Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Record"

Found 183 documents with this tag

EFTA00008744-p-064.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a document, specifically an interview record or transcript of a conversation between a police officer and a witness. The conversation seems to be related to a case involving a woman named "Susan." There are several questions and answers listed under the headings "Q:" for questions and "A:" for answers, indicating the exchange between the two individuals. Due to the angle and quality of the image, it's difficult to read all the text clearly. The document is on paper with visible lines and a header or footer that includes some sort of identification number. The style of the image suggests it was taken casually, possibly from an angle that obscures part of the document.

EFTA00008744-p-063.jpg

The image displays a document with various sections of text and numbers arranged in columns. The top portion of the text is redacted or obscured by black marks, making it unreadable. Below this, there are lines numbered from 26 to 35, each followed by a question mark. The questions are not clearly visible due to the quality of the image and the redaction. The visible part of the text includes phrases such as "did you talk with" and "you told me that..." which suggest an interview or questioning context. There is also visible text mentioning dates like "10/31/2017," indicating a specific day in October 2017. The document has a formal appearance, resembling an official report, transcript of testimony, or a question and answer list from an investigation. The presence of the date suggests that this might be related to legal proceedings or records.

EFTA00008744-p-062.jpg

The image shows a handwritten note on paper with lines and numbers at the top, suggesting it could be part of an official document or interview transcript. The writing is in black ink, and there are some words crossed out with red pen, indicating corrections or emphasis on particular phrases. The person's name mentioned in the note appears to be "Commander Kevin Ralston"; however, the text is partially obscured by redaction marks that replace parts of the text with asterisks. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, consistent with official records or legal documents.

EFTA00008744-p-056.jpg

The image appears to be a scanned document with black and white text that is slightly blurred and rotated approximately 90 degrees to the left. It seems to be an official paper, possibly related to court proceedings or legal matters, as indicated by the header "REPORTER'S RECORD" at the top left corner. The visible portion of the text includes phrases like "THE COURT: Are you representing yourself?" and a response that suggests someone is acting as their own attorney in court. Due to the resolution and orientation, further details are difficult to discern.

EFTA00008744-p-050.jpg

The image appears to be a photocopy of a document with some redacted sections, which are indicated by black lines through the text. It contains handwritten notes and text on what seems to be lined paper, possibly from an interview or an investigation given the nature of the questions and answers. The visible portions of the text include phrases like "Did you ask her?", "Yes, she did," and "She stayed with a friend at their apartment," suggesting inquiries about actions taken by an individual referred to as 'she'. There are references to locations such as a motel room, but specific details have been redacted for privacy or security purposes. The document is likely used for official records or legal proceedings due to its layout and the nature of the information it contains.

EFTA00008744-p-046.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes. The content appears to be related to legal proceedings, as suggested by the phrases "judge", "counsel", and "court record". However, most of the text has been redacted or obscured in black ink, making it difficult to discern the full details. A date stamp on the document indicates that it was received on October 19th, 2015. The visible part of one question reads: "Q: Did you have occasion to be at a particular address".

EFTA00008744-p-038.jpg

The image shows a document with handwritten notes and text on it, which appears to be a transcript of an interview or a report of some sort. The text is too small to read clearly, but it includes questions and answers, as indicated by the layout where a question is followed by an answer. There are also sections with headings such as "PERSON'S NAME" and "QUESTION #" which suggests that this document is structured to record information systematically. At the bottom of the page, there seems to be a signature or initials next to a date, indicating approval or certification of some sort. The document has a formal layout and is likely related to an official inquiry or investigation.

EFTA00008744-p-028.jpg

The image shows a handwritten document with a series of numbered questions and answers, which appear to be related to an interview or survey of some sort. The text is written in black ink on lined paper, with the questions listed vertically on the left side and corresponding answers written next to each question. There are also sections with redacted information, where words have been obscured with black lines, indicating confidentiality or privacy concerns. At the bottom of the page, there's a redacted line that seems to contain contact information or credentials related to the document's author or distributor. The style of the image is candid and utilitarian, typical of an official record or transcription from a conversation or interview.

EFTA00008744-p-022.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten text and numbered lines. It appears to be a list with the title "Q & A" written at the top, indicating questions and answers are recorded here. The visible part of the first question reads, "What did you feel when you heard that she was pregnant?" The text is on lined paper, suggesting it might have been created by hand or typed onto a sheet meant for writing notes. The style of the document suggests an informal or personal context rather than a formal report or official document.

EFTA00008744-p-019.jpg

The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be a transcript or record of an interview with a person named "Norris" conducted by someone whose name is redacted (blacked out). The text on the document includes questions and answers related to personal information, such as Norris's age, location at specific dates, and other biographical details. The handwriting suggests that it might be from an older or informal source. The bottom of the document has a signature of the interviewer and their title, which is also redacted.

