Documents tagged "Court"
Found 352 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00014686.jpg
The image displays a document with an official appearance, which resembles a court order or legal notice from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. It is addressed to "Clarence Marrow" and dated December 23, 2021. The text refers to a civil case number (2:20-cv-00764) and includes instructions for service of process, such as delivering the document to the defendant via hand delivery or another specified method.
DOJ-OGR-00014628.jpg
The image displays a document with several paragraphs of text. The text appears to be a legal or official document as it is numbered and structured into distinct sections, each beginning with a number such as "1" followed by the title "I." The visible portion of the text includes phrases like "this Court" and "the Petitioner," which suggest that this could be part of a court proceeding or legal filing. At the bottom of the image, there is a signature with an illegible name, indicating that it was signed by someone in relation to the document's contents. The overall style of the image is typical for official documents, using black text on a white background and following formal formatting conventions.
DOJ-OGR-00014598.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with typed text, which appears to be a formal document such as a court order or legal notice. The content includes phrases like "DECISION AND ORDER" and "This matter comes before the Court," suggesting that it is related to a legal proceeding. There are lines and numbers on the left side indicating page numbering and possibly line numbering for reference within the document. The text is printed in black ink, and due to the angle of the photo, some words may be obscured or difficult to read.
DOJ-OGR-00008788.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court filing titled "United States District Court." It is related to a case involving the government and a person named "Pamela C. Smith." The document includes references to counts, charges, penalties, and statutes such as 18 U.S.C. ยง 641 (Theft of Government Property) and other sections that likely pertain to theft, fraud, or similar offenses. There is a section with handwritten notes that seem to be annotations or corrections made by the court or an attorney, discussing the penalties associated with each count in the case. The document also includes information about potential fines and terms of imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00008785.jpg
The image appears to be a digital screenshot of a document with text content. The text is primarily black against a white background and includes what seems to be a numbered list of statements or instructions, possibly related to legal proceedings or court appearances given the context provided by the visible text in the top left corner which mentions "Court Rules" and "Court Procedure." The numbering starts from 1 and continues at least until the point where the text is cut off in the image. The document's heading also includes a date and other information, but it is not fully legible due to the resolution of the image. There are no visible images or graphics within the document; it is purely textual in nature.
DOJ-OGR-00008758.jpg
The image displays a page of text that appears to be a legal document or court filing. At the top, there is a header with the title "Docket Number" followed by a redacted entry and "Page 1 of 2" indicating this is the first page in a two-page document set. Below the header are several lines of text which seem to list numbered paragraphs or points, each beginning with a number such as "1" and "2". The text includes phrases like "the Court" and "defendant" suggesting it refers to legal proceedings. There are no visible people or locations in the image; the focus is solely on the textual content of the document.
DOJ-OGR-00008702.jpg
The image is a scanned document from the United States District Court. It appears to be a notice of entry of an order and contains legal case information. The content includes the name of the case along with other identifiers such as file numbers, dates, and court locations. The text on the document is partially obscured due to the angle and quality of the scan, making it difficult to read all the details. There are no people visible in the image, and the focus is entirely on the textual content of the legal document.
DOJ-OGR-00005826.jpg
The image you've shared is a scanned document with the title "Court Order" at the top. The document is written in English and appears to be related to legal proceedings. Due to the resolution and angle of the photo, some parts of the text are not clearly legible. There are black lines through certain areas on the page, which may indicate redacted information. The overall style of the image suggests it's a formal or official piece of paper, possibly containing sensitive or confidential content.
DOJ-OGR-00002890.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document from the United States Court of Appeals. The heading "COURT OF APPEALS" is prominently displayed at the top, along with a red header that includes what seems to be an official stamp and possibly the court's logo or seal. Below this are two lines of text, which could indicate the case number and other identifying details of the legal proceeding. The body of the document contains more text, including section headings such as "Background" and "Discussion," suggesting that it is a formal legal document containing sections of arguments or points of law in relation to a court case. The style of the image suggests it's meant for official legal records and not decorative purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029013.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with text on it. The text appears to be an email or message conversation, with some of the words redacted by black lines. There's no clear indication of what the content of the conversation is due to these redactions. At the top right corner, there is a small watermark with "US District Court" written on it. The document itself has a faded appearance and looks like it might be an official court record or correspondence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028700.jpg
The image displays a printed document with several paragraphs of text. The text appears to be written in English and seems to discuss various topics including terrorism, intelligence sharing, and the role of institutions such as the Supreme Court and Parliament. There is visible text that provides context for these discussions, but due to the resolution and angle of the photo, some words are obscured or difficult to read clearly. The document appears formal with a structured layout typical of official or academic texts. There are no people, locations, or other significant objects in the image; it focuses solely on the printed text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012792.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with visible text on it. It appears to be an official or formal paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or court matters, as indicated by the text "Appeal from Circuit Court" at the top left corner. The rest of the text is not entirely legible due to the angle and resolution of the image. Additionally, there are two stamps on the document with the word "Filed" visible, suggesting that this paper has been processed or received by an official entity such as a court or government department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012784.jpg
The image shows a scanned document with visible text and some handwriting marks on the side. The writing is too small to read from this angle and resolution, but it appears to be a formal document, possibly related to a legal case given the context of "Utah State Supreme Court" mentioned in one line. There are no visible people or locations depicted as this is a text-based image.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033329.txt
The email discusses a story about China's plan to give behavioral report cards to its 22 million residents using mobile technology and existing state restrictions on electronic anonymity. The consequences of getting an "F" on this test can last a lifetime. The email also mentions the American holiday shopping season, Apple's financial struggles, and a statement by U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts criticizing President Donald Trump for implying that a federal judge appointed by Democratic President Barack Obama was partisan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
The document is an email notification regarding a notice of voluntary dismissal in case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA "Doe v. Trump et al" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that this case involves some sort of controversy or conflict involving Donald Trump and/or his associates, but the specific details are not provided in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt
The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.txt
This document is from a court case where Jane Doe is suing Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual assault that occurred in the mid-1990s. The initial status conference has been scheduled for December 16, 2016, and both parties are required to submit a joint letter providing information on the nature of the case, jurisdiction, venue, prior settlement discussions, and estimated trial length, among other things. The document is an order and notice from Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031972.txt
The document discusses a lawsuit against California, specifically its sanctuary policies for immigrants. Key people involved in the discussion include Thomas Fuller from New York Times, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Professor Vladeck from Yale University. The main topics covered are the legality of sanctuary city policies, immigration enforcement by federal versus state authorities, and political motivations behind lawsuits involving immigration issues.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.txt
The document reports on the death of a U.S. District Court judge who was presiding over a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and sex offender with connections to the Clintons. The judge's death has raised questions about the future of the case. Additionally, there is a mention of exploring Fox News apps at the end of the document.