Documents tagged "New Yorker"
Found 80 documents with this tag
EFTA02696177.pdf
The document describes a failed email delivery attempt and includes an excerpt from a conversation about placebo effects and a partnership proposal related to placebo studies. Key figures include Jeffre E. Stein, Jeffrey Epstein, Ted J. Kaptchuk, and individuals associated with Harvard University.
EFTA02696032.pdf
The document discusses a delayed email delivery notification due to recipient server issues, with mentions of Jeffrey Epstein and Shelley in a context related to placebo studies and wellness practices. Technical details indicate an MX IP address issue.
EFTA02695841.pdf
The document is an email notification regarding a delayed delivery of an original message sent to jeevacation@gmail.com. Technical issues prevented the initial delivery, and the message will be retried for one more day. The original message discussed placebo effects in relation to sexual studies and mentions potential partnership opportunities between Harvard University and Jeffrey Epstein's efforts.
EFTA02695678.pdf
The document discusses media attention on the sender's work and a need for additional telephone conversations with Jeffrey about potential partnerships at Harvard Medical School. Key topics include recent New Yorker article coverage, anticipated "60 Minutes" segment, and developing institutional roots.
EFTA02686390.pdf
The document discusses a lunch meeting between Joi Ito and Mike, with Jeffrey Epstein not required to join. It also mentions an overlapping board call with Barnaby that Joi will need to reschedule around. The original message includes Joi's travel and meeting schedule for October 1st-2nd.
EFTA02686366.pdf
Joi Ito sends a schedule to Jeffrey for their meeting, including arrival at Westchester Airport and plans for October 1st and 2nd. Key events include breakfast with Jun Makihara, a Skype call with Jeffrey and Ed, and a Board Call with PureTech.
EFTA02684957.pdf
The document is an email from Nathan Wolfe to Jeffrey Epstein, sharing a New Yorker piece about them titled "World Changers" published on December 13, 2011. No key people other than the sender and recipient are mentioned.
EFTA02680321.pdf
The document is an email from Barbro C Ehnbom to Jeffrey, discussing the BBBXmas event in Stockholm on December 10, 2012. She suggests that Jeffrey meet with them during his visit to New York and offers him a chance to support their cause by visiting the event. The email also mentions other events and people like the Nobel Festivities, Lisa as the Water Ambassador of Sweden, and Mathias Uhlen.
EFTA02638126.pdf
The document discusses the importance of serious communication and face-to-face interaction, with Larry Summers responding to a message about thoughtful and in-person interactions. There is a mention of someone retreating into the locker room instead of addressing issues directly.
EFTA02638103.pdf
The document discusses a disagreement about reproductive anatomy between Jeev and Larry Summers, with follow-up commentary on the seriousness of written communication versus face-to-face interactions. The conversation also touches upon the metaphorical use of time-outs and public responses in professional settings.
EFTA02637676.pdf
The document is an email from Robert Trivers to Jeffrey Epstein discussing a New Yorker article mentioning Epstein, Trivers' recent visit to Hunter College where he was offered low pay, and his upcoming trip to London/Berlin. Trivers also asks for a convenient time to call Epstein.
EFTA02637640.pdf
The document discusses financial issues related to a job offer from Hunter College and mentions Robert Trivers. J, the sender, is unhappy with the salary offered and intends to take short trips in June. There is also mention of an article where J was mentioned by a fact-checker at The New Yorker, which led to a discussion about J's support for someone at Hunter College on sabbatical.
EFTA02637529.pdf
Robert Trivers discusses his longstanding interest in theories of evolutionary biology, specifically focusing on male homosexuality as a counterintuitive trait. He explains how this trait is often found on the maternal side and relates it to the "older brother effect." Trivers then shifts to analyzing honor killings as an even more perplexing phenomenon from an evolutionary perspective. He expresses his intention to write up his thoughts on these topics, emphasizing their importance despite potential criticism.
EFTA02637506.pdf
The document discusses a correspondence between Jeffrey, who offers to discuss research topics such as transgender biology, and Robert Trivers. They also briefly touch on funding issues and past support for Trivers' work. The conversation centers around Trivers’ availability to speak or be contacted.
EFTA02637457.pdf
The document discusses scheduling and a call from an unnamed sender. Larry Summers mentions he is in Boston and suggests calling him back. The conversation touches on personal comments about ovaries, and the idea of being both thoughtful and face-to-face. The exchange seems informal and personal.
EFTA02637081.pdf
The sender, using a personal email account, requests the recipient's lawyer to confirm that they have received a New Yorker story. The document also contains confidentiality warnings and instructions on how to handle the communication if it is received in error.
EFTA02636736.pdf
The document discusses an ongoing disagreement between the sender and recipient regarding exit strategies and rules in a presumably romantic or professional context. Larry Summers is mentioned as having written notes for an exit strategy but plans to delay sending them. The conversation highlights mutual uncertainty and a desire to avoid obsessing over the situation.
EFTA02636429.pdf
The document discusses a disagreement about the appropriate way to communicate regarding an exit strategy, with Larry Summers expressing frustration over written communication versus face-to-face interaction. Key points include the sender's belief that written notes are inappropriate, as they do not convey strength and respect.
EFTA02636395.pdf
The document discusses the importance of both thoughtful and face-to-face communication. The sender supports the idea that written communication can show seriousness but argues against using notes in sensitive situations as it may be seen as a retreat. Larry Summers initially comments on the appropriateness of face-to-face meetings but later questions why a note was used instead.
EFTA02636352.pdf
The document discusses the sender’s interaction with someone in Australia regarding a legal matter involving Erica Dubno, their lawyer. It also mentions an email from Zach Helfand and references a New Yorker story. The main topic is seeking confirmation about a fact checker's name through the recipient’s lawyer.