Documents tagged "legal"
Found 296 documents with this tag
EFTA00008744-p-074.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be a typed transcript or record of an interview or deposition. The top part of the page contains visible text, including numbers (e.g., "1") and questions with answers, but specific details are obscured by redacted lines running across them, making it impossible to read the content. There is also a date stamp in the upper right corner that seems to be partially covered by redacted material. The style of the document suggests an official or legal context.
EFTA00008744-p-073.jpg
The image shows a document with typed text, possibly a transcript of a conversation or an interview. The paper is marked with a header that includes the word "Answers" in a bold font, suggesting it's part of a question-and-answer exchange. There are several questions and answers listed, with the text partially obscured by black rectangles, likely to redact sensitive information. Some phrases like "just to make sure we got this right" and "understood properly" indicate that accuracy or understanding is being confirmed during the conversation. The document appears to be an official record of a legal proceeding or professional interview.
EFTA00008744-p-072.jpg
The image shows a printed document with a table format containing a list of questions and answers. The content appears to be related to a legal proceeding or deposition, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: Was there any indication that the witness was lying?" and "A: Yes - [redacted] had seen him in a place he shouldn't have been." The text is black on a white background, and there are redacted sections within the answers where specific information has been obscured with solid lines for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document also contains headers at the top left corner and footers with page numbers, indicating that this is one page of a larger report or transcript. The overall style of the image suggests it may be an official record, possibly related to a legal investigation or trial.
EFTA00008744-p-070.jpg
The image shows a document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings. The document is printed and contains handwritten annotations. At the top, there's a section with "Q" marked as Question, followed by a line for an answer. There are several lines below this format, suggesting multiple questions and answers. One visible question reads, "What did you think when you learned about the new trial in September 1974?" The corresponding handwritten answer says, "I was afraid that I would be found guilty again." This indicates a personal account from someone who has previously faced legal consequences. The document is dated and signed at the bottom by an individual whose name and title are partially obscured. The visible part of the signature includes what seems to be "Court Reporter," suggesting that this person is responsible for taking down and transcribing statements during the proceedings.
EFTA00008744-p-066.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes on it. The notes are organized into numbered items, suggesting a list of questions or topics for discussion. Some of the text in the notes is redacted, indicating sensitive or confidential information that has been obscured. The redaction is done by drawing lines through the text to make it unreadable. The document appears to be formal, possibly related to an investigation or legal proceedings given the context and style of the notes. There are no people visible in the image, as the focus is on the text and its content.
EFTA00008744-p-063.jpg
The image displays a document with various sections of text and numbers arranged in columns. The top portion of the text is redacted or obscured by black marks, making it unreadable. Below this, there are lines numbered from 26 to 35, each followed by a question mark. The questions are not clearly visible due to the quality of the image and the redaction. The visible part of the text includes phrases such as "did you talk with" and "you told me that..." which suggest an interview or questioning context. There is also visible text mentioning dates like "10/31/2017," indicating a specific day in October 2017. The document has a formal appearance, resembling an official report, transcript of testimony, or a question and answer list from an investigation. The presence of the date suggests that this might be related to legal proceedings or records.
EFTA00008744-p-062.jpg
The image shows a handwritten note on paper with lines and numbers at the top, suggesting it could be part of an official document or interview transcript. The writing is in black ink, and there are some words crossed out with red pen, indicating corrections or emphasis on particular phrases. The person's name mentioned in the note appears to be "Commander Kevin Ralston"; however, the text is partially obscured by redaction marks that replace parts of the text with asterisks. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, consistent with official records or legal documents.
EFTA00008744-p-059.jpg
The image shows a printed document with black ink on white paper. It appears to be a court transcript with numbered lines and text that includes questions and answers, indicating an exchange between individuals during a legal proceeding. The specific content of the questions and answers is not detailed due to the resolution of the image and the need for privacy in such documents. There are redacted sections where certain information has been intentionally obscured. At the top right corner, there's a time stamp that reads "03/26/2014" indicating when this page or part of it was transcribed. The style of the image is formal and informational, typically used for legal documentation.
EFTA00008744-p-058.jpg
The image displays a text document with black ink on white paper. The text is organized into numbered lines, suggesting it's structured like a list or questionnaire. However, the actual content of the text is obscured by various sections of redacted areas, preventing the reading of the original information. These redactions are consistent throughout the document and obscure large chunks of the text. The style of the image indicates it may be an official paper, possibly from a legal or governmental context, given the formal layout and use of redacted content.
EFTA00008744-p-057.jpg
The image displays a page of handwritten notes or interview questions and answers, possibly related to an investigation or an assessment process, such as a psychological evaluation. There are several lines of text with different question numbers followed by the words "Answer" indicating where responses should be written. The content is partially redacted with black marks obscuring some information for privacy or legal reasons. The paper has a yellowish hue and appears to be aged, suggesting it might be from an older case or document.
