Documents tagged "District"
Found 132 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00021903.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a piece of paper with printed text on it. The text is not completely legible due to the quality and angle of the photo, but there are some discernable words such as "The District Court" and "Florida." It seems like a formal document or notice from a legal entity in Florida. There is also a red stamp at the top right corner that reads "Received" followed by dates and times, indicating when this document was received by a certain office or individual. The background of the image is blurry and indistinct, which makes it difficult to determine any additional context about the location or surroundings where the photograph was taken.
DOJ-OGR-00021900.jpg
The image is a low-resolution photograph of a document page with printed text. The text includes references to New York City and various legal entities such as "Judge Alison Nathan" and "Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein." The context suggests that this is part of an official court case, specifically mentioning the "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York." There are no visible people or locations in the image other than what is implied by the text itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021894.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document page, with a focus on the title and the first paragraph. The title reads "P. The District Court's Decision to Dismiss New Trial Motion from new trial motion from defendant" in bold font. Below this, there is a paragraph that starts with a sentence mentioning that the court has reviewed certain filings and evidence submitted by the parties involved in a legal proceeding. However, the rest of the text is too small to read clearly. The photograph appears to be taken under indoor lighting conditions, as indicated by the shadow cast on the right side of the document. The paper looks like standard photocopy or printer paper, and there are no people or identifiable locations visible in the image.
DOJ-OGR-00021886.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document, specifically a court order from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The title "ORDER" is prominently displayed at the top in bold letters. Below the title are the names of the judge and the case number. The text within the document is related to a legal matter involving the U.S. Department of Justice, NASA, and SpaceX. There is no visible text that would identify any individuals or locations other than those mentioned in the context of the court order.
DOJ-OGR-00021879.jpg
The image displays a document with text on it. The document appears to be an official court ruling, as indicated by the reference to "United States District Court for the Southern District of New York" and the inclusion of case numbers such as "10 Civ. 7458(MKB)". The text is not fully legible due to the image quality, but it seems to discuss a legal decision regarding an individual named "Dr. Bruce V. Bigelow". There are no people or other significant objects visible in the image apart from the document itself. The style of the document suggests a formal and serious tone, which is typical for legal proceedings.
DOJ-OGR-00021877.jpg
The image is a scanned document titled "MANDATE" at the top. The document appears to be an official court mandate with sections filled out for a case that involves a defendant named John Doe and a prosecutor. It references criminal cases in New York City, specifically District Attorney's Office, Bronx County, Criminal Court. There are two signatures at the bottom of the page, one appearing to be from "Honorable John J. Walsh" and another by an individual whose name is partially obscured, indicating their status as a peace officer or similar official role. The document includes various lines with checkmarks next to each item, suggesting that certain options have been selected. There are also barcodes and handwritten annotations on the document.
DOJ-OGR-00021850.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with text and numbers. The top of the page has red text that includes "U.S. District Court Southern District of New York" followed by an address in Manhattan. Below this, there is a series of dates, numbers, names, and locations related to legal proceedings or documents. There are also some handwritten annotations on the document, such as underlining certain words and numbers, possibly indicating important information or for highlighting purposes. The overall style of the image suggests it's a formal paper, likely associated with a court proceeding.
DOJ-OGR-00021849.jpg
The image shows a document with text. The document appears to be a legal or official report, possibly related to a court case, as suggested by the redacted text and formatting indicative of legal documents. The title at the top is partially visible but obscured by redaction marks. The body of the document includes sections with headings such as "Introduction" and "Defendants' Conduct in Relation to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York," followed by a narrative that seems to describe actions taken by certain individuals or entities within a legal context. There are also references to specific dates and the United States District Court, suggesting this is an official court document.
DOJ-OGR-00021845.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. At the top, there is red text that reads "Docket Entry" and below it, in black font on a white background, is a series of numbers and letters, possibly a case number or docket identification. The document contains various lines of text, including headings such as "CIVIL COVER SHEET" and other items like the names of individuals, addresses, telephone numbers, and email addresses. These details suggest that the document is related to legal proceedings in New York, specifically within a court system that handles civil matters.
