Documents tagged "court"
Found 352 documents with this tag
EFTA00008920-p-26.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with multiple paragraphs of text. The text appears to be a transcript or a report related to an interview or testimony given by a person named "Herman Brown" at the "U.S. Court House" on "1/5/78" at 9:40 AM. Several parts of the text are redacted with black lines, obscuring information that is not meant to be visible. The overall style of the image suggests it is a formal document from a legal or official proceeding.
EFTA00008920-p-25.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text. The handwriting is somewhat difficult to decipher due to its slanted and somewhat hurried appearance. The document includes a section number at the top ("1052"), followed by several lines of text that are mostly obscured or partially erased. Some visible words suggest a discussion about legal issues or testimony in court, possibly related to an investigation involving a named individual who appears to be mentioned multiple times throughout the document. There is also a question posed at the bottom with two parts: "Did you ever see him on this date?" followed by another line that is not fully visible. The word "date" is repeated in both instances, suggesting context related to dates of events or encounters referenced in the notes. The document has an official appearance, likely pertaining to legal proceedings or investigative matters, as indicated by the use of terms like "investigation" and "testimony." The image itself is of a physical paper with visible creases and shadows that suggest it may have been handled or viewed closely by various individuals before being photographed.
EFTA00008920-p-24.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten content. It appears to be a page from a legal case summary or notes taken during an interview or court proceeding. The page contains multiple numbered points with handwritten text that seems to be related to witness statements or questions asked. Some of the text includes phrases like "wasn't there", "in my car", "had no idea", and "never heard back". There are several lines struck out using a heavy pencil mark, indicating deletions or corrections made during this note-taking process. The document has a formal look, with header sections at the top that include dates and other information possibly related to the case's context.
EFTA00008920-p-20.jpg
The image displays a document with typed content, which appears to be an interview transcript. The document has redacted information with black lines covering parts of the text. At the top, there is a heading that seems to be related to legal proceedings, possibly a court case or a formal investigation. The text includes questions and answers, but specific details are obscured by the redaction marks. Below the redacted content, there's a signature followed by initials, which indicates the document was likely signed by an individual, potentially the interviewer or a party involved in the legal process.
EFTA00008920-p-18.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court record or transcript, likely pertaining to legal proceedings involving a person named "Sammy." The document lists numbered questions with handwritten answers in black ink on what seems to be lined paper. The visible text includes the names of parties and participants such as a judge (Judge Kopelman), Sammy, and another individual mentioned as a witness or party involved. The specific details about the case are not disclosed due to redaction; however, it is clear that this is an official legal document from a court proceeding. The document also contains information such as dates ("4/6/98"), possibly indicating the date of the hearing or the date of the transcription. The quality of the image is poor with a grainy texture and faded colors, which makes some parts of the text difficult to read accurately. The overall style of the document suggests it may be from an earlier era of court records when typewritten transcripts were common.
EFTA00008920-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers typed out on lined paper. The top part is partially obscured, but one can see that it contains a date and the word "question" followed by the number "1." Below this, there are two visible questions: "What was your profession?" and "Where were you born?" The corresponding answers seem to be blanked out with red lines or stamps, making them unreadable. There is a name at the bottom of the document that appears to read "JOHN DOE" in capital letters. This is typically a placeholder for an individual's actual name when discussing legal matters or anonymity. The image also includes what seems to be a logo or emblem to the right, but it is not clear enough to discern any specific details. Overall, the document appears to be part of an interview or investigation, possibly related to law enforcement or court proceedings, given the style and content visible in the image.
EFTA00008920-p-04.jpg
The image is a scanned document with visible text that appears to be from a court proceeding. The page includes several lines of writing, which are partially redacted with black marks covering certain areas, presumably to protect sensitive information. There's a header at the top with "COURT REPORTER" printed in bold, and below it, there is an address or location line that reads "150 EAST 42ND STREET." The visible text includes phrases such as "We investigate crimes," indicating that the court is dealing with law enforcement matters. The quality of the image suggests it's a photocopy or digital scan of an official document, and the text is printed in black ink on a white background.
EFTA00008920-p-02.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed text and handwritten annotations. The paper appears to be an official document related to criminal justice, possibly a police report or court documentation. Due to the resolution and angle, it is challenging to read all the details, but some visible words include "INVESTIGATION REPORT" at the top and a section titled "SUBJECT'S STATEMENT." There are also handwritten marks such as lines through text, highlighting certain parts with circles, and annotations in the margins. The document is signed by an individual whose name is not legible in this image.
EFTA00008920-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with various texts and markings that are partially obscured due to blackouts. The title of the document is "Civil Action No." followed by a number, indicating it's from a legal proceeding in a court. There are also headings such as "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT" and "SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK." The name "Brian Stelter" appears on the document, but it is blacked out, suggesting that this could be part of sensitive or private information. The bottom right corner features a stamp or mark indicating "CONFIDENTIAL" or "CONFIDENTIALITY." The overall style of the image suggests it may be related to legal proceedings, possibly involving a person whose name is redacted due to confidentiality. The document appears to have been used or handled, as indicated by creases and marks.
