part of the name "Mrs. Kirstein" which is crossed out with black lines. The style of the image suggests it might have been scanned or photographed, as there are some shadows and uneven edges around the document, indicative of a physical copy rather than a digital original.
EFTA00008892-p-26.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with text overlaying it, which is slightly blurred and makes some of the words difficult to read clearly. However, I can discern that the text involves questions, possibly in an interview setting or related to an investigation, as indicated by the presence of a respondent's name mentioned alongside statements like "Answer" and "Response." The document includes handwritten marks and highlights suggesting edits or emphasis on certain parts. There is no visible image within the document itself; it is text-based.
EFTA00008892-p-25.jpg
The image appears to be a photo of a document or printed material. The top part of the document contains text that reads "July 22, 2016 Deposition" suggesting this is related to a legal proceeding scheduled for July 22, 2016. There's also a redacted section that seems to contain personal information or sensitive details, as indicated by the black lines covering the content. The text is in English and is written in a standard font commonly used for formal documents. The background of the image shows some indistinct elements which do not provide clear additional context.
EFTA00008892-p-23.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text, which appears to be a question and answer format. The visible portion of the text includes a question that begins "Q: Did Geoffrey Ptak have a scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual purposes?" followed by an answer that is partially obscured. Only the first few words of the answer are clear: "Mr. Radiclava, I don't know what you are talking about." The style of the image looks like it may have been taken with a camera or a smartphone, capturing the printed document in an unprofessional manner. There is no visible person or location depicted on the paper itself. The text suggests that this might be related to some sort of official or legal proceeding, as indicated by the formal language and context of the question posed.
EFTA00008892-p-21.jpg
The image appears to be of a scanned document with several sections redacted using a black ink overlay. The redactions are irregularly shaped and obscure the content beneath them. There is visible text on one side of the page that has not been redacted, but it's too small to read clearly in this description. Additionally, there are some numbers at the bottom right corner, also too small to be legibly described here. The overall quality of the image suggests it may have been taken with a scanner or a photograph of an actual document.
EFTA00008892-p-20.jpg
This is a low-resolution photograph showing what appears to be a piece of paper with some text and graphics on it. The text is partially obscured and includes words like "RECEIPT" and "CUSTOMER," suggesting that the image might be related to a transaction or an invoice. There's also a bar graph at the bottom right, but the details are too small to discern. A handwritten note or signature is visible in the upper left corner, indicating human interaction with this document. The background is nondescript and does not provide additional context about the setting or situation.
EFTA00008892-p-19.jpg
The image shows a digital presentation slide with the title "February 12, 1995 Flight" in bold, centered font at the top. The slide contains a table with various columns, each headed by text such as "Flight Number," "Route," "Origin," and several others that are not fully visible. There is red-colored highlighting on parts of the text within the table, indicating areas of importance or focus for this presentation. In the lower right corner of the slide, there's a watermark with a series of numbers "012643" overlaid diagonally across the image in a lighter shade of gray. The style of the image is typical for a business or academic presentation.
EFTA00008892-p-18.jpg
The image displays a presentation slide with a table and some text annotations. The title of the slide is "January 3, 1995 Flight", suggesting that the content pertains to a flight schedule from January 3rd, 1995. There's a red arrow pointing at a section of the table which includes numerical data and possibly flight times or information related to specific days within that period. The text is too small to read in detail, but it appears to be part of an educational or informational presentation, possibly regarding historical flights or aviation statistics from that time.
EFTA00008892-p-17.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with several areas redacted, typically done to obscure sensitive information such as personal details or confidential data. At the top of the page, there is some text that appears to be a title or heading, but it's obscured by the redaction marks. Below this, the name "Mr. John Smith" is visible, suggesting it could be an application form or similar document where names are required for identification purposes. The address and date fields are also partially redacted; however, you can see that they refer to a location in New York City on February 15th, but the year is obscured. There's no context provided about the purpose of the document or why it has been redacted, as this would typically be determined by any additional information not visible in the image.
EFTA00008892-p-16.jpg
The image shows a printed document with handwritten annotations. The title of the document reads "May 3, 1999 Flight" and it appears to be related to flight operations or scheduling, given the presence of a list that includes names, numbers, and possibly codes or flight details. A red arrow points towards one part of the text on the document. There are also several circles with lines through them, indicating items crossed out or removed from consideration. The style of the image suggests it might have been taken by someone holding up the paper to a camera or scanner for documentation or sharing purposes.
EFTA00008892-p-15.jpg
The image you've shared is not clear enough for me to provide a detailed description of the content within it. If there are specific parts of the image you would like me to describe, please let me know, and I will do my best to assist you!