Documents tagged "Investigation"
Found 139 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-72.jpg
The image appears to be a document with printed text and handwritten notes on it. The document is partially obscured by a redaction, which is marked with black lines, covering certain parts of the text. There are visible numbers at the top right corner that seem to indicate page numbering or possibly dates. Handwritten text includes questions and answers related to an investigation or interview, though specific details are not clear due to the redacted sections. The document's style is typical for official records or transcripts, with a serious tone suggested by its content and presentation.
EFTA00008920-p-71.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a document with some blacked-out sections, suggesting that sensitive information has been redacted. The visible parts show what seems to be an affidavit or statement from an individual who is identified as a witness for the prosecution in a court case, likely related to a criminal investigation or trial. There are checkboxes and spaces for answers next to questions about the witness's identity, their knowledge of the subject matter, and whether they would like the opportunity to read any questions aloud. The name of the person making the statement is redacted, as well as other details that could potentially reveal personal information or compromise the legal process. The document has a formal layout with headers and numbered paragraphs, indicating it is an official court document.
EFTA00008920-p-67.jpg
The image shows a document with written content that appears to be of an official nature, possibly related to legal proceedings or a formal investigation. The text is partially obscured by a redacted section at the top, indicating sensitive information has been removed. The visible text includes questions and answers formatted in a structured manner, suggesting it's part of a questionnaire or interview transcript. There are several question numbers listed such as "Q: 5" and "Q: 8" followed by corresponding responses labeled "A:" which stands for answer. The document is marked with the date "3/12/97" and has a reference number "601" in the top right corner, suggesting it's part of a larger case or file system.
EFTA00008920-p-64.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes that appear to be related to an interview conducted by the FBI on December 17th, 2019. The focus of the notes seems to be the questioning about emails, specifically whether the subject mentioned checking emails before or after certain events. There are multiple questions listed and answered with "Yes" or "No." The document appears to be a legal record, possibly from a criminal investigation or court proceeding, given the context provided by visible text on the page.
EFTA00008920-p-57.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with handwritten notes on it, possibly an interview transcript or some form of record. It is difficult to read the content due to the angle and quality of the scan. However, there are visible lines and words, including names such as "Lisa" and phrases like "how long ago was that?" and "she had a thing for him," which suggest that the document is related to an interview or conversation with a person named Lisa. The overall style of the image suggests it might be from a legal proceeding or an investigation.
EFTA00008920-p-51.jpg
The image displays a page with handwritten notes on lined paper. The title at the top of the page reads "Questionnaire for Witnesses". The text is organized into numbered questions and bullet-pointed answers. The content refers to specific individuals, places, and events, though some words are crossed out or redacted, making parts of the information obscured. There is a date at the bottom of the page, indicating when it was written. The writing suggests that this document is part of an official investigation or inquiry process.
EFTA00008920-p-50.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and printed text. The handwriting is on the left side of the page and appears to be in blue ink, providing answers to numbered questions or points raised in what seems to be a deposition or an interview setting. On the right side, there's printed text that includes a date "5/12/04" at the top right corner and is followed by additional information such as names and possibly roles or affiliations of individuals. The document has a formal appearance, suggesting it could be related to legal proceedings or an official investigation.
EFTA00008920-p-46.jpg
The image shows a document with a list of questions on it. The document appears to be related to an investigation or interview, as indicated by the presence of questions such as "What was your relationship with [REDACTED]?" and other inquiries that seem to delve into personal relationships and events. There are also sections where answers have been redacted, which implies confidentiality in certain areas. The document has a header at the top, possibly containing the title or subject matter of the interview or investigation.
EFTA00008920-p-29.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document, possibly an interview transcript or statement record, with several lines of handwritten text. The document appears to be from an official proceeding due to the structured layout, numbering of questions, and the use of abbreviations such as "Q" for question and "A" for answer. There are some sections where text has been redacted with black lines covering it, indicating sensitive information is being concealed. The visible parts of the text include a reference to a specific date and time, which suggests that this document may be part of a court case or legal investigation. Additionally, there's a section titled "Docket Number" and other headings like "Question" followed by "Answer," implying an interview format. There are no visible images or people in the image; it is entirely text-based on a white background.
