Documents tagged "District Court"
Found 29 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029013.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document with text on it. The text appears to be an email or message conversation, with some of the words redacted by black lines. There's no clear indication of what the content of the conversation is due to these redactions. At the top right corner, there is a small watermark with "US District Court" written on it. The document itself has a faded appearance and looks like it might be an official court record or correspondence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
The document is an email notification regarding a notice of voluntary dismissal in case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA "Doe v. Trump et al" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that this case involves some sort of controversy or conflict involving Donald Trump and/or his associates, but the specific details are not provided in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032334.txt
This document discusses a legal case involving the dismissal of charges against a plaintiff named Jane Doe against defendants including Donald Trump. The case is titled "Doe v. Trump et al" and was filed in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York under case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA. The court documents indicate that the plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the charges against all defendants. The document is marked "Privileged - Redacted" and includes instructions for public access users regarding downloading copies of documents for free or at a fee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032329.txt
The document discusses a notice of voluntary dismissal in a case filed against Donald Trump and others. The plaintiff(s) have dismissed the action against all defendants under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This dismissal was filed by Jane Doe in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA, and document number 15.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.txt
This document is from a court case where Jane Doe is suing Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual assault that occurred in the mid-1990s. The initial status conference has been scheduled for December 16, 2016, and both parties are required to submit a joint letter providing information on the nature of the case, jurisdiction, venue, prior settlement discussions, and estimated trial length, among other things. The document is an order and notice from Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031823.txt
The document reports on the death of a U.S. District Court judge who was presiding over a lawsuit involving Jeffrey Epstein, a wealthy financier and sex offender with connections to the Clintons. The judge's death has raised questions about the future of the case. Additionally, there is a mention of exploring Fox News apps at the end of the document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031802.txt
A U.S. District Court judge in New York who was presiding over a lawsuit involving a wealthy, Clinton-connected financier and sex offender has passed away at the age of 96. The death of Judge Kenneth Conboy could impact the ongoing legal proceedings related to pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. This information was shared by J via email with David Schoen.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt
This document discusses a new development in a sex scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein, a South Florida billionaire money manager who was accused of running an international underage sex ring. The story has resurfaced due to the efforts of Fort Lauderdale lawyer Brad Edwards, who is representing two alleged victims identified as Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, both of whom are claiming that well-known criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, were involved in Epstein's international sex ring. Dershowitz denies these allegations. The case is currently being heard in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, with a focus on the alleged victims' attempt to use the Crime Victims' Rights Act to force the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute Epstein for various offenses related to sex trafficking and prostitution.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635.txt
The article discusses the importance of treating crime victims fairly in the criminal process by integrating them into federal rules of procedure. The author argues that current proposed amendments to these rules are inadequate and recommends broader measures for fully protecting crime victims' rights. The focus is on the Sixth Amendment and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), and how they relate to victim participation in the legal system.