Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Iowa"

Found 5 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032324.txt

This document summarizes the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the US election based on captured tweets from November 1st. The chances of winning for both candidates are listed, as well as their respective chances of winning in various US states.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029962.txt

The document is an email exchange between two individuals, one of whom mentions having received more votes than Jeb Bush in Iowa and the other mentions being in St. Thomas and going scuba diving. The email also contains a confidentiality notice stating that its contents are confidential and intended only for the addressee's use.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029958.txt

The sender, INW, discusses getting more votes than Jeb Bush in Iowa and being a possible delegate to the Republican convention. They also mention visiting St. Thomas and suggest putting a fake shark or statue under the water for scuba divers. The email is sent to Jeffrey Epstein and Lesley Groff.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt

The sender of the email discusses potential third-party presidential candidates in response to current political events and asks for thoughts on specific attributes for a candidate. The sender acknowledges that the 2018 elections are shaping up to be a referendum on President Trump and that there is no sign of the Mueller investigation's impact ebbing. The sender raises questions about the effectiveness of traditional two-party politics in addressing the current political climate and suggests the need for a back-up plan in case the system fails again.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt

The document discusses the political situation in the United States, focusing on the upcoming fall elections and the battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. The author suggests that unless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these events will leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield as the 2016 Presidential election. The author also raises the question of whether we want to break the current political system and nominating process for selecting candidates in 2020.