EFTA00008920-p-27.jpg
The image displays a typed document with handwritten annotations and corrections on the right side. The document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by the heading "INTERVIEW OF WITNESS" followed by a date and the name of an individual, which is redacted. Below this title, there are sections labeled A through D, each containing numbered questions with corresponding answers. Section A starts with question 16 asking about the witness's knowledge of someone named "Peterson" who reportedly has access to a building on East 3rd Street. The handwritten annotations next to this question and others in section A highlight specific points or clarify certain responses. The document seems to be a record of an interview conducted as part of legal investigation, possibly related to a real estate case given the references to properties and individuals associated with them.
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.
EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.
EFTA00008920-p-17.jpg
The image displays a page of written notes with an overlaid redacted stamp at the top left corner, obscuring certain details such as names and dates. The text appears to be related to a legal case or investigation, with questions and answers structured in columns labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers. There are references to individuals involved, possibly witnesses or suspects, but their identities are not revealed due to the redaction. The page has been photocopied multiple times as indicated by the faded quality of the text and the visible copies behind it.
EFTA00008920-p-16.jpg
The image is a scanned document with multiple pages that seem to be questionnaires or interview questions related to aviation, specifically regarding an incident at the Dulles International Airport in Virginia. Each page contains a series of numbered questions, such as "Question: What is your name?" and "Question: When did you first learn about the incident at Dulles International Airport on 9/11?" Some pages are partially obscured or rotated, making it difficult to read all the text in full. There is visible handwriting that appears to be annotations or corrections, with some lines marked through by a pen. The style of the document suggests an official investigation or fact-finding process conducted after an event at the mentioned airport.
EFTA00008920-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers typed out on lined paper. The top part is partially obscured, but one can see that it contains a date and the word "question" followed by the number "1." Below this, there are two visible questions: "What was your profession?" and "Where were you born?" The corresponding answers seem to be blanked out with red lines or stamps, making them unreadable. There is a name at the bottom of the document that appears to read "JOHN DOE" in capital letters. This is typically a placeholder for an individual's actual name when discussing legal matters or anonymity. The image also includes what seems to be a logo or emblem to the right, but it is not clear enough to discern any specific details. Overall, the document appears to be part of an interview or investigation, possibly related to law enforcement or court proceedings, given the style and content visible in the image.
EFTA00008920-p-11.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten text on it. The handwriting appears to be in black ink and seems somewhat messy. There are several lines of text, each starting with a question number followed by a question. The questions seem to relate to an interview or conversation, possibly for an investigation. For example, one line reads "Q: Did you ever discuss the case with [name redacted]?" Additionally, there is some visible editing on the document; certain parts of text are crossed out in red ink, indicating they have been removed or altered from the original text. The document appears to be a formal record, possibly related to a legal or professional context, given the structure and content of the questions.
EFTA00008920-p-10.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with a table containing questions and answers related to a legal proceeding or investigation. The document appears to be a transcript of testimony given by a person named "Randall A. Cunningham" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2004. The handwriting is visible, suggesting that the responses were written out during the interview. There are lines drawn through certain text, indicating that it has been redacted or removed for confidentiality purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-03.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed text and some handwritten annotations. The document appears to be a page from an interview transcript or a record of questions and answers related to law enforcement inquiries or training, as suggested by the visible text that mentions "interview" and other topics that are typically associated with legal procedures or investigations. There are numbered lines where statements or answers were recorded, along with handwritten marks such as lines through some words or phrases, which could indicate corrections or deletions made during the review process. The document has a header with the name of an individual, followed by their title and an address that seems to be associated with a governmental agency or institution. The overall style of the image is straightforward, focusing on presenting textual information without any additional context or embellishments.