Documents tagged "handwritten"
Found 743 documents with this tag
EFTA00008744-p-093.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The text is redacted, with black lines covering some portions, presumably to conceal sensitive information. The redactions are scattered across the page, obscuring specific details that might be otherwise visible. The visible parts suggest this could be an interview transcript or a report summarizing conversations, as evidenced by phrases like "Q: Did you speak with Smith?" and "A: Yes." However, the identities of individuals mentioned in the notes are hidden due to the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-090.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten text on it. It appears to be a legal transcription or notes from an investigation or court proceeding, as indicated by the context of the questions and answers. The document has several lines redacted with black marker strokes, concealing parts of the text. The visible portions include references to a person's statement about events, actions, and items associated with their case. The redaction suggests that some information is sensitive or confidential and is being kept from view.
EFTA00008744-p-089.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes that appear to be from an interview or meeting. The content is partially redacted with black lines, obscuring certain parts of the writing. The visible text includes phrases like "She then started screaming" and "she didn't know if he would shoot her." At the bottom, there's a phone number: (903) 874-5126, which seems to be associated with "Sheriff Smith." The style of the document is informal, resembling notes taken in real time during a conversation or an interview session.
EFTA00008744-p-086.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned copy of an official document, possibly from a court or government office. The document contains a table with columns titled "Case Number", "Date Filed", and other information that is typically associated with legal proceedings. There are multiple rows within the table, each representing a case or matter with details such as the type of action (e.g., "Civil Petition"), nature of suit (e.g., "Trespass"), and the names of parties involved in the litigation. The document is marked with stamps, indicating it has been processed or reviewed by a court clerk. Additionally, there are handwritten marks over some information, which could suggest corrections or annotations made by an individual handling the document.
EFTA00008744-p-085.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with multiple questions and answers listed on it. The questions seem to pertain to an event or situation where individuals are being interviewed or questioned. Due to the low resolution of the image and the quality of the scan, some words are difficult to read, but the text includes phrases like "Answer: No" and "Answer: Yes." There's a visible date at the top right corner that says "09/14/2018." The document has been redacted with black lines across various parts of it, obscuring some information. Additionally, there is a handwritten note in black ink on the bottom left that reads, "Q: How many times was he seen at her house? A: 5." The overall style of the image suggests an official or legal context for these questions and answers.
EFTA00008744-p-083.jpg
The image is a scanned document with handwritten notes and typed answers on it. The paper appears to be related to an investigation or interview process as indicated by the question "What was your interaction with Ms. Martin?" and other questions about specific individuals, interactions, or events, such as "Ms. Martin had some connection to massage" and "They were not wearing shirts," along with several other lines of inquiry that are too small to read in detail. The document is titled "Exhibit 1" at the top left corner. There is no visible text about people's locations or any significant objects aside from what appears to be a question-and-answer format.
EFTA00008744-p-082.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with printed questions and answers related to an investigation or legal inquiry. The top half of the page contains question numbers and corresponding blanks for responses, but the actual responses are not visible as they are obscured by redacted sections. At the bottom of the image, there is a partial question number "28" and the beginning of what appears to be a question followed by a handwritten note or response that reads, "Yes." The document has a formal layout typically used in official transcripts, reports, or legal records.
EFTA00008744-p-081.jpg
The image is a scanned document that appears to be a transcript of an interview or testimony, possibly from a court proceeding. The page has numbered lines with handwritten responses on it, and the content of the questions and answers is redacted (blacked out) for privacy or confidentiality reasons. This indicates the text contains sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. There are no visible texts, people, locations, or significant objects in this description due to the redaction of the information. The image itself is a photograph of a physical document rather than an artistic composition or a digitally created illustration.
EFTA00008744-p-080.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten text on it, which appears to be an interview transcript. The text is black and includes various questions and answers that are too small to read clearly in this description. There's no specific location or significant object identifiable from the provided details.
EFTA00008744-p-075.jpg
The image is a scanned document, primarily textual with a few handwritten annotations. It appears to be an official form or report, possibly from a legal or law enforcement context given the content and format. The top of the document includes various sections with headers such as "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORTING EVIDENCE" and "AFFIDAVIT OF SUPPORT FOR THE INFANT CHILD." The text is too small to read clearly, but it seems to consist of questions (labeled Q) followed by answers (labeled A). The handwritten annotations include lines drawn through certain words or phrases, which could indicate redaction, correction, or emphasis. There's also a handwritten note on the right side that says "See page 10" next to what appears to be a date "7/3/2011." The document is filled with lines and text in a structured format, typical of formal written records, suggesting it could be part of an investigation or legal proceedings where evidence and statements are documented.