DOJ-OGR-00021824.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document titled "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit". The top right corner features a barcode with numbers beneath it, likely for tracking purposes. Below the title, there's a section labeled "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas", indicating the origin of the appeal. The document appears to be an official court filing, possibly related to a legal case appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. It includes details such as a case number and sections titled 'Docketed' and 'Filed' with corresponding dates.
DOJ-OGR-00021811.jpg
The image displays a document titled "P. The District Court of New York's Decision to Dismiss the Motion." It appears to be an official legal document discussing court proceedings related to a specific case in New York. The text includes references to "Plaintiff," "Defendant," and various legal points and arguments that are typical in such documents. The font is formal, suggesting the gravity of the legal context. There are no visible people or other objects aside from the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021796.jpg
The image displays a page of legal documents with various texts and sections labeled as "Introduction" and "Background." The document appears to be related to a case or court proceedings, referencing dates such as "December 2014" and "Page 29" along with the name "Johnson." There is also text indicating that the document is from "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York." The style of the image suggests it is a digital representation or scan of an official court or legal report, written in English.
DOJ-OGR-00021789.jpg
The image displays a document with the title "SUBPOENA DUces TECUM" printed at the top. The subpoena is directed to "The Manager of United States Office for Civil Rights, Department of Education" and addressed to a specific individual. It mentions the District Court for the Western District of Missouri and specifies a date and time. Additionally, it indicates that the recipient has been served with this document on March 12th, as noted by handwriting at the top left corner. The text in the image is predominantly in English, and there are no visible people or locations other than those mentioned within the subpoena itself.
DOJ-OGR-00021784.jpg
The image shows a document with redacted information at the top left corner where the name and address of an individual are typically found. Below that, there is text which appears to be from a legal document or formal letter, though specific details have been obscured. The visible part includes phrases like "United States District Court" and "NOTICE OF HEARING." The font is standard for official documents, and the color of the text is black on a white background. There's no indication of people or locations in the document itself, as it focuses solely on textual information.
DOJ-OGR-00021774.jpg
The image is a photograph of a document that appears to be an official court proceeding, specifically from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The document includes a header with the title "THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA" in bold text at the top. Below this, there is a subtitle or section heading that reads "CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-0675" and a docket number. The visible body of the document contains additional text related to the legal proceedings, but it is too small to read in detail. At the bottom right corner of the page, there is a signature line with the name "Judge Gertner" above it.
DOJ-OGR-00021760.jpg
The image displays a printed document with black ink on white paper. It contains several paragraphs of text that appear to be related to legal proceedings or official statements. The text is too small and blurry to read in detail, but there are visible phrases such as "Ninth Circuit Court" and "U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York." These phrases suggest that the document may pertain to court cases within the United States judicial system. There are no people or significant objects other than text on this printed page.
DOJ-OGR-00021758.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with text on it, which appears to be a legal or official document given the context and style of formatting. The text includes references to sections of a law or code, as well as phrases such as "United States District Court for the District of Hawaii" and other legalese. There is no visible person in this image; only the printed text on the paper is presented.
DOJ-OGR-00021750.jpg
The image displays a section of a document, which appears to be an official court order from the US District Court for the Northern District of California. The text is redacted in various parts, including sensitive information such as names and contact details. However, visible portions show that it's related to a case number and includes standard legal language. There are no people or significant objects other than what appears to be a court seal at the top left corner of the document.
DOJ-OGR-00021744.jpg
The image is a scanned document with printed text on it. The title of the document reads "DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA" followed by a subtitle that says "NOTICE OF HEARING AND ORDER." Below this, there are numbered items, likely listing topics or instructions related to a legal hearing or proceeding in the District of Columbia. There is also some text at the bottom right corner which seems to be a page number "-2-," indicating that this is the second page of a multi-page document. The document appears to be formal and official, possibly related to a court order or a governmental notice.
DOJ-OGR-00021741.jpg
The image is a screenshot of a court document from the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri, specifically a Notice to Appear at a hearing on September 17, 2018. The notice is addressed to an individual named David A. Garrison and includes important details about the hearing, such as its time (9:30 AM) and location (Room 616 in the Thomas Eagleton United States Courthouse). It also provides a phone number for more information if needed. Additionally, there are instructions on how to respond or appear, emphasizing that failure to do so may result in serious consequences such as entry of judgment against the defendant or dismissal of their case.