Documents tagged "Presidential Election"
Found 4 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028994.jpg
The image is a circular graph with two different pie charts, each representing data from the U.S. Presidential Election 2016. The top chart shows "Live Feeds" with categories such as Neutral, Positive, and Negative, each represented by a slice of the pie. The bottom chart displays "Weekly Reports" divided into the same three categories: Neutral, Positive, and Negative. Each category's percentage is indicated on its respective slice. The text mentions the names "Donald Trump" and "Hillary Clinton," suggesting these are the candidates being analyzed in the data represented by the charts.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028993.jpg
The image is a digital slide with text related to the US Presidential Election of 2016. The title at the top reads "Live Feeds - US Presidential Election 2016" in bold white letters against a black background. Below the title, there are two bullet points providing information about social media analytics and insights from the election process. However, the content of these bullet points is not entirely visible or legible due to the image's resolution and size. The style of the image is simplistic, with no additional graphics or images aside from the text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt
The document presents an update on the US Presidential Election performance of candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It states that since the start of the second presidential debate, 3.1 million tweets have been processed. The positive, neutral, and negative percentages for each candidate are provided, as well as their winning chances. Additionally, the winning chances in various US states are highlighted for both candidates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026627.txt
The document provides an analysis of the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in three US presidential election debates held on October 19, 2016. It shows that both candidates received positive and negative feedback from social media users, with Trump receiving more negative feedback than Clinton. Additionally, the document provides data on each candidate's chances of winning the election based on state-by-state projections. Overall, the analysis suggests that while both candidates had their strengths and weaknesses, they both faced challenges in winning certain states.