EFTA00008744-p-012.jpg

The image displays a page with handwritten notes that appear to be taken during an interview or conversation. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its sloppiness and the low resolution of the image. There are lines crossed out, which could indicate corrections or redactions in the text. The page includes numbered sections, suggesting it's part of a structured record-taking process. It seems to be a personal note rather than an official document, as there are no visible logos or stamps that would identify a specific institution or organization.

EFTA00008744-p-009.jpg

The image displays a document with text on it, resembling a legal or official paper with question and answer segments. The content includes phrases such as "Q. Will you describe for the jury" and "A. I will now," suggesting that this is likely from a transcript of testimony in a court case or legal proceeding. Some words are redacted with black marks to obscure sensitive information. There's also a date visible at the bottom right corner of the page, but it's not clear enough to read accurately. The style of the document suggests it may be a printed copy from a hearing or trial record.

EFTA00008744-p-008.jpg

The image displays a legal document with handwritten annotations and corrections. The document appears to be an official court transcript, as indicated by the context and content of the writing. There are several lines of text, some crossed out with red pen, which suggests editing or clarification of certain points. At the bottom, there is a red stamp indicating "Received" along with a date in 2021. The style of the image is formal and legalistic, typical of court records.

EFTA00008744-p-002.jpg

The image appears to be a digital scan of a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The text is partially obscured by the black marks of an ink pen, suggesting that some information has been redacted for privacy or confidentiality reasons. There are visible segments of handwriting that seem to correspond to responses to questions, indicating that this could be part of an interview transcript or survey results. One section includes a series of numbers followed by letters, and below them are what appear to be words like "interview" and "questionnaire" in quotation marks, which may refer to the structure of the document or the context in which it was used. The visible handwritten text is not entirely clear due to the redaction, but there's mention of a hospital setting. The bottom right corner contains some additional information that seems incomplete: "Name of Hospital," followed by black marks covering part of the name. There are also phone numbers present, indicating contact details for the facility or individuals involved in the matter at hand. The overall style of the document suggests it is a formal record, possibly from a medical or legal context due to the redaction and nature of the content.

EFTA00008716-p-22.jpg

The image shows a computer screen with a web browser open displaying what appears to be a legal document or court order dated April 2, 2016. The document includes text and a line of redacted information, possibly to protect sensitive data such as names or addresses. At the bottom right corner of the screen, there is a mouse cursor visible, indicating that someone might be interacting with the document or browsing other content on the site. The image itself has a watermark diagonally across it, suggesting it's from a public record repository or similar service meant to obscure personal information for privacy reasons.

EFTA00008716-p-15.jpg

The image displays a document with a table of data and some text annotations. At the top right corner, there is a red arrow pointing to the date "May 9, 1997" which suggests that this is a significant part of the information in the document. The document appears to be related to flight details or records from that specific date, as indicated by the context provided. There are also some sections with blacked out text, possibly for privacy reasons or to comply with regulations about confidential data.

EFTA00008708-p-6.jpg

The image is a scanned document with text. The document appears to be an official paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or court records, as indicated by the presence of sections titled "MOTION" and "ORDER." There are several lines of text under these headings, but the specific content is not described in detail as it would require transcription. The document's background is white, and there are no visible images or illustrations within its borders. The font used for the text varies in size, with some sections appearing larger than others. There are horizontal lines separating different parts of the text, suggesting a structured format commonly found in legal documents. The image resolution is low, making it difficult to read the finer details of the text. However, there are no visible people or locations within this document as it primarily contains written information. The overall style and layout suggest formality and an official context.

EFTA00008631-p-76.jpg

The image appears to be a scan of a piece of paper with text and lines. The text at the top reads "ELECTRONIC REQUEST" followed by some illegible characters that could potentially be names or codes. Below this header is a series of rows, each containing lines where information might typically be written. At the bottom right corner of the image, there's a date "2015/08/26," suggesting when this document was printed or generated. The paper looks like it could be used for recording data or keeping track of certain tasks or requests.

EFTA00008631-p-75.jpg

The image is a photograph of what appears to be a court transcript or a similar official document from a legal proceeding. The text within the document includes sections labeled "Q" (for question) and "A" (for answer), with various exchanges between individuals who are identified as "Judge," "Defendant," "Prosecutor," and "Witness." This suggests that the document records a trial or similar legal event where witnesses were questioned by both prosecution and defense. Some of the names have been redacted for privacy purposes. The specific content of the questions and answers is not clearly visible due to the resolution and angle of the photograph.

EFTA00008631-p-71.jpg

The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document or transcript with handwritten annotations on it. The majority of the content is obscured by black marks that prevent legibility. However, there are sections where the text is visible, including phrases such as "Q. Do you remember if he talked about the next date of his cover page?" and "A. No." This suggests that the document may be a record of an interview or legal proceeding with questions (Q) and answers (A) being recorded. The overall appearance is that of a piece of evidence related to an investigation, possibly due to its context and markings.

PreviousPage 3 of 10Next