Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Docket"

Found 48 documents with this tag

EFTA00008920-p-62.jpg

The image shows a document with multiple pages that appear to be a court transcript, given the formal layout and structure. The top page has visible handwritten notes, possibly annotations or corrections. There's a red pen mark through some of the text on this page, indicating deletion or correction. Due to the resolution and angle, specific details such as names, locations, and significant objects are not fully legible. The document is printed in black ink on white paper, and there's a visible watermark across it that reads "Docket Entry/Order - 52978536" followed by what seems to be a timestamp "11-04-99 07:40 PM." The quality of the image is low, which makes it challenging to read the text clearly.

EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.

EFTA00004055-p-1.jpg

The image shows a piece of paper with printed and handwritten text. The visible printed text includes "ITEM WAS I NOT SCANNED" in bold letters at the top, followed by "Description:" where there is space for writing an explanation, but no actual description is written here. Below that, additional information has been added in pen, but it's not entirely clear due to the quality of the image and the handwriting. At the bottom of the paper, there's a small section titled "Official Docket Instructions" with a date mentioned as "July 7, 2015." This indicates that the document might be related to some official documentation process or an inventory system where items are expected to be scanned for record-keeping purposes. The paper appears to be part of an internal manual or guide, possibly within a professional or administrative setting.

DOJ-OGR-00007494.jpg

The image shows a digital document with the top portion of a page. The visible text includes the words "Case Number" and "Docket Entry #1968," followed by a larger text that reads "EXHIBIT 1." Below this heading, there is smaller text indicating "Page 2 of 375" and further down, a date which appears to be "05-16-04." The document's watermark or background includes diagonal lines across the entire page, creating a cross-hatch effect. The style of the image suggests it is a screenshot taken from a computer program used for legal or official documents.

DOJ-OGR-00007293.jpg

The image shows a document with printed text on it. The top of the page has a header that includes what appears to be a case number and other legal information such as "Docket Number", "Date Filed", and "Page Number". Below this header is the main body of text which seems to be related to legal proceedings or court documents. The font is black and the paper is white with some visible creases or folds, suggesting it may have been handled physically. There are no images or graphics besides the printed text.

DOJ-OGR-00007265.jpg

The image is a photograph of a printed document with visible text and a header. The header indicates that the page belongs to "Docket No: 1576132," suggesting this could be part of a legal proceeding or court case. There are several numbered paragraphs on the page, but the resolution of the image makes it difficult to read the specific content of the text. The document appears to be an official legal paper, possibly a court filing or a transcript from a hearing.

DOJ-OGR-00007193.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be a court filing. The document contains printed text and has redacted sections where sensitive information is obscured. There are headers at the top with page numbers and case identifiers such as "Filed-Case#" and "Docket #", suggesting this is part of an official legal proceeding. The visible text includes references to parties in the lawsuit, court rules, and procedural elements typical of a legal document.

DOJ-OGR-00007162.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with a header that includes the word "Docket" along with some numbers and dates. The content of the document is too small and blurred to read clearly, but there are visible paragraphs that seem to contain text. The font size varies within the document, suggesting different headings or sections. There's no clear indication of people, locations, or specific objects as they would be unidentifiable due to the low resolution and distortion of the scan.

DOJ-OGR-00007079.jpg

The image is a screenshot of an official document with various sections and headings that are partially obscured due to the angle and distance from which it was taken. The visible parts of the text include "Docket #" followed by a series of numbers, suggesting this could be a legal or administrative file number. Additionally, there's a date listed at the top right corner that appears to be in a format typically used for court filings or official records, such as December 20, 2019. The document seems to have text in both black and red ink, indicating different levels of emphasis or importance. The style of the document suggests it is likely associated with legal proceedings, policy reports, or a formal governmental document.

DOJ-OGR-00007056.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document, possibly a legal or official paper with dense text. The content includes lines like "Docket No: 2018-CA-457," "Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment," and "Defendant's Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment." There is a signature on the bottom right corner of the document, indicating it may have been signed by someone in an official capacity, such as a judge or a party involved in the proceedings. The image has a grayscale color scheme and the text is too small to read clearly without zooming in.

