Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Election"

Found 19 documents with this tag

EFTA00032998-p-5.jpg

The image shows a postcard that appears to be used for voting purposes. The postcard is addressed to "J. Epstein" and includes handwritten notes on the front side. There's also a stamp visible in the upper right corner with the words "Election Mail." The text on the postcard, partially obscured by handwriting, mentions "Important Election Reminders" and provides dates of "Nov 3, 2020" and "Dec 8, 2020." Additionally, there's a red stamp indicating that the postcard is to be sent "Return Service Requested." The handwriting includes some initials next to the name "J. Epstein" on the front of the postcard, possibly indicating the sender or recipient's confirmation.

DOJ-OGR-00005828.jpg

The image is a low-resolution photograph of a document with printed text on it. The content appears to be an official paper, possibly from a government or legal proceeding, as suggested by the reference to "Federal Election Commission" and the presence of a case number at the top. There are also headings and subheadings within the text, indicating sections or topics covered in the document. Due to the image quality and angle, it's challenging to read the entire text clearly, but there is mention of an individual named "John Doe" which often serves as a generic name placeholder in legal contexts. The style of the text suggests a formal and structured presentation typical of official documents.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028994.jpg

The image is a circular graph with two different pie charts, each representing data from the U.S. Presidential Election 2016. The top chart shows "Live Feeds" with categories such as Neutral, Positive, and Negative, each represented by a slice of the pie. The bottom chart displays "Weekly Reports" divided into the same three categories: Neutral, Positive, and Negative. Each category's percentage is indicated on its respective slice. The text mentions the names "Donald Trump" and "Hillary Clinton," suggesting these are the candidates being analyzed in the data represented by the charts.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028993.jpg

The image is a digital slide with text related to the US Presidential Election of 2016. The title at the top reads "Live Feeds - US Presidential Election 2016" in bold white letters against a black background. Below the title, there are two bullet points providing information about social media analytics and insights from the election process. However, the content of these bullet points is not entirely visible or legible due to the image's resolution and size. The style of the image is simplistic, with no additional graphics or images aside from the text.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033311.txt

The document contains an email from Richard Kahn on September 14, 2016, discussing election polls and results for various races including the presidential race between Trump and Clinton. The emails includes links to multiple poll sources and notes changes in approval ratings of President Obama. It also mentions a Senate race in Kansas between Moran and Wiesner and a House race in Maine's 1st district between Holbrook and Pingree.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033307.txt

The document is an email from Richard Kahn to Jeffrey E. on July 25, 2016. The main topic of the email is a summary of polls regarding the race between Trump and Clinton for the US presidency, showing that Trump has gained some support after the Republican National Convention (RNC). However, it is important to note that these are just snapshots in time, and polling can be affected by many factors.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033183.txt

The document discusses a market indicator that gives Donald Trump an 86% chance of winning the election, with Jeffrey Epstein being one of the recipients. The sender is Richard Kahn and the subject line mentions "Market Indicator Gives Trump An 86% Chance Of Winning The Election". It also includes a link to an article on Zerohedge that discusses this topic.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt

The document presents an update on the US Presidential Election performance of candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It states that since the start of the second presidential debate, 3.1 million tweets have been processed. The positive, neutral, and negative percentages for each candidate are provided, as well as their winning chances. Additionally, the winning chances in various US states are highlighted for both candidates.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033171.txt

This document is an email exchange between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey E. about US election updates. Zubair has processed tweets related to the presidential debate and found that Clinton's popularity has increased with 62% support, while Trump has huge support in Ohio and New Jersey. Clinton is likely to win in New York, California, and Michigan.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032325.txt

The email exchange discusses the results of an analysis of tweets regarding the 2016 presidential election. Zubair Khan mentions that according to their data, Trump has a higher chance of winning in the Electoral College than Clinton. Jeffrey E. questions if this is considering the popular vote or only the electoral college. They also discuss the possibility of meeting and discussing the business plan for InsightsPod, a company that analyzes social media activity related to political events.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032324.txt

This document summarizes the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the US election based on captured tweets from November 1st. The chances of winning for both candidates are listed, as well as their respective chances of winning in various US states.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032323.txt

In the document, Zubair Khan sends an email to Jeffrey E. about an election update report. The report states that Trump is more popular based on processed tweets. Additionally, the report includes information about HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032323.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032281.txt

The report presents data on the presidential election, analyzing tweets about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton from September. Trump's negative impressions were high, especially in Florida, while his positive impression was high in New York. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton received more negative impressions than positive ones, with California being her most popular state for positive impressions. The data shows a significant discrepancy between the two candidates' approval ratings across different states in the US.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032280.txt

The document is an email from Zubair Khan to Jeffrey E. containing a US Election report. The key topics of the report are not specified in this summary, but it seems that it may contain information related to the oversight committee. It's unclear who else was involved or where the report was sent, as there are no other names or locations mentioned in the summary provided.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032274.txt

The email discusses the General Election between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and mentions Peter Thiel as a speaker. Polls are getting closer, with CBS News/NY Times showing a tie and The Economist/YouGov giving Clinton a two-point lead. The sender is Richard Kahn from HBRK Associates Inc. and the recipient's email address is jeeyacation@gmail.com.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029519.txt

The document discusses a statement made by Noam Chomsky regarding the Democratic focus on Russia as a gift to President Trump. Chomsky believes that this could potentially lead to Trump winning the next election. The author, Richard Kahn, is sharing this information with Jeffrey Epstein and providing a link to an article for further reading.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026627.txt

The document provides an analysis of the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in three US presidential election debates held on October 19, 2016. It shows that both candidates received positive and negative feedback from social media users, with Trump receiving more negative feedback than Clinton. Additionally, the document provides data on each candidate's chances of winning the election based on state-by-state projections. Overall, the analysis suggests that while both candidates had their strengths and weaknesses, they both faced challenges in winning certain states.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026626.txt

The document reports on the insights generated by InsightsPod after the third US Presidential debate between Donald Trump and Joe Biden. It notes that Trump's popularity has increased following the debate. The report is likely intended for review by Jeffrey, who appears to be associated with a group or organization referred to as HOUSE OVERSIGHT 026626.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026625.txt

This is an email from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein, dated October 18, 2016. The email includes a YouTube video titled "Rigging the Election - Video I: Clinton Campaign and DNC Incite Violence at Trump Rallies" and two attachments. The email also contains information about the sender's contact details, including his law firm's address in New York City. Additionally, there is a disclaimer that states that the information contained in the communication is confidential and may be attorney-client privileged.