Documents tagged "review"
Found 28 documents with this tag
EFTA00009116-p-031.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned copy of a document with handwritten notes and corrections. The top part has "Questionnaire for Review" written on it in bold letters. Below this heading is a list numbered from one to fifteen, which seems to be a series of questions or prompts. Each number is followed by a line of text that appears to be a question or statement related to an investigation or review process. The style of the document suggests it might be used for gathering information or responses during an interview or inquiry.
EFTA00005191-p-92.jpg
The image shows a yellow slip of paper with black text on it. The text reads "ITEM WAS NOT SCANNED" followed by "Description" which is left blank for filling in. At the bottom, there's additional text that says "Official Documentation" and includes an instruction "Review July 17 2023." The style of the image suggests it could be a warning or notification slip intended to inform someone about an item not being scanned, possibly within a logistics or inventory system.
EFTA00005191-p-84.jpg
The image displays a collection of photos presented as thumbnails on what appears to be an online platform, possibly for photo sharing or review purposes. Each thumbnail shows a picture with various subjects and locations, including landscapes, skies, people, and what seems to be animals like cows. Some thumbnails have red rectangles superimposed over them, indicating that these images are being reviewed or marked in some way. The text on the image is too small to read clearly without zooming in, but it might provide additional context about the photos, such as titles, descriptions, ratings, or categories. There are no visible brands or logos that could be identified at this level of resolution.
EFTA00004898-p-24.jpg
The image shows a printed photograph that appears to have been taken with a digital camera. The photo is pasted into an album page and has been marked with what seems like post-it notes of various colors, indicating different actions such as "Edit" and possibly review status, with some sections highlighted in yellow, suggesting they may need attention or are important. The text on the post-its includes phrases like "Review 2019/08/12," which suggests a date for reviewing these images, and other similar notations. There is no visible text on the original photo within the album. The style of the image looks personal, possibly from a family or travel album.
EFTA00004663-p-078.jpg
The image shows a collection of photographs arranged on what appears to be a contact sheet, typically used by photographers to review and select images for printing. In each frame, there is a red helicopter parked in various outdoor settings. The environment suggests the photos were taken during daylight with natural lighting. There are no texts or people visible in these snapshots. The style of photography seems candid, capturing everyday scenes rather than staged or posed subjects.
EFTA00004477-p-061.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of several printed photos and notes arranged on a surface, possibly for review or discussion. The photos are small, showing various scenes that are too indistinct to discern clearly. There is visible text in the upper left corner, which seems to be a title or heading, but it's too small to read accurately. Some of the printed material includes annotations with arrows pointing at certain areas within the photographs, indicating a focus on specific details or elements in each image. The overall style suggests an analytical or critical review process for these images, possibly related to photography or visual arts.
EFTA00004250-p-54.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with printed and handwritten text. At the top, there is a bold statement saying "CSM NOT SCANNED" followed by an underlined section. The handwritten text below that says "51 Thumbnails." Additionally, at the bottom, it reads "Official Document Review 2014." The style of the image suggests it may be a screenshot or a photograph taken to show this particular document for reference or compliance purposes.
DOJ-OGR-00006823.jpg
The image displays the first page of a research paper titled "Sexual Grooming of Children: Review of Psychological Literature and Theoretical Frameworks" by Emily Brown and Elizabeth McAllister. It includes an abstract and an introduction, as well as references to studies and theories relevant to the topic. The text is in black against a white background, formatted in a standard academic paper style with headings, subheadings, paragraphs, and page numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00026298.jpg
The image shows a document with various sections of information. At the top left, there is a heading "Bureau of Prisons" followed by another heading "Last Accountability Review." Below this section, there are two columns filled with text; the right column has some form of numerical data, while the left column contains a list of names, dates, and other information. The document appears to be related to some sort of reporting or review within the context of federal prisons. There's a watermark-like text at the bottom that reads "Sensitive Information - For Official Use Only." The overall style of the image suggests it is a scanned copy or photograph of an official report or log.
