Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "transcript"

Found 141 documents with this tag

EFTA00009016-p-001.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed list on paper, possibly from an interview transcript or survey results. The title reads "What you believe and why" followed by several numbered questions with corresponding answer choices. Each question is accompanied by multiple lines labeled as 'a' through 'c' or more, providing different response options for the interviewee or respondent to choose from. The font is typewriter-like, suggesting a vintage or old-fashioned setting. There are no visible people, locations, or other significant objects in the image apart from the printed text.

EFTA00008920-p-73.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes, which appears to be a transcript of an interview or conversation. There are numbered lines indicating questions and responses. The content is related to someone's activities and intentions in relation to another person, with statements like "I want to make sure that I have the right amount of sexual contact" and "I don't want to get into anything that's going to result in an arrest or something like that." The document also includes phrases such as "sexual assault," "physical contact," and references to specific places and times. The handwriting suggests a personal touch, possibly indicating the notes were taken by a human rather than being printed from a computer.

EFTA00008920-p-72.jpg

The image appears to be a document with printed text and handwritten notes on it. The document is partially obscured by a redaction, which is marked with black lines, covering certain parts of the text. There are visible numbers at the top right corner that seem to indicate page numbering or possibly dates. Handwritten text includes questions and answers related to an investigation or interview, though specific details are not clear due to the redacted sections. The document's style is typical for official records or transcripts, with a serious tone suggested by its content and presentation.

EFTA00008920-p-67.jpg

The image shows a document with written content that appears to be of an official nature, possibly related to legal proceedings or a formal investigation. The text is partially obscured by a redacted section at the top, indicating sensitive information has been removed. The visible text includes questions and answers formatted in a structured manner, suggesting it's part of a questionnaire or interview transcript. There are several question numbers listed such as "Q: 5" and "Q: 8" followed by corresponding responses labeled "A:" which stands for answer. The document is marked with the date "3/12/97" and has a reference number "601" in the top right corner, suggesting it's part of a larger case or file system.

EFTA00008920-p-62.jpg

The image shows a document with multiple pages that appear to be a court transcript, given the formal layout and structure. The top page has visible handwritten notes, possibly annotations or corrections. There's a red pen mark through some of the text on this page, indicating deletion or correction. Due to the resolution and angle, specific details such as names, locations, and significant objects are not fully legible. The document is printed in black ink on white paper, and there's a visible watermark across it that reads "Docket Entry/Order - 52978536" followed by what seems to be a timestamp "11-04-99 07:40 PM." The quality of the image is low, which makes it challenging to read the text clearly.

EFTA00008920-p-57.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it, possibly an interview transcript or some form of record. It is difficult to read the content due to the angle and quality of the scan. However, there are visible lines and words, including names such as "Lisa" and phrases like "how long ago was that?" and "she had a thing for him," which suggest that the document is related to an interview or conversation with a person named Lisa. The overall style of the image suggests it might be from a legal proceeding or an investigation.

EFTA00008920-p-56.jpg

The image is a scanned document with text and headings. The background appears to be a faded gray color, suggesting an aged paper. At the top left corner of the page, there's some handwritten text that seems to indicate someone's name, possibly related to the content of the document. The main body of text includes lines numbered from 1 to 36, each beginning with a question and followed by a response or answer in quotation marks. The questions seem to be about personal experiences or opinions on certain topics, and they are addressed to someone named "Christine." The topics covered include her relationship status, whether she has spoken to anyone recently, how often she's been talking to someone named Jeffery, and if there's anything she wants to discuss or any concerns that need addressing. The document is titled "INTRODUCTION TO THE INTERVIEW" at the top center of the page. The style of the text varies from typed questions and answers to handwritten annotations, such as the name and possibly some notes or corrections. The overall impression is of an interview transcript with personal information redacted for privacy.

