Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Arizona"

Found 42 documents with this tag

DOJ-OGR-00006426.jpg

The image is a document with visible text that appears to be related to a court proceeding, specifically a "JUDGMENT STATEMENT" from the District Court for Maricopa County in Arizona. The names and specific details are redacted, but there are references to defendants, plaintiffs, and case numbers. There's mention of a jury trial resulting in a verdict, as well as monetary awards or judgements for certain parties involved in the case. The document has been altered with redacted information to prevent identification.

DOJ-OGR-00006031.jpg

The image is a scanned document, likely from a legal proceeding given the context provided by the text and headers. The document contains printed text with handwritten signatures at various points. The top of the page includes a header with an address and contact information for "Arizona Corporation Commission" followed by the title "Case No. S-1500-G96-CE" and additional information that is partially obscured or cut off in the image. There are also sections titled "APPLICATION," "ORDER OF COMMISSION," and other formal phrases typically found in legal or administrative documents. The bottom right corner has a handwritten signature with a date written below it.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033068.txt

The document is an email exchange between Jeffrey E. and Lawrence Krauss discussing a letter that was published in the media about something negative related to Chile. Lawrence Krauss is canceling his flight to Chile and is seeking feedback on the situation from Jeffrey E. They plan to talk tomorrow. The email also mentions a 10-year celebration for the Origins Project at ASU.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032992.txt

In this email exchange, Lawrence Krauss, director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University, expresses concern over President Trump's approach to science and space exploration. Jeffrey E. writes back, suggesting that Krauss's concerns are misplaced and that Trump will actually decimate climate change through his support for verifiable projects. The email also mentions a NASA bill aimed at landing on Mars.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032812.txt

The document is an email from Lawrence Krauss to Jeffrey E. regarding the investigation of Rubenfeld at Yale for conduct with female law students. The investigation was initiated before Kavanaugh's nomination to the high court and focused on his conduct, particularly with female law students. Rubenfeld stated that he did not know what he is alleged to have said or done and that the allegations were not of the kind that would jeopardize his position as a long-tenured member of the faculty. The email emphasizes the confidential and privileged nature of the information contained within.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032716.txt

The document shows a series of email exchanges between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. The conversation revolves around the topic of publishing trash, with Krauss seeking advice from Jeffrey on how to handle this situation. The email thread indicates that Krauss has cancelled his flight to Chile and is now in Portland. At one point, Jeffrey suggests that Krauss should distinguish himself from Trump. It seems like there's a sense of urgency or concern in the conversation, as Lawrence mentions that he needs Jeffrey's feedback on the letter and that they are contacting students and postdocs. The email chain also includes attachments such as an image named "image002.png".

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032522.txt

Lawrence Krauss, a professor at Arizona State University, wrote to Jeffrey E. expressing concern about the impact of Trump's budget cuts on science and human space exploration. He mentioned that the proposed cuts will decimate real science, particularly particle physics, and end funding for him personally. He also criticized Trump's focus on big and showy projects like rocket size rather than supporting science itself.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032520.txt

The document is a series of emails between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. discussing politics and science. Lawrence Krauss expresses his disappointment with the current administration's approach to supporting science, stating that it is all about "the size of the rocket" rather than contributing to scientific progress. He also mentions that he is the Director of The Origins Project at ASU and a Foundation Professor in the School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department. Jeffrey E. shares an article from The Washington Post regarding NASA's budget and its aim to land on Mars, but Lawrence Krauss responds with further criticism of the administration's policies.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032519.txt

Lawrence Krauss is the Director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University and a Foundation Professor in the School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department. He expressed concerns about President Trump's focus on space exploration, stating that it was not contributing to science but rather serving as an opportunity for glory. In response, Jeffrey E. sent Krauss an article from The Washington Post about President Trump signing a NASA bill aimed at landing on Mars.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032281.txt

The report presents data on the presidential election, analyzing tweets about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton from September. Trump's negative impressions were high, especially in Florida, while his positive impression was high in New York. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton received more negative impressions than positive ones, with California being her most popular state for positive impressions. The data shows a significant discrepancy between the two candidates' approval ratings across different states in the US.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032209.txt

This is an email exchange between lawkrauss and jeevacation discussing their travel plans to London and Paris, with a side discussion about a dream app idea and a potential challenge for Arizona State University (ASU).

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032206.txt

Lawkrauss, a professor from Arizona, is facing allegations of inappropriate conduct in Australia and has been asked to sign a paper acknowledging the investigation. He is considering bringing a lawyer or recording the meeting with the Title IX officer. Jeevacation advises consulting a lawyer but emphasizes being cooperative at this stage. The matter appears to be internal discipline rather than a Title IX issue, and they discuss the urgency of the situation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031972.txt

The document discusses a lawsuit against California, specifically its sanctuary policies for immigrants. Key people involved in the discussion include Thomas Fuller from New York Times, Justice Antonin Scalia, and Professor Vladeck from Yale University. The main topics covered are the legality of sanctuary city policies, immigration enforcement by federal versus state authorities, and political motivations behind lawsuits involving immigration issues.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031676.txt

In this email exchange, Lawrence Krauss informs Jeffrey E. that he will be taking a voluntary leave from his position as Chair of the Board at the Bulletin, allowing him and the board to make positive statements about each other. Jeffrey E. advises Lawrence Krauss to concentrate on refuting charges made against him in an article by breaking them down into categories such as ludicrous, ogling, jokes, and so on.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031556.txt

In the document, Lawrence Krauss is discussing a situation where he has received criticism and negative publicity due to an announcement about him and buzzfeed. He mentions that he is taking a voluntary leave as Chair of the Board from The Origins Project at ASU, which is directed by him, in order to make nice statements and improve relations with the board. Krauss expresses his hope for the future and references the upcoming 10 year celebration of the Origins Project at Arizona State University.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031433.txt

The document appears to be an email exchange between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey E. regarding allegations of sexual harassment. In the emails, Krauss denies having sex with someone and explains that they mutually decided against it. He also mentions his position as Director of The Origins Project at Arizona State University and provides contact information for himself and others in his office.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031269.txt

The email exchange discusses allegations of sexual harassment against Dr. Lawrence Krauss, a prominent scientist and director at Arizona State University's Origins Project. The sender inquires about the validity of the accusations and seeks advice on how to respond. It is suggested that mutual decisions were made during encounters in 2006, but the question remains why multiple women have accused him over more than a decade.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031079.txt

In the document, Jeffrey Epstein is mentioned as being in Paris and Lawrence Krauss expresses gratitude for their friendship. The topic of Epstein's involvement with underage girls is discussed, with Krauss stating that he believes Epstein did not know their age and was unaware of any wrongdoing. It is also stated that everyone involved was a victim and there were no happy resolutions or consequences from these activities.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031074.txt

This document appears to be an email exchange between Lawrence Krauss, a professor at Arizona State University, and Jeffrey Epstein regarding statements made in the Daily Beast about Epstein's alleged sexual activities. The main topic of discussion is the evidence supporting these allegations and whether or not they are true. In this exchange, Krauss expresses his friendship with Epstein and mentions that he has not heard from him recently.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031069.txt

The document appears to be a series of emails between Lawrence Krauss and Jeffrey Epstein about a statement in the Daily Beast. The key people mentioned are Lawrence Krauss, Jeffrey Epstein, and Rebecca Watson. The topic of discussion seems to involve sex and evidence, with one person suggesting that another person was the victim in this case, but there was no happy resolution or consequences of these activities. It is not clear where the events took place, but it could be inferred that they are discussing a controversial issue involving law enforcement.

Page 1 of 3Next