DOJ-OGR-00026115.jpg
The image is a scanned document of an official form titled "COGIC Review." It includes various checkboxes and fields to be filled out with information, although the content is not fully legible due to the resolution and angle at which it was taken. The text on the form appears to pertain to some sort of review or assessment process, as indicated by the heading and layout. The image quality suggests it might have been taken from a smartphone camera or similar device, with some distortion and blurriness around the edges where the document does not align perfectly with the camera's view.
DOJ-OGR-00025629.jpg
The image displays a computer screen with an open email message. The email appears to be from "Sally Psychologist" and the subject line reads "Medical Review Updates." There's text within the body of the email, but due to the resolution or angle at which the photo was taken, it is not legible. The style of the image is a typical screenshot or photograph of a digital display, with visible window elements such as title bars and scroll bars.
DOJ-OGR-00025586.jpg
The image is a scanned document with redacted text and signatures. It appears to be a letter or form of some kind, possibly related to research as indicated by the title "Research Ethics Review" at the top. The redacted sections suggest that personal information or sensitive content has been removed for privacy reasons. The layout includes lines for recipients' names and addresses, followed by a body of text which is not fully visible due to redaction. There are also date fields labeled "Date" and "Subject," though these areas are blank in the image. The document is printed on standard white paper, and there are no visible images or graphics besides the text.
DOJ-OGR-00025506.jpg
The image displays a document with various sections of text, some redacted, indicating that it is an official form or letter with sensitive information obscured for privacy. The visible text includes phrases like "No Date," "Institutional Review Board Supplement," and part of an address that reads "1301 E. 6th St," suggesting that this could be related to a university or academic institution. There are also names and roles mentioned in the document, including someone referred to as "Dr." with the title of "Chair of Dept." The document is likely associated with research ethics, given the context provided by the visible text.
DOJ-OGR-00021776.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with several sections of text and lists. The visible part includes what seems to be an agenda for a meeting or event, along with the names and positions of individuals who are expected to attend. There's mention of a board member, an executive director, a general manager, and others who will participate in discussions on topics such as "Board Review of Executive Director's Contract" and other operational matters. The text is formal and structured, suggesting an official or corporate setting.
DOJ-OGR-00025333.jpg
The image displays a document titled "Special Education Review" from the Department of Justice, with various checkboxes and sections filled out, indicating responses to different questions. There's no visual content within these descriptions; they are just placeholders for future sentences.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028937.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of an email message. The content of the email is partially visible and discusses an issue regarding an "Administrative Review" with a specific deadline mentioned. There are names that seem to be involved in this matter, but they are redacted for privacy. The sender's name is also present in the email header. At the bottom of the image, there's text that reads "United States Office of Personnel Management."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028877.jpg
The image shows a printed document with multiple paragraphs of text. The document appears to be a formal report or study due to its structured layout and the presence of what seem to be data tables or graphs within the content. In the lower right corner, there's an additional block of text that reads "Appendix B: Literature Review." At the top of the image, there is a watermark with the text "Utah Statesman" indicating the source or publication associated with this document. The style of the image is straightforward and informational, typical for academic or professional documents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033243.txt
The document discusses an article from the National Review that critiques Donald Trump's abilities as a salesman. The article is written by Kathy Ruemmler and is titled "Donald Trump Can't Close Deal, Failing Salesman". It argues that Trump is not able to close deals effectively and is more of a "salesman" than a politician or business leader. The author also criticizes Trump for his lack of leadership skills and inability to build strong relationships with people in positions of power.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030773.txt
This is an email conversation between Jeffrey E. and Michael Wolff discussing several topics. They mention people such as Lorin Stein, Israel Horovitz, Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, Arthur Sulzberger, Woody Allen, and Donald Trump. The focus of their discussion seems to be on the current cultural climate with regards to sexual misconduct allegations and political issues related to President Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030771.txt
In the email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Michael Wolff, they discuss the current state of affairs involving various public figures, such as Lorin Stein, Israel Horovitz, Michael Douglas, Larry Gagosian, Arthur Sulzberger, Woody Allen, Harvey Weinstein, Glenn Simpson, Donald Trump, Ronan Farrow, and Steve Bannon. The conversation appears to be focused on the impact of recent events and allegations in media and politics, with Jeffrey E. expressing concerns about friends who may be involved.