EFTA00008744-p-071.jpg
The image displays a piece of paper with handwritten notes on it. The notes appear to be related to some form of testimony or questioning session, as there are multiple questions and responses written down in black ink. One of the visible questions is "A. Did you both see what happened on December 29th?" followed by the word "Yes" indicating an answer to that question. There's also a mention of a person named "Mr. Baird," suggesting that he is someone involved in or related to the context of these notes. The text "Rachel" and "Larry" are also visible, potentially referring to individuals mentioned during the session. The handwriting suggests that it was written by an individual who is likely male based on the script's style.
EFTA00008744-p-070.jpg
The image shows a document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings. The document is printed and contains handwritten annotations. At the top, there's a section with "Q" marked as Question, followed by a line for an answer. There are several lines below this format, suggesting multiple questions and answers. One visible question reads, "What did you think when you learned about the new trial in September 1974?" The corresponding handwritten answer says, "I was afraid that I would be found guilty again." This indicates a personal account from someone who has previously faced legal consequences. The document is dated and signed at the bottom by an individual whose name and title are partially obscured. The visible part of the signature includes what seems to be "Court Reporter," suggesting that this person is responsible for taking down and transcribing statements during the proceedings.
EFTA00008744-p-068.jpg
The image shows a blurred piece of paper with text that is partially obscured by a red rectangle. The text within the visible parts includes a question and answer format. A specific question can be seen: "Q: What was your first impression about coming to this message board?" However, the rest of the question and all answers are cut off or hidden behind the red rectangle. Additionally, there is a phone number at the bottom right corner of the image. The overall quality and content of the image suggest it might be a scanned document or a photograph of a physical paper with handwritten notes.
EFTA00008744-p-067.jpg
The image you've shared appears to be a scanned document with handwritten content that is not entirely clear due to the quality of the scan and the way it was taken from an angle. The text seems to be written in black ink, but some words are obscured or cut off by the edges of the paper, making them difficult to read accurately. There is also a visible date at the top of the document "3/21/96". Please provide a clearer image or more context for a better description.
EFTA00008744-p-066.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes on it. The notes are organized into numbered items, suggesting a list of questions or topics for discussion. Some of the text in the notes is redacted, indicating sensitive or confidential information that has been obscured. The redaction is done by drawing lines through the text to make it unreadable. The document appears to be formal, possibly related to an investigation or legal proceedings given the context and style of the notes. There are no people visible in the image, as the focus is on the text and its content.
EFTA00008744-p-065.jpg
The image shows a document with handwritten notes and typed text on it. The paper appears to be a transcript of an interview or statement, as indicated by the numbered lines that correspond to questions (Q) and answers (A). There's visible text on the paper which seems to be obscured for privacy or security reasons. There are black marks covering parts of the document, presumably to conceal sensitive information such as names or personal details. The overall style of the image is straightforward and informational, with a focus on readability despite the redactions.
EFTA00008744-p-062.jpg
The image shows a handwritten note on paper with lines and numbers at the top, suggesting it could be part of an official document or interview transcript. The writing is in black ink, and there are some words crossed out with red pen, indicating corrections or emphasis on particular phrases. The person's name mentioned in the note appears to be "Commander Kevin Ralston"; however, the text is partially obscured by redaction marks that replace parts of the text with asterisks. The style of the image is straightforward and utilitarian, consistent with official records or legal documents.
EFTA00008744-p-061.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with handwritten content and some typed text. The majority of the information on the page is redacted, meaning sensitive or private details have been obscured to maintain privacy. However, from what can be seen, there are sections labeled "Q" for questions and "A" for answers, indicating an interview or question-and-answer session. There is a reference to a name in the typed text, but it too has been redacted. The document appears to be of an official nature, possibly related to law enforcement given the context provided by the visible fragments of text.
EFTA00008744-p-057.jpg
The image displays a page of handwritten notes or interview questions and answers, possibly related to an investigation or an assessment process, such as a psychological evaluation. There are several lines of text with different question numbers followed by the words "Answer" indicating where responses should be written. The content is partially redacted with black marks obscuring some information for privacy or legal reasons. The paper has a yellowish hue and appears to be aged, suggesting it might be from an older case or document.
EFTA00008744-p-055.jpg
The image is a photograph of a handwritten note on lined paper. The note appears to be from an interview or a conversation and includes several questions and answers related to the subject's experience with different tasks or activities. A few phrases in the text have been redacted, indicating sensitive or confidential information that has been purposely obscured. The person whose words are being transcribed seems to be discussing various aspects of their work or experiences, but without specific details it is not possible to provide more context about the content of the interview. The handwriting style suggests a casual and possibly hurried writing process, typical of someone trying to capture information quickly during an ongoing discussion.