DOJ-OGR-00006792.jpg

The image displays a document, possibly a legal one, given the style and content of the text present. The document contains several paragraphs with headings and subheadings in bold text. The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to include phrases like "RESPONDENT'S" and other words that are typically associated with court or legal proceedings. At the bottom of the page, there appears to be a table with columns headed by "Docket Number," "Respondent," and possibly others, which suggests this document is part of a larger case file or docket sheet. The quality of the image is not high, making it difficult to read all the details with accuracy.

DOJ-OGR-00006534.jpg

The image is a digital photograph of an official document with a dense block of text that appears to be partially redacted, meaning certain parts have been blacked out for confidentiality purposes. The title "Docket Number 18-9725" suggests it's a legal or court-related document from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. There is visible text in the margins indicating page numbers and possibly dates or case references, but these details are not fully legible due to the redacted areas. The overall style of the image conveys a sense of official secrecy surrounding specific elements within the legal document.

DOJ-OGR-00006450.jpg

The image displays a page of printed text with a header at the top that reads "Docket No. 16-492" and includes a page number. The text appears to be from a legal document or court case proceedings, as indicated by phrases like "petitioner's brief" and references to laws and regulations. The content discusses matters related to energy efficiency programs for low-income households under the Energy Policy Act of 1992. The style of the image is informational and official, typically found in legal or government documents.

DOJ-OGR-00006313.jpg

The image is a scanned document with a header that includes the name "Michael M." and the words "RE: Docket No. 17672 - Final." It appears to be a legal or official document given the structure and font used. The visible text on the page seems to be part of an introduction or statement, as indicated by phrases such as "This is my opinion," followed by what looks like a signature at the bottom right corner. The quality of the scan shows some pixelation, especially noticeable in the darker areas.

DOJ-OGR-00022167.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a physical document with printed text. The document seems to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the term "Case Docket" at the top and references to case numbers and court actions such as "filing papers" and mentions of an "Appellate Division" and "Supreme Court." Additionally, there's a section titled "NOTICE OF MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING CASE" which suggests that one party is seeking to have the case dismissed. The text is dense and requires close reading for comprehension. No people or significant objects are visible outside of the text itself.

DOJ-OGR-00022126.jpg

The image appears to be a digital screenshot of a document that contains text. The top section of the document includes a header with various lines of information such as "Receipt: <0013> Docket Number: #9651," suggesting that this may be related to a legal or official record. Below the header, there's additional text which seems to include bullet points, numbers, and possibly some instructions or guidelines, but it is not entirely clear from this angle. The document is formatted in a way that indicates an organized structure for conveying information or directions. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects apart from the textual content of the document.

DOJ-OGR-00022120.jpg

The image shows a document with the title "United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit" at the top. Below that, there are sections titled "Case No." and "Docket No.," which are partially visible. The main body of text appears to be an order or decision related to a case. There is also a date mentioned in one part of the document. In the lower right corner, there is a signature, indicating it was likely signed by someone within the court system. The background of the image is a faded blue.

DOJ-OGR-00022074.jpg

The image displays a document with a header that reads "Docket No. W125/80" and "Page 76 of 91," suggesting it's part of a larger collection of papers. The visible text includes phrases such as "Application for Entry Clearance" and mentions locations like "New York" and "London," indicating that the document may be related to immigration or travel matters. The overall style of the image is straightforward, with a focus on textual information presented in a standard document layout.

DOJ-OGR-00021994.jpg

The image shows a document with text that appears to be a letter addressed to "Judge Foster." The date on the letter is mentioned as December 19, 2003. There are references to court documents and legal matters, including case numbers such as "Docket No. A-4763" and specific details about a case involving a person named "Dr. Baxter" with a medical background. The text mentions the involvement of an entity or organization referred to as "The State," and there's a sentence that discusses the defense of Dr. Baxter in court. The document seems formal, consistent with legal correspondence or a court-related letter.

DOJ-OGR-00021974.jpg

The image is a scanned document with a watermark at the top that reads "COURT EXHIBIT" followed by a file number and page number: "Docket #8062014 Document #13 Page 15." The text within the document is too small to read clearly, but it appears to be a legal or court-related document due to the watermark. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects that stand out in this image; the focus is entirely on the text of the document.

Page 1 of 3Next