Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "transcript"

Found 141 documents with this tag

EFTA00008744-p-080.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it, which appears to be an interview transcript. The text is black and includes various questions and answers that are too small to read clearly in this description. There's no specific location or significant object identifiable from the provided details.

EFTA00008744-p-077.jpg

The image displays a piece of paper with written content, which appears to be a transcript or a printed document. It contains lines of text that are organized into segments separated by page numbers at the top right corner. Some words and phrases in the text are redacted with black marks, obscuring them from view. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, with no decorative elements and primarily functional content.

EFTA00008744-p-074.jpg

The image shows a document that appears to be a typed transcript or record of an interview or deposition. The top part of the page contains visible text, including numbers (e.g., "1") and questions with answers, but specific details are obscured by redacted lines running across them, making it impossible to read the content. There is also a date stamp in the upper right corner that seems to be partially covered by redacted material. The style of the document suggests an official or legal context.

EFTA00008744-p-073.jpg

The image shows a document with typed text, possibly a transcript of a conversation or an interview. The paper is marked with a header that includes the word "Answers" in a bold font, suggesting it's part of a question-and-answer exchange. There are several questions and answers listed, with the text partially obscured by black rectangles, likely to redact sensitive information. Some phrases like "just to make sure we got this right" and "understood properly" indicate that accuracy or understanding is being confirmed during the conversation. The document appears to be an official record of a legal proceeding or professional interview.

EFTA00008744-p-072.jpg

The image shows a printed document with a table format containing a list of questions and answers. The content appears to be related to a legal proceeding or deposition, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: Was there any indication that the witness was lying?" and "A: Yes - [redacted] had seen him in a place he shouldn't have been." The text is black on a white background, and there are redacted sections within the answers where specific information has been obscured with solid lines for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document also contains headers at the top left corner and footers with page numbers, indicating that this is one page of a larger report or transcript. The overall style of the image suggests it may be an official record, possibly related to a legal investigation or trial.

EFTA00008744-p-065.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The paper appears to be a transcript of an interview or statement, as indicated by the numbered lines that correspond to questions (Q) and answers (A). There's visible text on the paper which seems to be obscured for privacy or security reasons. There are black marks covering parts of the document, presumably to conceal sensitive information such as names or personal details. The overall style of the image is straightforward and informational, with a focus on readability despite the redactions.

EFTA00008744-p-064.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document, specifically an interview record or transcript of a conversation between a police officer and a witness. The conversation seems to be related to a case involving a woman named "Susan." There are several questions and answers listed under the headings "Q:" for questions and "A:" for answers, indicating the exchange between the two individuals. Due to the angle and quality of the image, it's difficult to read all the text clearly. The document is on paper with visible lines and a header or footer that includes some sort of identification number. The style of the image suggests it was taken casually, possibly from an angle that obscures part of the document.

EFTA00008744-p-063.jpg

The image displays a document with various sections of text and numbers arranged in columns. The top portion of the text is redacted or obscured by black marks, making it unreadable. Below this, there are lines numbered from 26 to 35, each followed by a question mark. The questions are not clearly visible due to the quality of the image and the redaction. The visible part of the text includes phrases such as "did you talk with" and "you told me that..." which suggest an interview or questioning context. There is also visible text mentioning dates like "10/31/2017," indicating a specific day in October 2017. The document has a formal appearance, resembling an official report, transcript of testimony, or a question and answer list from an investigation. The presence of the date suggests that this might be related to legal proceedings or records.

EFTA00008744-p-062.jpg

The image shows a handwritten note on paper with lines and numbers at the top, suggesting it could be part of an official document or interview transcript. The writing is in black ink, and there are some words crossed out with red pen, indicating corrections or emphasis on particular phrases. The person's name mentioned in the note appears to be "Commander Kevin Ralston"; however, the text is partially obscured by redaction marks that replace parts of the text with asterisks. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, consistent with official records or legal documents.

EFTA00008744-p-059.jpg

The image shows a printed document with black ink on white paper. It appears to be a court transcript with numbered lines and text that includes questions and answers, indicating an exchange between individuals during a legal proceeding. The specific content of the questions and answers is not detailed due to the resolution of the image and the need for privacy in such documents. There are redacted sections where certain information has been intentionally obscured. At the top right corner, there's a time stamp that reads "03/26/2014" indicating when this page or part of it was transcribed. The style of the image is formal and informational, typically used for legal documentation.

