Documents tagged "Doe"
Found 47 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965.txt
The document is a letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to John Zucker, Assistant Legal Counsel for ABC's Office of Legal Counsel, regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The lawyer represents Jeffrey Epstein and believes that the airing of the interview will be grossly negligent or worse because the accusations made by Jane Doe 3 are uncorroborated, have been refuted by other credible evidence, and were previously considered immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in a pending litigation. The lawyer also mentions that Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with an FBI investigation into Mr. Epstein eight years ago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt
The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt
This document discusses a new development in a sex scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein, a South Florida billionaire money manager who was accused of running an international underage sex ring. The story has resurfaced due to the efforts of Fort Lauderdale lawyer Brad Edwards, who is representing two alleged victims identified as Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, both of whom are claiming that well-known criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, were involved in Epstein's international sex ring. Dershowitz denies these allegations. The case is currently being heard in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, with a focus on the alleged victims' attempt to use the Crime Victims' Rights Act to force the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute Epstein for various offenses related to sex trafficking and prostitution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026854.txt
The document is a civil lawsuit case number 1:16-cv-04642-RA filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein by Jane Doe, who is proceeding under a pseudonym. The complaint was filed on June 20th, 2016, and the plaintiff is represented by Thomas F. Meagher from Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg & Bovino, LLP in Princeton, NJ. The case has been assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams and seeks relief for assault, libel, and slander under a diversity jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025874.txt
The email discusses a case involving the US government and a woman named Doe 3. The government opposes Doe 3 joining the case, and it is suggested that her story about former President Clinton is made up and can be proven false using secret service records and local Virgin Islands support. David Stern asks for confirmation on whether Doe 3 has been thrown out of the case against the US gov to reopen. The email also emphasizes the confidential nature of the information contained in it, warning unauthorized use, disclosure, or copying is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt
The document is a conversation between two individuals discussing world currencies and personal relationships. The participants mention specific currencies like bitcoin, pound, kroner, franc, sfr, and dollar. They also talk about a person named Andrew and someone referred to as Jane Doe 1 and 2, who are local strippers, and the sender's former girlfriend with whom he had an affair and tried to keep her out of his mess. The sender is considering making a statement about their relationship for reasons of respect and love for his former girlfriend. The conversation also touches on reputation management and protecting one's loved ones during difficult times.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014084.txt
The document is related to a court case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 who are filing a response in opposition to a motion for leave to file a supplement to a reply in support of a motion for limited intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs claim that an affidavit submitted by Jane Doe #3 in support of an unrelated pleading does not prove anything against them, and accuse Dershowitz of hiding the truth about his activities. They also point out that Dershowitz has failed to provide specific evidence to contest Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite claiming in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations are false.