Documents tagged "redacted"
Found 176 documents with this tag
EFTA00001955-p-1.jpg
The image appears to be a collage of various photographs placed on a wooden surface. In the center, there's a vintage Polaroid picture with multiple redacted sections where faces and other details have been obscured by black bars. To the left of this central photo, there are two more pictures; one looks like a standard landscape print with trees, while the other is less clear but seems to feature people in an outdoor setting. The image also contains text, likely pertaining to the redacted photo, reading "EXTRA" in a bold font, which suggests that this might be part of an album or collection that is sorted by topic or category.
EFTA00001884-p-1.jpg
The image shows an official letter and a corresponding envelope lying flat on a surface with a tiled pattern that appears to be a floor. The letter is addressed to a recipient named "Dr. [Name Redacted]" at a specific location in the United States. It includes a return address for "United Nations Headquarters" in New York City, which suggests an association with an official document from a government or international organization. There are no visible texts that would indicate the contents of the letter or the context of its delivery. The image is taken from an angle where both the front and back of the envelope can be seen, but it is not possible to read any confidential information due to redacted text.
EFTA00001263-p-1.jpg
The image shows an interior view of a hallway leading to a room with the door open. There's a redacted area on the right side of the image that obscures part of the doorway and the adjacent wall. The color tone is muted, suggesting either artificial lighting or possibly a photo taken in low light conditions. The walls appear to be plain with a yellowish hue. There are no visible texts, people, or significant objects apart from the door frame and the redacted area on the right.
DOJ-OGR-00007506.jpg
The image displays a document with various sections of text and possibly some graphical elements obscured by redacted markings. The visible parts include what seems to be the heading "RE: Your Request on [Redacted] Pursuant to the [Redacted]" followed by additional paragraphs that are too small or unclear to read in detail. The style of the image is formal, resembling a professional letter or legal document. The redacted portions indicate sensitive information has been intentionally obscured for privacy or security reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00006911.jpg
The image shows a page with a printed document, possibly from an official report or legal transcript. It is marked as "Page 5" at the top right corner, indicating that it's part of a multi-page document. The text contains several paragraphs of black ink on white paper. There are no people visible in this image, and the location cannot be discerned with certainty from the information provided. The style of the text suggests a formal or legal setting, and there is a handwritten note that says "[Redacted]" next to one part of the text, indicating sensitive information has been removed for privacy or security reasons.
DOJ-OGR-00002424.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with a letter printed on it. The document appears to be formal or official due to its layout and the presence of what seems to be typed text and redacted areas, which are typically used in legal documents to obscure sensitive information. There is also a digital watermark at the top right corner with the text "Redacted." This suggests that the original content has been edited to protect confidentiality, such as for reasons related to privacy or security. The paper's color is white, and there appears to be a barcode on the bottom left corner, which may indicate an internal tracking system within an organization. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects other than the text on the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00026033.jpg
The image displays a printed document with various sections and texts that are partially obscured by red markings indicating corrections or changes to be made. The visible text includes phrases such as "COMPANY" and "PRODUCT," suggesting a business-related context. There is also a section labeled "SERVICE ORIGINATOR INFORMATION," which typically contains details about the service provider or organization originating the document. Redacted elements suggest this image may be sensitive or confidential in nature. The style of the text is typical for official documents with structured headings and fields.
DOJ-OGR-00025785.jpg
The image shows a printed document with the title "FY2019 Service Wide Performance Update" at the top. There is red text highlighting certain areas on the page, suggesting important information has been called out for attention. The body of the text is too small and blurry to read in detail, but it appears to be structured into sections and bullet points, typical of an official report or update summary. At the bottom of the page, there is a line that reads "To: [Redacted]," indicating the recipient of this document. The style of the image suggests a scanned or photographed printout with slight distortions due to the angle at which it was captured.
