Documents tagged "Official"
Found 398 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008920-p-22.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with a handwritten list of questions and answers. The paper appears to be an official form, possibly from a legal or medical context given the formal structure and topics discussed. There are visible names at the top, one being "Ms. Monica Lewinsky" and another that has been redacted. The text is organized into numbered items, with questions such as "What did she say when you asked her about ...?" followed by answers related to those questions. The topics discussed seem to be confidential in nature, possibly concerning a case or investigation involving Ms. Lewinsky.
EFTA00008920-p-21.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be an official document or transcription from a legal or medical context, judging by the presence of numbers and a title at the top that resembles a question number "23". The visible text includes phrases like "How did they get in contact?", suggesting a line of questioning or statements related to some investigation or interview. There are also handwritten notes on the document, indicating editing or annotations, with words such as "paid for" and "character" circled with lines through them, possibly to strike out these points. The paper is set against a plain background that does not provide any additional context or distraction from the text.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-16.jpg
The image is a scanned document with multiple pages that seem to be questionnaires or interview questions related to aviation, specifically regarding an incident at the Dulles International Airport in Virginia. Each page contains a series of numbered questions, such as "Question: What is your name?" and "Question: When did you first learn about the incident at Dulles International Airport on 9/11?" Some pages are partially obscured or rotated, making it difficult to read all the text in full. There is visible handwriting that appears to be annotations or corrections, with some lines marked through by a pen. The style of the document suggests an official investigation or fact-finding process conducted after an event at the mentioned airport.
EFTA00008920-p-10.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with a table containing questions and answers related to a legal proceeding or investigation. The document appears to be a transcript of testimony given by a person named "Randall A. Cunningham" to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on September 15, 2004. The handwriting is visible, suggesting that the responses were written out during the interview. There are lines drawn through certain text, indicating that it has been redacted or removed for confidentiality purposes.
EFTA00008920-p-04.jpg
The image is a scanned document with visible text that appears to be from a court proceeding. The page includes several lines of writing, which are partially redacted with black marks covering certain areas, presumably to protect sensitive information. There's a header at the top with "COURT REPORTER" printed in bold, and below it, there is an address or location line that reads "150 EAST 42ND STREET." The visible text includes phrases such as "We investigate crimes," indicating that the court is dealing with law enforcement matters. The quality of the image suggests it's a photocopy or digital scan of an official document, and the text is printed in black ink on a white background.
EFTA00008920-p-02.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text and handwritten annotations. The paper appears to be an official document related to criminal justice, possibly a police report or court documentation. Due to the resolution and angle, it is challenging to read all the details, but some visible words include "INVESTIGATION REPORT" at the top and a section titled "SUBJECT'S STATEMENT." There are also handwritten marks such as lines through text, highlighting certain parts with circles, and annotations in the margins. The document is signed by an individual whose name is not legible in this image.
EFTA00008892-p-24.jpg
The image is a photograph of what appears to be an official document or questionaire with the title "List all the people under the age of" crossed out, indicating that part of the question has been redacted. The document is on white paper and there are visible lines suggesting it was printed from a typewriter or a digital printer imitating a typewriter font. The photograph captures only part of the document, focusing on the top right corner where the title and instructions can be seen. There is no clear indication of people or locations in this portion of the image.
EFTA00008892-p-23.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text, which appears to be a question and answer format. The visible portion of the text includes a question that begins "Q: Did Geoffrey Ptak have a scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual purposes?" followed by an answer that is partially obscured. Only the first few words of the answer are clear: "Mr. Radiclava, I don't know what you are talking about." The style of the image looks like it may have been taken with a camera or a smartphone, capturing the printed document in an unprofessional manner. There is no visible person or location depicted on the paper itself. The text suggests that this might be related to some sort of official or legal proceeding, as indicated by the formal language and context of the question posed.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.
