Documents tagged "michigan"
Found 6 documents with this tag
EFTA00008998-p-18.jpg
The image shows a legal document with text. The text at the top of the page reads "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION" followed by "IN THE MATTER OF: JOEL R. KEISLING'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY." There are various numbered paragraphs and headings, indicating that this is a structured legal filing. The document appears to be in black ink on white paper with visible page numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00021799.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with red lettering on the top left corner indicating it is Page 217 of a legal case. The page is numbered "217" at the bottom right corner. The text on the document discusses a court decision related to a person named Dr. James Morrissey, who was sentenced to two years in federal prison for illegal drug distribution and one year in state prison for sexual assault on a female patient, which is deemed as second-degree criminal sexual conduct under Michigan law. The text also mentions that Dr. Morrissey's state sentence would be served concurrently with his federal sentence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033171.txt
This document is an email exchange between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey E. about US election updates. Zubair has processed tweets related to the presidential debate and found that Clinton's popularity has increased with 62% support, while Trump has huge support in Ohio and New Jersey. Clinton is likely to win in New York, California, and Michigan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032324.txt
This document summarizes the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the US election based on captured tweets from November 1st. The chances of winning for both candidates are listed, as well as their respective chances of winning in various US states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026627.txt
The document provides an analysis of the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in three US presidential election debates held on October 19, 2016. It shows that both candidates received positive and negative feedback from social media users, with Trump receiving more negative feedback than Clinton. Additionally, the document provides data on each candidate's chances of winning the election based on state-by-state projections. Overall, the analysis suggests that while both candidates had their strengths and weaknesses, they both faced challenges in winning certain states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026321.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the topic of Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) and its potential effects on political outcomes. One person mentions that there are empirical studies showing RCV increases turnout, while another notes that extremists may run under RCV but centrists could defeat them. Another person discusses how RCV could have impacted the 2016 US presidential election, suggesting that Bernie Sanders could have run as an independent without risking a Trump victory if RCV had been used.