DOJ-OGR-00022381.jpg
The image appears to be a black and white document with several sections obscured by redaction marks, typically used to indicate that the content within those areas has been intentionally removed or is considered sensitive information. The text on the document is not fully legible due to the redactions, but there are visible words such as "Redacted" and "Section", which suggest that parts of the document have been censored for privacy or security reasons. The style of the image is a standard photocopy or digital scan of printed paper with visible lines indicating its layout on the original sheet.
DOJ-OGR-00022326.jpg
The image shows a document with some information redacted, which means parts of the content are intentionally obscured, usually for privacy or security reasons. The redaction marks cover words and numbers across different lines, making them illegible. There is visible text around the redacted areas, but the specific content within those areas is concealed. There is also a watermark on the bottom right corner that reads "Redacted" in a diagonal orientation, indicating that this document has been intentionally altered to remove sensitive information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033589.txt
The document discusses a book by Patterson that could be published in August, which presents some time frame issues for the recipients. They are advised to pursue a competing book or documentary after that, and to consider Trump as an opportunity to make their story about something other than themselves while framing their own narrative. It is suggested that they go public with an op-ed, television interview, and social media efforts, and that a strategic plan involving their public identity, philanthropic activities, and development of media allies should be put in place.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding a case involving someone named Jane Doe. The conversation includes topics such as the scheduling of depositions for Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Trump, service on Maxwell, and an emergency protective order. It is not clear from this summary who Mr. Trump or Ms. Maxwell are, but they may be parties involved in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of service on two individuals named Maxwell and Trump, who are likely defendants in a legal case. The names are redacted to maintain confidentiality. The emails also reference Jane Doe as a plaintiff or witness in the case. Jacquie Johnson appears to be a paralegal at Burman Critton Lutier & Coleman, and Jessica Cadwell is another individual involved in the discussion. The content of the emails suggests that efforts are being made to obtain information from these individuals for legal purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of legal proceedings involving a person named Jane Doe and another individual. Key people in the conversation include Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Jacquie Johnson, and Maxwell. The conversations take place between August 11 and 12, 2009, and refer to efforts to serve legal documents on various individuals involved in the case. The location of these emails is West Palm Beach, FL.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032975.txt
The document is an email conversation between Jeffrey E. and Darren Indyke about updates on a business matter. It mentions the use of checks for payments but suggests that wires might be more convenient due to time differences and travel schedules. The communication also includes some personal information, indicating a close relationship between the individuals involved.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032968.txt
The document involves several people discussing business-related topics. Etienne Binant and Lang Caroline are mentioned as important contacts. Trump's presence in the discussion suggests a potential political angle to their work. The focus is on making an impact on young, talented individuals in the art industry by supporting them directly rather than through galleries, which allows them to reach a broader audience.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032964.txt
In this email exchange from February 2017, Jeffrey E. and Etienne Binant discuss the status of a project they are working on together. They mention that they have been busy due to Trump's activities, but they are now ready to start on the project. They also discuss the importance of going directly to the source for their artists, as galleries can help them reach a broader audience. It is suggested that Jeffrey E. should go to LA or Berlin in order to meet with some of these artists in person.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032892.txt
The email conversation involves several people discussing an inquiry from the WSJ about a Jane Doe case involving Trump and Epstein. The email chain includes Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Darren Indyke, Joe Palazzolo, a staff reporter at the WSJ, and Jeffrey E. Jeevacation@gmail.com. It appears that they are discussing how to respond to the inquiry from the WSJ regarding the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032861.txt
The email discusses attorney-client privilege and mentions a book being published about Patterson. The author suggests using Trump as an opportunity to create a counter narrative to the book and offers advice on how to handle public appearances. There is also a mention of creating a strategic plan involving philanthropic activities, media allies, and social media efforts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032657.txt
The document is an email between Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Epstein, with information about their law firm, contact details, and confidentiality notices. The content of the emails appears to be sensitive or confidential, given the presence of attorney-client privilege notices and references to "inside information".