EFTA00008920-p-48.jpg

The image shows a document with typed content on it. The document appears to be a report or transcript of an interview or conversation, as indicated by the presence of questions and answers listed in sections A through C. The text is too small to read clearly, but there are visible headings such as "A" followed by numbers 1 through 7, suggesting the questions were categorized or labeled accordingly. Additionally, there are sub-headings under "C" with more numbered points. At the top of the document, there's a date mentioned in the text: "5/2/96," which provides context for when this interview took place or was written up. The style of the image is that of an official paper record, possibly from a legal or medical case file.

EFTA00008920-p-41.jpg

The image is of a document with a header that reads "COURT REPORTER" followed by the date "6/27/01" and a page number "113" in the top right corner. It appears to be a transcript from a court proceeding, as indicated by the numbered questions (Q) and answers (A). The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to contain statements made by individuals during the course of legal proceedings. There's also a mention of a person named "MARTIN" in one of the responses. The overall style of the image suggests an official court document with typed content and handwritten notes or corrections on some lines.

EFTA00008920-p-40.jpg

The image shows a printed document with text that appears to be a transcript of an interview or conversation. The document is numbered from one to sixteen, suggesting a structured set of questions or topics discussed. However, the majority of the text within these numbers has been redacted or obscured by black marks, making it impossible to read the contents of the conversation. The style of the image is that of a physical copy with handwritten redaction marks.

EFTA00008920-p-38.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with several lines of text that are partially obscured by redacted lines. The visible text includes what seems to be a question and answer session format, as indicated by the headings "Q" and "A" followed by actual questions and answers respectively. However, most of the content is hidden due to the redaction process. The document also contains some personal information at the bottom that has been redacted for privacy purposes. This includes a name, an address, and a phone number, which are typically used for identification or contact purposes in official documents. The quality of the image is not very high, making it difficult to discern finer details clearly. The layout suggests this could be part of an interview transcript, court proceeding notes, or some kind of investigative report where personal details and potentially sensitive information have been intentionally concealed.

EFTA00008920-p-37.jpg

The image shows a document with various texts and lines of writing. The style of the handwriting suggests that it is a manual transcription or notetaking from an interview or testimony, possibly related to court proceedings. The text includes questions like "Did you make any attempts to locate your husband" and "Did you ever discuss a divorce." Names such as "Susie" are mentioned, indicating individuals involved in the discussion or case. There are also phrases like "informant's father" and "her husband's car parked next to her house," which provide context about relationships and locations. The document appears to be an official record with headers and footers typically used in legal or investigative documentation.

EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.

EFTA00008920-p-28.jpg

The image is a scanned document with a series of questions and answers related to a legal case. The text on the paper has been redacted, covering up sensitive information and keeping it confidential. The layout suggests that this could be part of a deposition or an interview transcript where each question is followed by its corresponding answer, but the content is not visible in this image due to the redaction.

EFTA00008920-p-26.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed document with multiple paragraphs of text. The text appears to be a transcript or a report related to an interview or testimony given by a person named "Herman Brown" at the "U.S. Court House" on "1/5/78" at 9:40 AM. Several parts of the text are redacted with black lines, obscuring information that is not meant to be visible. The overall style of the image suggests it is a formal document from a legal or official proceeding.

EFTA00008920-p-23.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document with typed and handwritten text on it. The content of the text is not fully legible due to the angle and focus of the photo. However, some words can be discerned such as "Q: What did you do after dinner?" and "A: Yes." This suggests that the document might be a transcript or notes from an interview or deposition where questions were asked and answers given. The document is partially obscured by other sheets of paper, which are out of focus in the foreground. There is also a stamp or seal on the top left corner of the document.

EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.

EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg

The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.

EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg

The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.

EFTA00008920-p-10.jpg

The image is a photograph of an official document with a table containing questions and answers related to a legal proceeding or investigation. The document appears to be a transcript of testimony given by a person named "Randall A. Cunningham" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2004. The handwriting is visible, suggesting that the responses were written out during the interview. There are lines drawn through certain text, indicating that it has been redacted or removed for confidentiality purposes.

PreviousPage 2 of 8Next