Documents tagged "Id"
Found 2421 documents with this tag
EFTA00008744-p-105.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, possibly an official letter or report. The text on the page is partially redacted with black marks, obscuring certain words and phrases. It's not clear what the contents of the document are due to this redaction. There are no people visible in the image. The style of the document suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, given the context provided by the visible text, which seems to be part of a question or statement, possibly in response to something else mentioned earlier in the document that is now redacted.
EFTA00008744-p-104.jpg
The image is a scanned document, possibly an official paper such as a court transcript or a report with questions and answers listed in black ink. The quality of the scan is not perfect, which makes some text harder to read. The visible parts of the text include phrases like "My dad was shot" and "And did he know what happened?" suggesting that the document pertains to an investigation or legal proceeding involving a family member's involvement in a violent incident. There are also question numbers such as "123456789" and answer indicators like "Yes," but the full context is obscured by the poor quality of the scan. The text on the document provides some insight into the subject matter, but the details are not entirely clear due to the image's resolution.
EFTA00008744-p-103.jpg
The image you've shared is quite small and blurry, making it difficult to discern specific details. It appears to be a photograph of some printed material, possibly a document or a newspaper article with text that isn't fully legible due to the quality of the image. The text seems to be structured in question-answer format, suggesting an interview or a Q&A session. Due to the low resolution and blurriness, I can't provide more precise information about the content or context of the image.
EFTA00008744-p-102.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with typed text and handwritten annotations. The paper seems to contain notes or questions, possibly related to an interview or meeting given the context provided by some visible text like "Q: Did he say anything about his son?" There are several lines crossed out with what looks like a pen or pencil, indicating certain items were removed or deemed unimportant. The top right corner has a stamp that is partially obscured and includes phone numbers which suggests it might be related to an official organization or legal proceedings. The style of the text and annotations suggest it could be from an older document, possibly from the early 2000s given the date "2/14/2003" indicated in the top right corner.
EFTA00008744-p-097.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers that appear to be from an interview. The questions are listed on the left side of the page under numbers such as "1," "2," etc., while the corresponding answers are on the right. Specific text in the image is not detailed due to the limitations of my capabilities. However, the document has been redacted with black marks, obscuring certain sections of text and possibly personal or sensitive information. The style of the document suggests it might be a transcript from an interview or court proceeding.
EFTA00008744-p-094.jpg
The image shows a page of handwritten notes on lined paper. The text is somewhat obscured due to the angle and quality of the photo, but it appears to be related to an investigation, possibly a police report, given the references to statements made by witnesses or individuals involved in an incident. There are redacted parts where information has been deliberately covered up for privacy or security reasons. It's not clear what specific case this document refers to due to the redactions and the quality of the image.
EFTA00008744-p-093.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The text is redacted, with black lines covering some portions, presumably to conceal sensitive information. The redactions are scattered across the page, obscuring specific details that might be otherwise visible. The visible parts suggest this could be an interview transcript or a report summarizing conversations, as evidenced by phrases like "Q: Did you speak with Smith?" and "A: Yes." However, the identities of individuals mentioned in the notes are hidden due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-092.jpg
The image appears to be a redacted document, possibly from a legal case or an official investigation, given the context of the text and the formal nature of the layout. The document is structured with numbered questions (Q) followed by answers (A) that correspond to them, suggesting an interview transcript or questionnaire responses. However, due to the redaction marks covering most of the visible content, it's not possible to provide specific details about people, locations, objects, or the actual context of the document. The purpose of this image seems to be for illustrative purposes related to redacted documents and their presentation.
EFTA00008744-p-090.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text on it. It appears to be a legal transcription or notes from an investigation or court proceeding, as indicated by the context of the questions and answers. The document has several lines redacted with black marker strokes, concealing parts of the text. The visible portions include references to a person's statement about events, actions, and items associated with their case. The redaction suggests that some information is sensitive or confidential and is being kept from view.
EFTA00008744-p-089.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes that appear to be from an interview or meeting. The content is partially redacted with black lines, obscuring certain parts of the writing. The visible text includes phrases like "She then started screaming" and "she didn't know if he would shoot her." At the bottom, there's a phone number: (903) 874-5126, which seems to be associated with "Sheriff Smith." The style of the document is informal, resembling notes taken in real time during a conversation or an interview session.
EFTA00008744-p-088.jpg
The image is a black and white copy of an official document with text covering its entirety. The background has been altered to be completely white, which makes the text stand out more prominently. The text includes questions and answers that appear to be related to some form of investigation or inquiry, with phrases like "She was driving" and "Her boyfriend's car," suggesting a personal interview about an incident involving someone else. Specific details have been redacted from the document using black lines across relevant parts of the text, obscuring sensitive information. The overall style is formal and informational, typical of legal or investigatory documents.
