Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Presidential"

Found 13 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028994.jpg

The image is a circular graph with two different pie charts, each representing data from the U.S. Presidential Election 2016. The top chart shows "Live Feeds" with categories such as Neutral, Positive, and Negative, each represented by a slice of the pie. The bottom chart displays "Weekly Reports" divided into the same three categories: Neutral, Positive, and Negative. Each category's percentage is indicated on its respective slice. The text mentions the names "Donald Trump" and "Hillary Clinton," suggesting these are the candidates being analyzed in the data represented by the charts.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028993.jpg

The image is a digital slide with text related to the US Presidential Election of 2016. The title at the top reads "Live Feeds - US Presidential Election 2016" in bold white letters against a black background. Below the title, there are two bullet points providing information about social media analytics and insights from the election process. However, the content of these bullet points is not entirely visible or legible due to the image's resolution and size. The style of the image is simplistic, with no additional graphics or images aside from the text.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033334.txt

This email discusses the expected presence of President Trump at Palm Beach International Airport (PBI) from December 21st to January 6th, and notifies recipients that there will be a Presidential Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR) in place during this time. The sender is identified as Larry Visoski and he is providing the information for planning purposes.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt

The document presents an update on the US Presidential Election performance of candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It states that since the start of the second presidential debate, 3.1 million tweets have been processed. The positive, neutral, and negative percentages for each candidate are provided, as well as their winning chances. Additionally, the winning chances in various US states are highlighted for both candidates.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032952.txt

This document is an email exchange regarding the presidential inauguration of Donald Trump. Tom Barrack has invited Sultan Bin Sulayem to attend the event, but Sultan is unsure whether or not he should accept the invitation. The key people involved are Jeffrey E, who sent the original email, and Sultan Bin Sulayem. The topic at hand is the upcoming inauguration ceremony for Donald Trump.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032949.txt

This email exchange involves two individuals discussing the possibility of attending a presidential inauguration. One person is expressing concerns about crowding and whether it would be possible to shake hands with the president. The other individual suggests that meeting him before or after the event in Washington DC or New York might be worth it, but unlikely. They also reference an invitation sent by Tom Barrack. This communication contains sensitive information and should only be shared with authorized parties.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032414.txt

In the document, Sultan Bin Sulayem asks if it is possible to shake hands with Donald Trump during his presidential inauguration. Jeffrey E responds that there will be a large crowd and suggests meeting before or after in either Washington D.C. or New York. Sultan also mentions receiving an invitation from Tom Barrack. The document includes information about the confidentiality of communication and copyright issues.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032281.txt

The report presents data on the presidential election, analyzing tweets about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton from September. Trump's negative impressions were high, especially in Florida, while his positive impression was high in New York. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton received more negative impressions than positive ones, with California being her most popular state for positive impressions. The data shows a significant discrepancy between the two candidates' approval ratings across different states in the US.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026627.txt

The document provides an analysis of the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in three US presidential election debates held on October 19, 2016. It shows that both candidates received positive and negative feedback from social media users, with Trump receiving more negative feedback than Clinton. Additionally, the document provides data on each candidate's chances of winning the election based on state-by-state projections. Overall, the analysis suggests that while both candidates had their strengths and weaknesses, they both faced challenges in winning certain states.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt

The document reports on the insights generated by InsightsPod after the third US Presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. It notes that Trump's popularity has increased following the debate. The report is likely intended for review by Jeffrey, who appears to be associated with a group or organization referred to as HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026626.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026499.txt

The sender of the email discusses potential third-party presidential candidates in response to current political events and asks for thoughts on specific attributes for a candidate. The sender acknowledges that the 2018 elections are shaping up to be a referendum on President Trump and that there is no sign of the Mueller investigation's impact ebbing. The sender raises questions about the effectiveness of traditional two-party politics in addressing the current political climate and suggests the need for a back-up plan in case the system fails again.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026304.txt

The document discusses the political situation in the United States, focusing on the upcoming fall elections and the battle for potential Supreme Court justice Brett Kavanaugh's nomination. The author suggests that unless the underlying political dynamics are disrupted, the outcomes of these events will leave us with the same unsatisfactory two front battlefield as the 2016 Presidential election. The author also raises the question of whether we want to break the current political system and nominating process for selecting candidates in 2020.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014622.txt

The document is a summary of top US ideas for Q1, focusing on strategy and equity. The backdrop for risk assets has changed due to global interest rates reaching 5,000-year lows and the historical US Presidential election and Republican sweep of Congress in November 2016. OPEC reached a historic deal to reduce crude production by 1.2mn b/d with non-OPEC producers delivering an additional 600k b/d of cuts that same month, leading to risk assets responding positively. The current strategy stands in stark contrast to last year's focus on defensive growth ideas and is more heavily geared toward companies benefiting from increased fiscal stimulus, a pro-business agenda, and tax-policy reform. There are eight Buys and two Underperforms across six sectors listed, with updates planned at the beginning of each quarter unless coverage is dropped or recommendations change.