EFTA00008892-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with text. It appears to be an official notice regarding a court case, specifically mentioning "UNITED STATES v. GISELE MERRITT" as the title. Below this title is additional information including "GRAND JURY PROCEEDING" and a date in June 2016. There's also text indicating that the document was received or signed on May 9, 2016. The document has a red stamp at the top left corner which seems to indicate it as "Copies for Distribution" with a handwritten note underneath "FOR THE COURT" and a number "75" in parentheses. The style of the image suggests it is a photograph or scan of an actual piece of paper, possibly from a legal proceeding or court system.
EFTA00008874-p-13.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text on it. The text is too small to read clearly from this description, but the layout includes paragraphs and lines of text that seem to be part of a formal or official report or statement. There are no visible people, locations, or significant objects besides the written content. Please provide information about the context or additional details if you need more specific descriptions.
EFTA00008874-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. At the top of the document is a line that reads "THIS DOCUMENT IS NOT FOR RELEASE AT THIS TIME WITHOUT APPROVAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SECRETARY." The document appears to be related to legal proceedings or matters, as suggested by phrases such as "motion for rehearing," "petitioner's brief," and "respondent's brief." Handwritten annotations include words like "redo," "add," "delete," and "edit," indicating editorial instructions. The text is a mix of black ink and typewriter font, which suggests the document might be from an earlier time when typewriters were commonly used for official correspondence or legal documents.
EFTA00008874-p-10.jpg
The image is a black and white document with printed text. It contains the title "EXHIBIT A" at the top, suggesting it's part of a larger legal or official proceeding. Below this, there are paragraphs numbered 1 through 4, each detailing different aspects of what appears to be a travel itinerary or schedule for someone named John Doe. The text includes dates and locations such as "August 2019 in Los Angeles" and "September 2019 in New York." There's also mention of a meeting with the CEO, which is part of Paragraph 3. The document has been photographed from an angle, creating a slight curve on the left side, indicating it was not laid out flat when captured. The text is dense and appears to be of formal nature, possibly related to legal proceedings or business matters. There are no visible images or graphics other than the printed text itself.
EFTA00008874-p-09.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The printed content is too small to read clearly, but it appears to be an official document, possibly related to legal proceedings or court proceedings based on the visible headings and the context suggested by the annotations. The handwriting includes corrections and highlights made in pen, emphasizing certain words or phrases within the text. The document's background is a standard white paper with no additional graphics or images.
EFTA00008874-p-08.jpg
The image displays a page with typed text on it. The text appears to be a document or report, possibly related to an investigation or case study. Due to the quality and size of the image, it's difficult to read all the details of the text. However, some words that can be discerned include "group", "similar messages", "information", "received", "interviewed", and several phrases suggesting a narrative or findings related to an incident. There are no visible people or locations in the image, as it focuses solely on the text. The document seems to be formal, with consistent margins and a structured layout typical of official reports or legal documents. The style of the image is straightforward and documentary, capturing the content without any aesthetic embellishments.
EFTA00008874-p-04.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of printed text on paper, with the focus blurry and slightly out of alignment, making it difficult to read all the words clearly. However, from what can be discerned, it seems like an official document or report containing information that is too small to be described accurately. The text might include headings, subheadings, paragraphs, and possibly some figures or tables. There are no visible images of people, locations, or significant objects aside from the printed text itself.
EFTA00008874-p-01.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document from the United States District Court Southern District of New York. The document appears to be a legal filing or motion related to a case with several paragraphs of text detailing points and arguments for the court's consideration. It is dated, though the exact date is not fully visible in the image provided. At the top left corner, there is a stamp indicating that it has been filed or accepted by the court. The document's text and content are central to its purpose, but specific details such as names, case numbers, and legal jargon would typically be redacted for privacy and security reasons.
EFTA00008744-p-119.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "CERTIFICATE" at the top. It appears to be a legal or official form with several lines of text that seem to be filled out by hand. There is visible writing on the form, including the name "Shelby Czajka" near the top and a date "21 APR 03" towards the bottom. The document also includes some checkboxes with what appears to be a statement about processing or delivery of information being true to the best of the person's knowledge. The rest of the content is obscured, likely due to redaction, as indicated by blacked-out sections that prevent further details from being read.