EFTA00008744-p-056.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with black and white text that is slightly blurred and rotated approximately 90 degrees to the left. It seems to be an official paper, possibly related to court proceedings or legal matters, as indicated by the header "REPORTER'S RECORD" at the top left corner. The visible portion of the text includes phrases like "THE COURT: Are you representing yourself?" and a response that suggests someone is acting as their own attorney in court. Due to the resolution and orientation, further details are difficult to discern.
EFTA00008744-p-051.jpg
The image shows a page of typed text on a document, which appears to be a legal transcript from an interview or deposition given by an individual named "Kathleen". The document is numbered at the bottom left corner with "31" and includes headers for sections such as "Q" and "A". There are several lines crossed out in black marker throughout the text, indicating portions that have been redacted or deemed sensitive. Additionally, there's a handwritten note on the page saying "No redactions - not related to case" with an arrow pointing downwards towards the text, suggesting instructions for handling this document.
EFTA00008744-p-050.jpg
The image appears to be a photocopy of a document with some redacted sections, which are indicated by black lines through the text. It contains handwritten notes and text on what seems to be lined paper, possibly from an interview or an investigation given the nature of the questions and answers. The visible portions of the text include phrases like "Did you ask her?", "Yes, she did," and "She stayed with a friend at their apartment," suggesting inquiries about actions taken by an individual referred to as 'she'. There are references to locations such as a motel room, but specific details have been redacted for privacy or security purposes. The document is likely used for official records or legal proceedings due to its layout and the nature of the information it contains.
EFTA00008744-p-049.jpg
The image displays a document that appears to be a list of questions and answers from an interview or deposition related to a legal case or investigation. The document is filled with typed text and some handwritten annotations in red ink, indicating corrections or changes. The background of the page is slightly blurred, making it difficult to read all the content clearly. There are no people visible in the image, and the focus is entirely on the text-based document itself.
EFTA00008744-p-046.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings, as suggested by the phrases "judge", "counsel", and "court record". However, most of the text has been redacted or obscured in black ink, making it difficult to discern the full details. A date stamp on the document indicates that it was received on October 19th, 2015. The visible part of one question reads: "Q: Did you have occasion to be at a particular address".
EFTA00008744-p-032.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper that appears to be an official document with typed text on it. The document has a header with the date "09/27/19" and a footer containing a logo and phone number, suggesting it might be related to a legal or administrative process. There are several lines of black text with question numbers (e.g., Q15) followed by questions and answers, which seem to be related to aviation matters. The document has a formal layout typical of official forms or inquiries used in court cases or government proceedings.
EFTA00008744-p-030.jpg
The image displays a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The document appears to be an official report or a legal transcript, possibly from a court proceeding or investigative interview. It contains sections labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers, suggesting a structured questioning format. In the visible portions of the text, there are references to New York City locations such as Times Square and Central Park, indicating that the subject matter pertains to events or individuals associated with these places. The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain parts of the document, likely to indicate redactions or areas of emphasis. There is also a highlighted section with an arrow pointing at it, which might be drawing attention to a specific part of the text for further discussion or reference. The image quality is not high enough to read all the details of the text, but the overall layout and annotations suggest a formal and serious nature for the content of the document. The style of the image is realistic with no artistic modifications, focusing solely on the reproduction of the physical documents.
EFTA00008744-p-025.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text that appears to be a list of questions and answers, possibly from an interview or testimony. The writing is in black ink on white paper, with the first line beginning "Q." indicating the question followed by the corresponding answer in the next line. There are several visible questions, each prefixed with "Q." indicating they are being posed to someone. At the bottom of the page, there's a partial date which reads "05/12/2011." The text is slightly blurred and some parts have been redacted with a black marker for privacy or legal reasons.
EFTA00008744-p-024.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document or a printed paper with several lines of text that have been redacted or blacked out for privacy or security purposes. The visible parts of the text seem to be organized in question-and-answer format, but due to the redaction, specific details about the questions and answers are not clear. There is also a footer at the bottom of the page that includes additional information. It contains a phone number (866) 452-7019, an email address (<EMAIL>), and an indication of the author or owner's name with a redacted surname ("Terry"). The document is dated "09/30/2021" at the top right corner. The style of the image suggests it might be related to an interview transcript or some form of legal or investigative documentation, given the format and the presence of questions and answers. However, without more context, the exact nature of the document remains speculative due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-023.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with handwritten notes, possibly taken from a meeting or interview. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its cursive nature and the quality of the photo. There are several lines of text that seem to contain questions and answers related to an interaction between individuals. Some sections of the text have been redacted with black marker, obscuring the content for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document itself has a formal appearance, suggesting it might be used in professional or legal contexts.