EFTA00008744-p-086.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned copy of an official document, possibly from a court or government office. The document contains a table with columns titled "Case Number", "Date Filed", and other information that is typically associated with legal proceedings. There are multiple rows within the table, each representing a case or matter with details such as the type of action (e.g., "Civil Petition"), nature of suit (e.g., "Trespass"), and the names of parties involved in the litigation. The document is marked with stamps, indicating it has been processed or reviewed by a court clerk. Additionally, there are handwritten marks over some information, which could suggest corrections or annotations made by an individual handling the document.
EFTA00008744-p-085.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with multiple questions and answers listed on it. The questions seem to pertain to an event or situation where individuals are being interviewed or questioned. Due to the low resolution of the image and the quality of the scan, some words are difficult to read, but the text includes phrases like "Answer: No" and "Answer: Yes." There's a visible date at the top right corner that says "09/14/2018." The document has been redacted with black lines across various parts of it, obscuring some information. Additionally, there is a handwritten note in black ink on the bottom left that reads, "Q: How many times was he seen at her house? A: 5." The overall style of the image suggests an official or legal context for these questions and answers.
EFTA00008744-p-083.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed answers on it. The paper appears to be related to an investigation or interview process as indicated by the question "What was your interaction with Ms. Martin?" and other questions about specific individuals, interactions, or events, such as "Ms. Martin had some connection to massage" and "They were not wearing shirts," along with several other lines of inquiry that are too small to read in detail. The document is titled "Exhibit 1" at the top left corner. There is no visible text about people's locations or any significant objects aside from what appears to be a question-and-answer format.
EFTA00008744-p-081.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or testimony, possibly from a court proceeding. The page has numbered lines with handwritten responses on it, and the content of the questions and answers is redacted (blacked out) for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This indicates the text contains sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. There are no visible texts, people, locations, or significant objects in this description due to the redaction of the information. The image itself is a photograph of a physical document rather than an artistic composition or a digitally created illustration.
EFTA00008744-p-080.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it, which appears to be an interview transcript. The text is black and includes various questions and answers that are too small to read clearly in this description. There's no specific location or significant object identifiable from the provided details.
EFTA00008744-p-078.jpg
The image shows a document with black text on white paper. The text appears to be redacted with lines drawn through it, obscuring the content. There are no visible people in this image, and the location is not identifiable from the contents of the page. The significant objects are the redactions themselves, which have been made intentionally to conceal certain information within the document. The style of the text suggests that this might be a formal or legal document due to the presence of redacted sections, typically used in official reports or legal proceedings to hide sensitive data.
EFTA00008744-p-075.jpg
The image is a scanned document, primarily textual with a few handwritten annotations. It appears to be an official form or report, possibly from a legal or law enforcement context given the content and format. The top of the document includes various sections with headers such as "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE" and "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT FOR THE INFANT CHILD." The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to consist of questions (labeled Q) followed by answers (labeled A). The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain words or phrases, which could indicate redaction, correction, or emphasis. There's also a handwritten note on the right side that says "See page 10" next to what appears to be a date "7/3/2011." The document is filled with lines and text in a structured format, typical of formal written records, suggesting it could be part of an investigation or legal proceedings where evidence and statements are documented.
EFTA00008744-p-072.jpg
The image shows a printed document with a table format containing a list of questions and answers. The content appears to be related to a legal proceeding or deposition, as indicated by phrases such as "Q: Was there any indication that the witness was lying?" and "A: Yes - [redacted] had seen him in a place he shouldn't have been." The text is black on a white background, and there are redacted sections within the answers where specific information has been obscured with solid lines for privacy or confidentiality reasons. The document also contains headers at the top left corner and footers with page numbers, indicating that this is one page of a larger report or transcript. The overall style of the image suggests it may be an official record, possibly related to a legal investigation or trial.
EFTA00008744-p-071.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The notes appear to be related to some form of testimony or questioning session, as there are multiple questions and responses written down in black ink. One of the visible questions is "A. Did you both see what happened on December 29th?" followed by the word "Yes" indicating an answer to that question. There's also a mention of a person named "Mr. Baird," suggesting that he is someone involved in or related to the context of these notes. The text "Rachel" and "Larry" are also visible, potentially referring to individuals mentioned during the session. The handwriting suggests that it was written by an individual who is likely male based on the script's style.