EFTA00008744-p-054.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed document. The text on the document appears to be an interview transcript with questions and answers regarding someone's recollections of their past experiences. The person being interviewed has mentioned college classes, high school friends, and working at a store over the weekend. The last visible question asks if they remember anything specific about the other kids in their class or any other important things that happened during that time. The document is marked with numbers on the left side, likely indicating page numbers (e.g. "26"), and there are handwritten notes and underlines throughout the text, possibly for emphasis or clarification by a reader or reviewer of the transcript.

EFTA00008744-p-051.jpg

The image shows a page of typed text on a document, which appears to be a legal transcript from an interview or deposition given by an individual named "Kathleen". The document is numbered at the bottom left corner with "31" and includes headers for sections such as "Q" and "A". There are several lines crossed out in black marker throughout the text, indicating portions that have been redacted or deemed sensitive. Additionally, there's a handwritten note on the page saying "No redactions - not related to case" with an arrow pointing downwards towards the text, suggesting instructions for handling this document.

EFTA00008744-p-047.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten content and several questions and answers. The person whose responses are provided is identified as "John" on the line at the top. The document appears to be an interview transcript, given the format of question numbers followed by corresponding answers. The text is redacted in multiple places across the document, obscuring certain details that would normally be visible. There are also a few visible phrases such as "Yes," "No," and what seems to be a name "William." At the bottom right corner of the image, there's a portion of text that is too small to read clearly.

EFTA00008744-p-044.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document or paper, possibly from an interview or court transcript due to the structure and context suggested by the visible text. The paper has numbered questions on the left side, which are followed by "Answer" sections on the right for responses. The content is partially redacted with black lines obscuring some information, indicating that sensitive details have been concealed. The document includes handwritten notes, possibly annotations or corrections, in blue ink. There's also a date mentioned at the top of the page. The quality of the image and the paper suggests it might be an older or scanned document.

EFTA00008744-p-038.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and text on it, which appears to be a transcript of an interview or a report of some sort. The text is too small to read clearly, but it includes questions and answers, as indicated by the layout where a question is followed by an answer. There are also sections with headings such as "PERSON'S NAME" and "QUESTION #" which suggests that this document is structured to record information systematically. At the bottom of the page, there seems to be a signature or initials next to a date, indicating approval or certification of some sort. The document has a formal layout and is likely related to an official inquiry or investigation.

EFTA00008744-p-036.jpg

The image shows a portion of a typed document, which appears to be an interview transcript or notes from an investigation. The text is partially redacted with black lines, obscuring sensitive information or names. The visible content includes phrases such as "she went" and "she was." There are question marks indicating areas where questions were asked, and the word "answer" followed by a line suggesting that responses have been redacted. At the top of the image, there is an illegible date, which suggests when the document may have been created or the event took place.

EFTA00008744-p-035.jpg

The image displays a document with text that appears to be handwritten on lined paper. The writing is somewhat small and may include questions and responses, as suggested by the presence of numbered items followed by answers or comments. Some words are obscured by black marks, possibly for privacy or clarity reasons. The style of the text resembles that of a court transcript or interview notes. There's no identifiable information about people, locations, or significant objects apart from the text itself.

EFTA00008744-p-033.jpg

The image shows a page of handwritten notes with text and various marks including lines through some words. The writing appears to be responses to questions, possibly from an interview or discussion as indicated by the context and structure of the text. There are sections titled "Q" for questions followed by "A" for answers. There's also a signature at the bottom right corner with a date written beneath it. This document looks like it could be related to investigative work, such as a police report or interview transcript.

EFTA00008744-p-030.jpg

The image displays a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The document appears to be an official report or a legal transcript, possibly from a court proceeding or investigative interview. It contains sections labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers, suggesting a structured questioning format. In the visible portions of the text, there are references to New York City locations such as Times Square and Central Park, indicating that the subject matter pertains to events or individuals associated with these places. The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain parts of the document, likely to indicate redactions or areas of emphasis. There is also a highlighted section with an arrow pointing at it, which might be drawing attention to a specific part of the text for further discussion or reference. The image quality is not high enough to read all the details of the text, but the overall layout and annotations suggest a formal and serious nature for the content of the document. The style of the image is realistic with no artistic modifications, focusing solely on the reproduction of the physical documents.

EFTA00008744-p-028.jpg

The image shows a handwritten document with a series of numbered questions and answers, which appear to be related to an interview or survey of some sort. The text is written in black ink on lined paper, with the questions listed vertically on the left side and corresponding answers written next to each question. There are also sections with redacted information, where words have been obscured with black lines, indicating confidentiality or privacy concerns. At the bottom of the page, there's a redacted line that seems to contain contact information or credentials related to the document's author or distributor. The style of the image is candid and utilitarian, typical of an official record or transcription from a conversation or interview.

PreviousPage 4 of 8Next