Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Re"

Found 1224 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028958.txt

The document discusses a project related to a WA poetry release, which involves obtaining approval from Woody Allen for the use of his footage. The project is part of a larger initiative aimed at bringing poetry into mainstream English Language Arts classrooms and includes conversations with prominent figures such as Bill Clinton and Al Gore. The conversation would be part of a HarvardX online platform. The document also mentions Soon-Yi Previn, who expresses an open principle to the project but notes that the release would need to be reviewed by a lawyer.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028950.txt

The document is a collection of emails discussing various topics. It mentions people such as Lesley Groff, Jeffrey Epstein, Chomsky, Lisa New, Larry, and others. The places mentioned include Cambridge. Topics covered in the emails include poetry updates, thank you messages, advice on renewing a campaign, educational video on American poetry, financial support for an initiative, distribution of work, and appearing on camera.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028946.txt

In this document, Lisa New is writing a thank-you letter to her friends and supporters for their help in realizing the vision of Poetry in America, which is producing high quality educational video on American poetry. She mentions key people who have supported her initiative financially, intellectually, logistically, or by appearing on camera. The main places mentioned are Cambridge and Boston. The document also talks about starting a new campaign with Templeton funding, and the need for advice from Jeffrey E.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028942.txt

In the document, Jeffrey Epstein suggests to Joi Ito that President Obama should collaborate with China on building a new collider, which could improve his legacy in science. Epstein also mentions that he is interested in bio signal intelligence and notes that it seems like Obama has little interest in hard sciences. The email emphasizes confidentiality and privilege.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028939.txt

Lawrence Krauss is a professor at Arizona State University and director of the Origins Project, which focuses on science and society. In this email exchange with Jeffrey E., they discuss their opinions about religion's impact on people's lives and the dangers of fanaticism in both religious and secular contexts. They also talk about the importance of responding to irrational beliefs with argument and evidence rather than ridicule or disrespect for the individuals who hold those beliefs.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028936.txt

The email is from Lawrence Krauss, a professor at Arizona State University, who forwarded an article to Jeffrey E. The original sender of the article was Noam Chomsky. In their conversation, they discussed the topic of ridiculing ideas and agreed that it can be a valuable method for exposing inconsistencies or contravening evidence. They also mentioned nationalist fanaticism as being more dangerous than other forms of dogma.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028933.txt

In this email chain, Lawrence Krauss, director of the Origins Project at ASU, responds to an article about religion with skepticism, stating that while he doesn't believe in astrology or religious dogma, it is important to treat people who do hold such beliefs with respect and respond to them with evidence. Noam Chomsky and Jeffrey E. also weigh in on the discussion, expressing agreement with Krauss's stance.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt

The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028925.txt

The email is from Joi Ito to Jeffrey Epstein, discussing an email they received from a colleague of Epstein's regarding Alan Dershowitz. The colleague mentioned that it will be Dershowitz's new life mission and that there is bad press surrounding him. The email also mentions a dinner on an island with Bill Clinton and details where he was sitting. The email is marked as confidential and intended only for the addressee.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028924.txt

In the email conversation between Joi Ito and Jeffrey Epstein, they discuss Alan's reluctance to give up in the face of bad press. The topic of discussion also involves former President Bill Clinton, with allegations about his presence on Epstein's island being refuted. The conversation emphasizes the confidentiality of the information exchanged and requests that it only be used for confidential mail purposes.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028884.txt

This document discusses a proposal for contributing $500,000 to the Poetry in America initiative at Harvard University. The key participants include Lisa New and Jeffrey E., with Larry also mentioned as providing information about the project. The proposal seeks to use this money for post-production and distribution of a historical period of American poetry (1914-1945), including interviews with various individuals such as Bill Clinton, Peter Gallison, Walter Isaacson, Lena Dunham, Woody Allen, Harrison Ford, Robert Polito, Sarah Kay, Alfre Woodard, Jane Pickering, Jay Parini, and Ray D. The document also mentions the possibility of using alternative ways to give the money that would not involve Harvard University.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028875.txt

This email exchange between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discusses a news event involving Senator Reid's aide who was found guilty on seven counts of misconduct. The topic of the conversation is whether the aide could have been reinstated after being convicted once, and Jeffrey E. expresses disbelief that anyone would be so stupid to engage in such behavior again. The exchange also touches upon Kathy Ruemmler's travel plans and schedule for a conference.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028870.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discussing legal matters related to Reid and Governor's cases. They are debating the possibility of Reid's guy going down on all 7 counts, as well as whether or not Governor is Jewish. The conversation also touches upon scheduling and prioritization issues.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028866.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. discussing various topics including politics, public figures, and travel plans. The emails mention people such as Reid and Governor, places like New York and D.C., and events or situations involving trains and hospitals. Some emails have been truncated, making it difficult to summarize the content accurately. It seems that Kathy is providing information or updates to Jeffrey in a casual, conversational tone.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028862.txt

The document is a series of emails between Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E. The main topic discussed is the sentencing of Harry Reid's aide on seven counts. In addition to this topic, there are also discussions about managing schedules and prioritizing tasks effectively during an eventful week in New York City.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028859.txt

The document discusses a person named Reid who has been found guilty of seven counts in court, which is referred to as "Reid's guy going down on all 7 counts." The context suggests that the conversation is taking place in a professional setting, and one participant expresses concerns about not effectively prioritizing their schedule. Another person mentions meeting various high-profile individuals such as Thiel, Summers, Bill Burns, Gordon Brown, the President of Mongolia, Hardeep Puri (India), Boris (Gates), Jabor (Qatar), Sultan (Dubai), Kosslyn (Harvard), Leon Black, Woody, and other prominent figures. The document also includes references to girls and high-risk/reward situations in a professional context.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028856.txt

The document is an email conversation between two individuals. The main topics of discussion include travel plans and the handling of a work-related situation involving high risk/reward versus low risk/reward factors. Key people mentioned in the conversation are Kathy Ruemmler and Jeffrey E., with reference to Reid's guy who went down on all 7 counts.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028854.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails between two individuals discussing scheduling conflicts and managing priorities in a professional context. The sender mentions that they will have limited availability due to the Unga week, during which their boss is expected to be in town. They express concern about being able to manage all of their commitments effectively. The recipient responds by listing several people who are scheduled to be in town for various events such as a climate summit and a security council meeting. They also mention that they will need to prioritize high-risk, high-reward tasks over low-risk, low-reward tasks. Both individuals express frustration with the challenges of balancing professional responsibilities and personal needs.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028852.txt

In the document, Lesley Groff is Jeffrey Epstein's assistant and she is communicating with Ed Boyden regarding a call they need to schedule. It seems that both of them are trying to find an appropriate time for their conversation. Ed Boyden mentions his involvement in the Obama BRAIN Initiative and how it has affected his schedule. Lesley Groff also mentions Jeffrey Epstein's cancellation of a trip due to illness.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028850.txt

In the document, Joi Ito discusses a New York Times article about President Obama's response to the Ukraine crisis and its impact on the global hunt for Russian leader Vladimir Putin's hidden wealth. Jeffrey Epstein also mentions that the information contained in the communication is confidential and intended only for the use of the addressee.

PreviousPage 50 of 62Next