EFTA00008892-p-22.jpg
The image appears to be a digital capture of an official document, possibly from a legal proceeding given the context. The main focus is on a section that includes handwritten annotations in red ink. These annotations are primarily corrections and notes, likely made by someone reviewing the document. The text is partially visible and seems to include phrases such as "Deposition Date" and "Redacted for Privacy." There's also a reference to "Court Order No. 15-CV-2467" indicating that this document might be related to case number 15-CV-2467 in court proceedings. The style of the image suggests it has been scanned or photographed and shared through an electronic medium, given the slight blurriness and shadows around the edges, which are common with digital captures rather than printed documents.
EFTA00008892-p-01.jpg
The image shows a document with text. It appears to be an official notice regarding a court case, specifically mentioning "UNITED STATES v. GISELE MERRITT" as the title. Below this title is additional information including "GRAND JURY PROCEEDING" and a date in June 2016. There's also text indicating that the document was received or signed on May 9, 2016. The document has a red stamp at the top left corner which seems to indicate it as "Copies for Distribution" with a handwritten note underneath "FOR THE COURT" and a number "75" in parentheses. The style of the image suggests it is a photograph or scan of an actual piece of paper, possibly from a legal proceeding or court system.
EFTA00008874-p-18.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a header that reads "U.S. District Court Southern District of New York." Below the court name is the title of the case and docket number. The text includes references to laws such as Title 18, United States Code, Sections 207, 208, and 594. The document seems to be part of a legal proceeding or ruling, possibly related to federal law in the Southern District of New York. The image is clear enough to read some of the text, but it's not possible to discern all details without higher resolution.
EFTA00008874-p-16.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed content that appears to be a legal document or court transcript. It contains typed text on both sides, including questions and answers, which might relate to an ongoing trial or deposition. The text is too small to read in detail, but it suggests the nature of the document is formal and possibly related to a legal proceeding. There are no images, people, or specific locations identifiable from this view of the document.
EFTA00008874-p-14.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be related to legal proceedings or an investigation, given the reference to "New York State Court" and other specific case details such as names and dates. The text in the document discusses points regarding testimony and the provision of evidence. However, for privacy and security reasons, I am not able to read or interpret specific information from the text within images.
EFTA00008874-p-09.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text and handwritten annotations. The printed content is too small to read clearly, but it appears to be an official document, possibly related to legal proceedings or court proceedings based on the visible headings and the context suggested by the annotations. The handwriting includes corrections and highlights made in pen, emphasizing certain words or phrases within the text. The document's background is a standard white paper with no additional graphics or images.
EFTA00008874-p-05.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with text and an accompanying photograph. The document appears to be printed on paper with multiple sections, the first one mentioning "THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK". Below this header, there are several paragraphs, likely related to legal proceedings or court decisions, which are too small to read clearly. On the right side of the document is a photograph depicting an urban scene with trees and buildings that could be part of a cityscape, possibly suggesting a location in New York given the context mentioned on the document. The image quality of both the text and the photograph within the document is low, making it difficult to discern specific details. The style of the image suggests it may have been taken from a physical file or book with important information, possibly legal documentation, and serves as evidence or reference material in a professional or academic setting.
EFTA00008874-p-01.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document from the United States District Court Southern District of New York. The document appears to be a legal filing or motion related to a case with several paragraphs of text detailing points and arguments for the court's consideration. It is dated, though the exact date is not fully visible in the image provided. At the top left corner, there is a stamp indicating that it has been filed or accepted by the court. The document's text and content are central to its purpose, but specific details such as names, case numbers, and legal jargon would typically be redacted for privacy and security reasons.
EFTA00008744-p-111.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with handwritten notes on it, taken from an angle where the text and annotations are clearly visible. The content of the document appears to be related to legal proceedings, as indicated by terms such as "counsel," "judge," and "witness." There are multiple lines crossed out in red ink, suggesting revisions or deletions made during preparation for court. The specific details within the text are obscured due to redaction marks, which prevent certain portions from being read clearly.
EFTA00008744-p-104.jpg
The image is a scanned document, possibly an official paper such as a court transcript or a report with questions and answers listed in black ink. The quality of the scan is not perfect, which makes some text harder to read. The visible parts of the text include phrases like "My dad was shot" and "And did he know what happened?" suggesting that the document pertains to an investigation or legal proceeding involving a family member's involvement in a violent incident. There are also question numbers such as "123456789" and answer indicators like "Yes," but the full context is obscured by the poor quality of the scan. The text on the document provides some insight into the subject matter, but the details are not entirely clear due to the image's resolution.
EFTA00008744-p-097.jpg
The image shows a document with a series of questions and answers that appear to be from an interview. The questions are listed on the left side of the page under numbers such as "1," "2," etc., while the corresponding answers are on the right. Specific text in the image is not detailed due to the limitations of my capabilities. However, the document has been redacted with black marks, obscuring certain sections of text and possibly personal or sensitive information. The style of the document suggests it might be a transcript from an interview or court proceeding.