Documents tagged "Also"
Found 85 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032476.txt
The email discusses Michael Wolff's plans to write a book about Donald Trump and his need for introductions and off-the-record perspective on White House procedures from Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler. Jeffrey E. has agreed to assist him in meeting with these individuals while he is in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032475.txt
The document is a series of emails between Michael Wolff, who is working on a book about Donald Trump for a significant amount of money, and Jeffrey E. The emails discuss introducing Wolff to Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler, as well as the current state of affairs in Washington D.C. where everyone is lawyering up.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032474.txt
In the email exchange, Michael Wolff mentions that he is writing a book about the first 100 days of President Trump's administration and would like to speak with Tom Barrack. He also requests an introduction to Kathy Ruemmler for some off-the-record perspective on White House procedures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032471.txt
The document is an email from Michael Wolff to Jeffrey Epstein, dated February 15, 2017. Wolff mentions that he is working on a book about Donald Trump and asks for help in meeting with Tom Barrack and Kathy Ruemmler to gain insights into the White House's procedures. He also expresses interest in introducing himself to Epstein as a journalist who can be trusted.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt
This document appears to be an email chain discussing the attorney-client privilege, with several key figures mentioned including Martin G. Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke. The topic of a book by Patterson is also discussed in relation to the need for an immediate counter narrative and potential strategies such as going public and using social media efforts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032248.txt
This message discusses the potential impact of a book being published in August on various plans and strategies. It suggests pursuing an immediate counter narrative involving Trump as an opportunity to make the story about something other than the sender's own story while also giving them political cover. The sender is asked to consider their willingness to go public with this plan, which would involve writing an op-ed, doing a high profile television interview, and engaging in social media efforts. It also mentions the need for a strategic plan involving the sender's public identity, philanthropic activities, and media allies, suggesting that it could be an expensive effort.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails discussing the publication of a book by Patterson in August. The main concern is about competing book or documentary projects before that time frame. Trump is suggested as an opportunity for an immediate counter narrative, which would involve becoming an anti-Trump voice and going public with a message. A strategic plan involving the individual's public identity, philanthropic activities, media allies, and social media efforts is also recommended.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032244.txt
The document is an email from Michael Wolff to Jeffrey Epstein about a book by Patterson that presents some time frame issues. Wolff suggests using Trump as an opportunity for a counter narrative and becoming an anti-Trump voice, but this would require going public. Wolff also recommends developing a strategic plan involving media allies, philanthropic activities, and the public identity. If not, they risk having Patterson produce a bestselling book with tabloid copy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032239.txt
The document discusses a meeting between Michael Wolff and Jeffrey E. on February 19, 2016, where they discuss the topic of Trump. They also mention that Ehud Barak is scheduled to speak at an event. The document warns about unauthorized use or disclosure of confidential information contained within it.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032238.txt
In the document, Michael Wolff sends an email to Jeffrey Epstein about President Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton's campaign. The New York Times has contacted Wolff regarding information about Epstein and Trump, and Wolff advises Epstein to consider taking preemptive action. The email also mentions that Hillary Clinton's campaign is digging deeply into the matter.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032048.txt
The document discusses conspiracy theories surrounding a plane crash that killed the President of Poland. The author believes these theories are without evidence and an insult to the memory of those who died. They argue that there would be no political or diplomatic benefits for either Russia or the Prime Minister's party to have been involved in sabotage or subterfuge, and that any such accusations are slanderous. The author also suggests that early presidential elections might go in favor of the President's party due to a sympathy vote.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt
The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Jay Lefkowitz, discussing a series of questions about Epstein's life and activities. The questions focus on topics such as his involvement with the Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation, his business clients, time spent in prison, social life changes, relationships with individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell, reactions to his conviction, thoughts on his sentence, charity initiatives, and personal side of the story. The document mentions that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt
This email exchange involves journalist Alexandra Wolfe asking for an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to discuss his science foundation and the impact of his conviction on his business and social life. The emails were forwarded by Jay Lefkowitz, who was cc'd in one of them.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
The document is an email conversation between a certified paralegal and others, discussing the service of papers to individuals named Maxwell, Wexner, and Trump. The focus is on whether these individuals have been personally served or if it was someone at their location who accepted the papers on their behalf. The context of the emails suggests that this relates to a legal matter involving Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031736.txt
The author expresses concern about an American president visiting Saudi Arabia for a summit meeting with Arab and Islamic state leaders, suggesting that this is not appropriate unless the president holds a high-ranking position such as Caliph. The author also criticizes the lack of transparency and potential exploitation by the United States regarding its relationship with Saudi Arabia. Additionally, the author raises concerns about the new Caliph's intentions towards Israel, indicating that he wants to empower it more and potentially leave Arab lands behind.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031640.txt
In an email exchange, Zubair Khan discusses a model that predicted Trump's victory in the U.S. presidential election based on social media data analysis. The project was unable to sustain itself due to financial constraints and the need for a Data Scientist. Zubair expresses interest in revisiting the idea when he has a powerful investable idea, with plans to focus on cyber security in the meantime.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031560.txt
This document discusses the political bias of individuals involved in an investigation related to President Trump and other topics, such as Strzok's testimony, McCabe's involvement, and the use of emails as evidence. The author acknowledges personal and professional concerns with crooked prosecutors but remains committed to fighting bullies and unethical legal practices.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031540.txt
This document discusses the importance of evidence when making accusations and the need for change in the electoral system. It mentions key figures such as George W. Bush, Al Gore, Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, and Vladimir Putin. The author expresses concern about the current state of politics and society, but also holds out hope for resistance and change.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031521.txt
Zubair Khan, a data analyst, sent an email to Jeffrey E. after checking the report again and confirming that only Wisconsin was incorrectly predicted in the US presidential election. Zubair explained that while Clinton had a positive spike after being cleared by the FBI, Trump dominated social media positively during the last week before the election. However, their prediction of Trump becoming president was based on analyzing data from 3 days and ignoring historic data, which they failed to account for without a Data Scientist. Zubair is now focusing on cyber security and will reach out if he has a powerful investable idea.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031518.txt
The document discusses the results of an analysis conducted on data from social media platforms for the US presidential election in 2016, with a focus on predicting the outcome. The analysis was done using historical data and took into account both Clinton's and Trump's performance on social media. It predicts that Trump will be the next president of the US. However, it is noted that there is an important question left unanswered regarding how much historic data must be analyzed to make accurate predictions. This could have been addressed with the help of a Data Scientist. The author concludes by mentioning their plans to focus on cyber security and reach out if they have any investable ideas.