Documents tagged "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT"
Found 78 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00020570.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with text and a table. The document appears to be from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, as indicated by the header at the top. There's a large amount of text that seems to detail court proceedings or legal matters. At the bottom, there are two rows in a smaller font that could possibly be footnotes or additional information related to the content above. The background is not very distinct due to the focus on the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00014658.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a heading that reads "United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri". Below the heading is an entry dated "Dec 20 2001" in red ink, followed by the title "Notice of Publication". The text within the document contains information about court proceedings and instructions related to a specific case. There are no visible people or locations depicted in the image. The style of the document suggests it is an official legal notice, typically used for matters such as service of process when a party's whereabouts are unknown or evasive.
DOJ-OGR-00002867.jpg
The image shows a document with a formal header that includes an emblem and text identifying it as from the "United States District Court" for a specific district (though the name is not completely visible). The document appears to be an official legal notice, possibly an order or decision by the court, based on its structured layout with numbered paragraphs and references to case numbers and parties involved in litigation. The text includes terms such as "Defendant's Motion", "Plaintiff's Opposition", and "ORDER AND OPINION", suggesting a legal proceeding has taken place. There is also mention of a case number, but it's partially obscured. The document is marked with the date "March 23, 2017" and has a barcode at the bottom left corner.
DOJ-OGR-00002866.jpg
The image you've shared is quite blurry and rotated, making it challenging to read the text clearly. From what I can discern, there appears to be some sort of official document, possibly related to a court case or legal proceeding in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. The text includes words such as "Case No." followed by a number, and other standard legal headings that are typically found on documents from a district court. If you have any specific questions about this type of document or its context, feel free to ask!
DOJ-OGR-00008899.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text and some redacted sections where information has been hidden from view. The visible text includes phrases such as "the defendant" and "United States District Court Western District of Washington at Seattle," suggesting that the document is related to a legal case or proceeding in a federal court district located in Washington state. There are page numbers at the bottom right corner indicating that this is page 4 of a larger document. The redacted sections appear as solid lines across the text, obscuring the information they contain.
DOJ-OGR-00008893.jpg
The image displays a document titled "United States District Court Central District of California" at the top. The text within the document is dense and refers to legal matters such as court proceedings, case numbers, and deadlines for filings. It appears to be an official notice or order related to legal cases in the central district of California, but specific details are not clear due to the resolution of the image. There are also sections that likely refer to specific court rules or procedures, though they are too small to read accurately. The document has a formal layout typical for legal documents with text aligned on the left side and page numbers at the top.
DOJ-OGR-00008843.jpg
The image displays a document with text content, which appears to be a formal letter or report. The document is titled "RE: COMPLIANCE" at the top and has a header that includes a recipient's name and address followed by "United States District Court." There are several paragraphs of text beneath this heading. The font is standard for official documents, suggesting it could be from a legal or corporate context. The document also contains a footer with additional information, but the specific content in the footer is not fully visible due to the image resolution.
DOJ-OGR-00008870.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois" and a subheading "Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber" at the top. Below this, there is a list titled "Plaintiffs' Witness List" which includes names such as "Jane Doe" and other fictitious names often used in court documents to protect privacy. The document has visible redactions, with lines drawn through certain parts of the text, likely to obscure sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. The background is a standard white paper, and there's no additional context provided beyond what can be read from the text on the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00008863.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official notice from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The text is clear and legible, but sensitive information has been redacted to protect privacy or confidentiality. At the bottom, there's a signature, possibly indicating the sender or the judge's chambers who issued this notice. A phone number is also provided for contact purposes. The document has a formal layout with a header, body text, and a footer that includes the signature.
DOJ-OGR-00014686.jpg
The image displays a document with an official appearance, which resembles a court order or legal notice from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. It is addressed to "Clarence Marrow" and dated December 23, 2021. The text refers to a civil case number (2:20-cv-00764) and includes instructions for service of process, such as delivering the document to the defendant via hand delivery or another specified method.
DOJ-OGR-00008788.jpg
The image shows a document that appears to be an official court filing titled "United States District Court." It is related to a case involving the government and a person named "Pamela C. Smith." The document includes references to counts, charges, penalties, and statutes such as 18 U.S.C. § 641 (Theft of Government Property) and other sections that likely pertain to theft, fraud, or similar offenses. There is a section with handwritten notes that seem to be annotations or corrections made by the court or an attorney, discussing the penalties associated with each count in the case. The document also includes information about potential fines and terms of imprisonment.
DOJ-OGR-00008702.jpg
The image is a scanned document from the United States District Court. It appears to be a notice of entry of an order and contains legal case information. The content includes the name of the case along with other identifiers such as file numbers, dates, and court locations. The text on the document is partially obscured due to the angle and quality of the scan, making it difficult to read all the details. There are no people visible in the image, and the focus is entirely on the textual content of the legal document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029416.txt
Radar Online LLC is suing the Federal Bureau of Investigation for not releasing records related to its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the FBI has withheld these records despite a properly filed Freedom of Information Act request. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet based in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.txt
The document is a complaint filed by Radar Online LLC against the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint seeks to compel the FBI to produce records concerning its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet, while the FBI is a component of the Department of Justice. The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B), with venue being appropriate under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) as Radar's principal place of business is New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023361.txt
This document is a court brief filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in relation to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The brief addresses dismissals for failure to state a claim and foreign sovereign immunity among other issues. Key people involved include Ronald L. Motley, Stephen A. Cozen, Carter G. Phillips, Andrea Bierstein, Robert M. Kaplan, James P. Kreindler, Jerry S. Goldman, and Chris Leonardo. The document is titled "In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001" and includes a list of cases related to the attacks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017904.txt
The document discusses a court case regarding the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The plaintiffs brought actions against various entities and individuals alleged to have provided support to the terrorist organization responsible for the attacks or its members and associates. The District Court held that several defendants were entitled to immunity under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) and that other allegations in the complaint failed to state a claim under certain laws.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714.txt
This document discusses proposed amendments to the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure in light of the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The author, Paul G. Cassell, a law professor at the University of Utah and a federal district court judge, argues that crime victims should be more fully recognized within these rules. He suggests several specific changes to ensure that victims are treated with fairness and respect throughout the criminal justice process.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011304.txt
The document appears to be a court case summary, specifically from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in a case between Virginia Giuffre and Ghislaine Maxwell. The case has been assigned case number 15 Civ. 7433 (RWS). The hearing took place on March 31, 2017, at 10:10 am. In the document, the court is addressing a motion to dismiss brought by Maxwell. The judge and attorneys are discussing the scope of the allegations and whether they pertain to sexual abuse or defamation. The plaintiff's attorney clarifies that their claim is solely about the truth or falsity of statements made by Maxwell concerning Giuffre's allegations, but not about her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein.