Documents tagged "Ken Starr"
Found 30 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030887.txt
In the email exchange between Boris Nikolic and Jeffrey Epstein, they discuss meeting up at a later time as Boris just landed in Iga. They agree on a plan to meet the next day at 7:30 pm. It is suggested that they invite Mick Jagger, Ken Starr, Clinton, and Julie Taymor to join them for an event on Monday night.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030886.txt
The document is an email exchange between two individuals, Boris Nikolic and Jeffrey Epstein. The key topics discussed in the emails are related to travel plans, meeting times, and potential guests for a gathering. Names of people mentioned include Mick Jagger, Ken Starr, Clinton, Julie Taymor, and Bill Gates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030806.txt
The email chain discusses a possible meeting between Boris Nikolic and Jeffrey Epstein, with plans to coordinate schedules and possibly invite other people including Mick Jagger, Ken Starr, Clinton, and Julie Taymor. The communication emphasizes the importance of keeping the information confidential, suggesting that it may involve sensitive or privileged information.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030626.txt
This document discusses a motion to unseal appeal briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion was filed by John Browning from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and has received responses from several people including Martin G. Weinberg, Alan Dershowitz, Darren Indyke, Ken Starr, Kathy Ruemmler, and Kimberly Homan. The case involves sensitive information that is subject to attorney-client privilege and confidentiality.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
This document discusses a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and his connection to high-level politicians. The writer suggests that there may be an opportunity to use Epstein's relationship with former President Clinton as a way to attack the Trump administration, specifically Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta who was involved in the case. They argue that the federal government overstepped its bounds by intruding into what should have been a local matter and criticize the current backlash against those who made decisions at the time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
This document is an email conversation between multiple people regarding Jeffrey Epstein and a deal he made with the federal government for a previous case. The participants include Matthew Hiltzik, Michael Wolff, J (possibly Jeffrey Epstein himself), and Ken Starr. The topic of discussion centers around the public's perception of Epstein's connection to high-ranking politicians and how it might affect the narrative surrounding his case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt
The email conversation discusses a possible line in an article that acknowledges Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoing and mentions his connection to the Clintons. It also refers to his association with the Trump administration official who dealt with the case. The discussion highlights Epstein's role as a friend of former President Clinton and points out that he is connected to high levels of federal government, which could lead to anger surrounding the former president. Additionally, it references Ken Starr's critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting that his offense was quintessentially local in nature but treated as a state offense by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030142.txt
The document proposes a study on JASTA's impact on KSA politically and economically, with a focus on Kathryn Ruemmler and Ken Starr. The approach to finding weaknesses is outlined, along with a timeline of actions and leaders involved in the process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029111.txt
In the email exchange between Joi Ito and Jeffrey E., they discuss current events such as the #metoo movement and Madars' PhD paper winning an award for identifying a vulnerability in ING's new crypto currency. They also share their personal experiences, with Joi Ito mentioning a recent pinched nerve in his neck, and Jeffrey E. noting that he has been asked for advice due to the increase in harassment cases. They both express interest in meeting up in Boston.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028533.txt
The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Ken Starr regarding Jed Rubenfeld. The key topic of discussion is the need for procedural fairness in campus adjudicatory proceedings. Jeffrey E. suggests that scholars should not be too scholarly, and that no one should be above the law. He also mentions the idea that Trump could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a vote, but would still suffer consequences. Ken Starr agrees with Jeffrey E.'s assessment of Rubenfeld and his ideas on procedural fairness.