Oversight Explorer Logo

House Oversight Document Explorer

Search and explore committee documents

Documents tagged "Jane Doe"

Found 33 documents with this tag

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030199.txt

In June 2016, a lawsuit was filed against Donald Trump for the rape and sexual assault of a 13-year-old girl at a party hosted by Jeffrey Epstein. The witness in the suit claimed to have seen the child perform various sexual acts on Trump and Epstein after being advised that she was a minor. The lawsuit was dropped four days before the election, with Jane Doe's attorneys citing "numerous threats" against her.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029893.txt

The document is a series of email exchanges between Jeffrey Epstein and Jessica Cadwell, with additional participants like Jacquie Johnson and other paralegals. The emails discuss the scheduling and rescheduling of depositions for Ms. Maxwell, as well as the deposition of Mr. Trump. The emails mention that one individual has filed an emergency protective order, while another is trying to get service on Maxwell. The emails are from August 2009, and they show coordination between different parties involved in legal proceedings.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029889.txt

The email exchange discusses the service of legal documents on a person named Maxwell and provides updates about scheduling for a case involving Trump. The names mentioned in the conversation are Jessica Cadwell, Robert D. Critton Jr., Connie Zaguirre, Jacquie Johnson, Jane Doe, Jack Goldberger, Jeffrey Epstein, frJaca &dazeEE e9), Yccia', and BURMAN CRITTON LUTTIER & COLEMAN, LLP located at 515 N. Flagler Drive in West Palm Beach, FL 33401. The correspondence is between paralegals working for the law firm Burman Critton Lutier & Coleman, LLP and includes updates on case schedules and legal service efforts.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029880.txt

The document is a series of email exchanges between Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson concerning the status of legal proceedings involving Jane Doe. The two individuals discuss the scheduling of depositions, attempts to serve Ghislaine Maxwell with legal documents, and whether or not they have received specific information related to the case. The context suggests that this is a sensitive matter, as it involves privileged and redacted information.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029398.txt

A lawsuit alleging that Donald Trump raped a 13-year-old girl has new life with the addition of Florida criminal defense lawyer J. Cheney Mason as counsel. The suit was initially filed pro se by "Katie Johnson" in Los Angeles federal court in April, but with Mason's involvement, it now has more serious implications and is likely to garner more attention and scrutiny.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029315.txt

This document lists the names and contact information of attorneys at the law firm MPanish in West Palm Beach, Florida. The attorneys are organized alphabetically by last name and include partners, shareholders, paralegals, and other legal professionals from various states and jurisdictions. It also includes a letter that discusses a case involving Bradley Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029225.txt

The document discusses a statement by Alan Dershowitz in response to false charges made by Jane Doe #3 regarding her contacts with former President Clinton and former Vice President Gore. It mentions that additional evidence has been uncovered showing that Jane Doe #3 lied about these alleged contacts, as well as her involvement on Jeffrey Epstein's private island. The statement also discusses an elaborate fantasy that Jane Doe #3 sold to a British tabloid regarding her fictional meeting with Mr. Clinton and other individuals.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028965.txt

The document is a letter from attorney Martin G. Weinberg to John Zucker, Assistant Legal Counsel for ABC's Office of Legal Counsel, regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The lawyer represents Jeffrey Epstein and believes that the airing of the interview will be grossly negligent or worse because the accusations made by Jane Doe 3 are uncorroborated, have been refuted by other credible evidence, and were previously considered immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in a pending litigation. The lawyer also mentions that Jane Doe 3 refused to cooperate with an FBI investigation into Mr. Epstein eight years ago.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt

The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028921.txt

This document discusses a new development in a sex scandal involving Jeffrey Epstein, a South Florida billionaire money manager who was accused of running an international underage sex ring. The story has resurfaced due to the efforts of Fort Lauderdale lawyer Brad Edwards, who is representing two alleged victims identified as Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4, both of whom are claiming that well-known criminal defense lawyer Alan Dershowitz and Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, were involved in Epstein's international sex ring. Dershowitz denies these allegations. The case is currently being heard in U.S. District Court in West Palm Beach, with a focus on the alleged victims' attempt to use the Crime Victims' Rights Act to force the U.S. Department of Justice to prosecute Epstein for various offenses related to sex trafficking and prostitution.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026854.txt

The document is a civil lawsuit case number 1:16-cv-04642-RA filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein by Jane Doe, who is proceeding under a pseudonym. The complaint was filed on June 20th, 2016, and the plaintiff is represented by Thomas F. Meagher from Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg & Bovino, LLP in Princeton, NJ. The case has been assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams and seeks relief for assault, libel, and slander under a diversity jurisdiction.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022841.txt

The document is a conversation between two individuals discussing world currencies and personal relationships. The participants mention specific currencies like bitcoin, pound, kroner, franc, sfr, and dollar. They also talk about a person named Andrew and someone referred to as Jane Doe 1 and 2, who are local strippers, and the sender's former girlfriend with whom he had an affair and tried to keep her out of his mess. The sender is considering making a statement about their relationship for reasons of respect and love for his former girlfriend. The conversation also touches on reputation management and protecting one's loved ones during difficult times.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014084.txt

The document is related to a court case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 who are filing a response in opposition to a motion for leave to file a supplement to a reply in support of a motion for limited intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs claim that an affidavit submitted by Jane Doe #3 in support of an unrelated pleading does not prove anything against them, and accuse Dershowitz of hiding the truth about his activities. They also point out that Dershowitz has failed to provide specific evidence to contest Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite claiming in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations are false.

PreviousPage 2 of 2