Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Redacted"

Found 176 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032496.txt

The document is a private email exchange between Darren Indyke and Jeffrey Epstein, with legal and confidential information about financial matters being discussed. The communication emphasizes the attorney-client privilege and confidentiality of the contents within the message. It also mentions the location of the sender, which is New York City.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032491.txt

In an email from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein, Indyke mentions a conversation he had with Etienne Binant regarding the mode of payment for a transaction. Binant suggests using wires and having an online code for payments. Indyke responds that checks are more cumbersome but can be used if necessary. The email emphasizes the importance of confidentiality and attorney-client privilege in their communication.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032486.txt

In this email exchange, Darren Indyke and Etienne Binant discuss financial matters such as using wire transfers instead of checks for payments, organizing everything online through an internet code, and possibly implementing a "checks and balances" control with a cap on wiring powers. They also discuss the need for someone to keep track of receipts and inventory before shipping proofs to each other.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032467.txt

The document is about various people discussing financial matters, particularly the process of activating accounts and accessing internet banking. The key individuals mentioned in the conversation are Darren Indyke, Jeffrey E., Etienne Binant, Lang Caroline, and Arianna Cali. The context of the discussion involves making sure that necessary steps have been taken to start the ball rolling on financial matters, such as providing access to internet banking and keeping track of progress with artists' work.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032464.txt

The document is a series of email exchanges between several individuals regarding an update on an account/wire and internet banking access. Key people mentioned include Darren Indyke, Jeffrey Epstein, Etienne Binant, and Caroline Lang. The discussions touch upon topics such as art fairs or shows, artists' studios and homes, supporting great artists, galleries, the importance of being at the source for talented individuals, and making a difference in their ecosystem.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032358.txt

The document is an email exchange between two individuals, Miller and Jeffrey E., discussing confidential information that may be privileged or contain inside information. The content of the emails is not disclosed due to confidentiality and legal privilege. Both parties emphasize the importance of protecting the information contained in their communications.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032339.txt

The email contains information about an article in the Daily Mail which discusses a woman who made allegations of sexual assault against both Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein when she was 13 years old. The sender expresses skepticism about the veracity of these claims, suggesting that the story might be fabricated. The recipient of the email is advised to handle this information with care due to its sensitive nature.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt

This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032331.txt

The document contains an email exchange between two individuals, with one individual asking the other for assistance on a matter related to Jeffrey Epstein. The recipient of the email is a lawyer at a law firm in New York City. The sender of the original message is Michael Miller from House Oversight and the topic of the discussion is not specified in this summary. The email contains a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case involving Donald Trump and others, but it's unclear how this relates to Jeffrey Epstein or the assistance being requested.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt

The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt

The document discusses an inquiry from the WSJ regarding a case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. The conversation includes several individuals, including Michael Miller from Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Jeffrey E., and Darren Indyke. They are all discussing deadlines and the need for comments on behalf of Epstein. It appears to be a sensitive legal matter, as indicated by the frequent use of phrases like "privileged" and "confidential information."

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032304.txt

This document is a forwarded email chain regarding an inquiry from The Wall Street Journal about a case involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, has been CC'd on the emails as he is likely to be involved in responding to the WSJ's inquiries. Joseph Palazzolo, a staff reporter from The Wall Street Journal, is asking for a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein and expects to have the story online within a couple of hours.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032250.txt

This document appears to be an email chain discussing the attorney-client privilege, with several key figures mentioned including Martin G. Weinberg, Kathy Ruemmler, and Darren Indyke. The topic of a book by Patterson is also discussed in relation to the need for an immediate counter narrative and potential strategies such as going public and using social media efforts.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032246.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails discussing the publication of a book by Patterson in August. The main concern is about competing book or documentary projects before that time frame. Trump is suggested as an opportunity for an immediate counter narrative, which would involve becoming an anti-Trump voice and going public with a message. A strategic plan involving the individual's public identity, philanthropic activities, media allies, and social media efforts is also recommended.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032233.txt

The document is an email exchange between a reporter from ABC News investigative unit, Martin G. Weinberg, and Jeffrey Epstein's team member Kathy Ruemmler regarding the former President Clinton's connection to the Jeffrey Epstein case. The reporter expresses interest in understanding the case better and requests a meeting with Kathy Ruemmler to discuss the subject off-the-record.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032066.txt

The document discusses a lawsuit filed by Katie Johnson against Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump in federal court in California alleging that they raped her in 1994. The lawsuit was forwarded to Jeff Epstein with the question of whether he would like to speak or offer a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein. It is mentioned that Reuters wants to make sure the story is fair before publishing and are looking for comments from Mr. Epstein.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032063.txt

The document is a series of emails discussing a news article about a federal judge ordering a hearing in a lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump raped a woman when she was 13 years old. The recipients include Michael Miller, Jeffrey E. (jeevacation@gmail.com), and Reid Weingarten, among others. One recipient, Darren Indyke, is mentioned as the sender of one email in the chain, although his role or involvement is not clear from the text provided. The email chain also includes a disclaimer stating that the information is confidential and may be attorney-client privileged, indicating legal significance to the content being discussed.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032062.txt

The document discusses a hearing in Donald Trump's rape lawsuit case, with attorney Martin G. Weinberg mentioning revisions to the opposition by DKI and providing two attachments: "Privileged - Redacted" and "HOUSE OVERSIGHT 032062". The message is marked as "attorney-client privileged" and it's intended only for the use of the addressee, and it contains confidential information.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031983.txt

The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey Epstein and Jay Lefkowitz, discussing a series of questions about Epstein's life and activities. The questions focus on topics such as his involvement with the Jeffrey Epstein Science Foundation, his business clients, time spent in prison, social life changes, relationships with individuals like Ghislaine Maxwell, reactions to his conviction, thoughts on his sentence, charity initiatives, and personal side of the story. The document mentions that much of the press coverage surrounding Mr. Epstein has been inaccurate and defamatory.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031980.txt

This email exchange involves journalist Alexandra Wolfe asking for an interview with Jeffrey Epstein to discuss his science foundation and the impact of his conviction on his business and social life. The emails were forwarded by Jay Lefkowitz, who was cc'd in one of them.

PreviousPage 6 of 9Next