Documents tagged "Cc"
Found 65 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031813.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing trades involving AVG° stock. Richard Kahn from HBRK Associates Inc. mentions that someone he knows is married to Broadcom and has sold 4,000 lots of puts. Paul Barrett from Alpha Group Capital LLC recommends buying $200 Aug puts due to the stock being down 16% on a deal that no one fully understands. Jeffrey E. expresses frustration with Richard Kahn's decision-making and questions his ownership of the stock at a higher price.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031809.txt
The document discusses financial strategies related to AVG° stock and puts, with multiple people offering their opinions on the best course of action. Paul Barrett is mentioned as having recommended buying $200 Aug puts earlier in the day, while Richard Kahn is identified as being married to Broadcom, which has affected his decision-making. The document also refers to Jeffrey E.'s frustration with the situation and mentions that he is at his wit's end.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031806.txt
The document contains several emails between Paul Barrett from Alpha Group Capital LLC and Jeffrey E. regarding recommendations on investing in Broadcom's stock. In the emails, Paul Barrett discusses his initial recommendation to buy $200 Aug puts due to uncertainty around a recent deal, which no one fully understands. He also mentions that he has some ideas on how to address this issue but will send them over the weekend. The CEO of Broadcom has a good track record regarding mergers and it is suggested to keep the stock and own protection for the next 35 days until more clarity is provided by management.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
The document is an email conversation between a certified paralegal and others, discussing the service of papers to individuals named Maxwell, Wexner, and Trump. The focus is on whether these individuals have been personally served or if it was someone at their location who accepted the papers on their behalf. The context of the emails suggests that this relates to a legal matter involving Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031748.txt
The document is an email chain discussing the Trump Super PAC's ads about Jeff Epstein and the Clintons. It mentions key figures such as Jeffrey Epstein, Steven Hoffenberg, and Conchita Sarnoff. The emails mention that there is a cover-up to protect both Clintons and Epstein from crimes committed against young girls, with the FBI being involved in these actions. There is also discussion about using the new book by Conchita Sarnoff in the Trump Super PAC's TV ads.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031694.txt
This document is an email chain between Peggy Siegal and Jesse Kornbluth about Jeffery Epstein. The key people in this document include Jeffrey Epstein, Peggy Siegal, Jesse Kornbluth, Annette Tapert, Joe Allen, and Bill Clinton. Key places mentioned are Palm Beach (PB) and Wall Street. The main topics discussed are the power of the rich and corporations in a democracy and their potential for social/economic change through shaming and shunning.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031691.txt
The email exchange discusses Jesse Kornbluth's opinion on rich and powerful people in the context of a Times piece about democracy. Peggy Siegal mentions her acquaintance Jeffrey Epstein and wonders if he has been shunned, despite an article stating that he is brilliant and admired by many influential people, including Woody Allen and Bill Clinton. The exchange seems to be personal and confidential between Peggy Siegal and Jesse Kornbluth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031555.txt
The document discusses a Florida shooter who was looking to kill Jews and women and always wore a Trump hat. The message also contains confidential information intended only for the addressee and warns of potential unauthorized use, disclosure or copying being strictly prohibited. It seems that there is an issue with some person named Hicks that Jeffrey E. wants Weingarten to look into.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031230.txt
The email discusses a judge allowing Steven Hoffenberg to talk with the victims of a case against Jeffrey Epstein. The communication is marked as confidential and intended only for the addressee. The sender, Darren Indyke, is from a law firm located in New York City. The email includes a message from Steven Hoffenberg, CEO of several companies, expressing his intention to file a suit against Jeff Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031203.txt
The document is an email from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein and Bennet J. Moskowitz regarding Judge Sweet's decision to allow Steven Hoffenberg to speak with the victims of the Towers victims suit against Jeffrey Epstein. The email includes personal contact information for Darren Indyke, who is a lawyer based in New York. It also contains a note stating that the information contained in the communication is confidential and intended only for the addressee.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031195.txt
The email is from Darren Indyke to Jeffrey Epstein and discusses proceedings for the attachment of all Jeff Epstein's assets in a case involving Towers Investors vs Epstein. The case appears to be related to a property on St Thomas, with Steven Hoffenberg being mentioned as CEO of New York Post Publishing INC. The email includes information about Darren Indyke's law firm and includes copyright information for 2016.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030927.txt
This document discusses the Federal Bureau of Investigation's use of "302 Reports" in their investigations and interviews with witnesses or suspects. It mentions that these reports can be problematic for both innocent and unwary individuals, as they are prepared by agents using handwritten notes rather than a tape recorder or court reporter. The document also references several recent high-profile cases involving the FBI's investigation of local government officials in Broward County, Florida.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030624.txt
The document discusses a request from The Mail on Sunday for comment regarding an article about Mr Bradley Edwards' claim against Mr Jeffrey Epstein. The topic of the article includes allegations made by Virginia Roberts and other young women who say they were underage victims of Mr Epstein, as well as claims that Mr Epstein attempted to intimidate Mr Edwards and his clients into retracting their claims. Additionally, it is mentioned that Virginia Roberts has stated her intention to testify about a sexual encounter with Prince Andrew at the age of 17, and that she was flown to London for this purpose. The article also mentions an address book containing contact information for several men who Ms Roberts says were involved in sex trafficking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030622.txt
The document is an email chain discussing a request from The Mail on Sunday for comment regarding a case involving Mr Bradley Edwards and Mr Jeffrey Epstein. It mentions the involvement of young women who allege they were underage when their encounters with Epstein took place, as well as claims by one woman that she was instructed to have sex with Prince Andrew at age 17. The article also references an address book containing contact information for other men involved in Epstein's alleged sex trafficking ring.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030384.txt
In the email exchange, Jeffrey Epstein forwards a message from Brad Wechsler discussing tax deductions related to ObamaCare and medical care. The deductions involve changes made on Friday involving $4 million of RA and Artspace losses reducing the Medicare tax by $7 million of TRA payments being exempt from medicare taxes. There is also an overpayment increase of $400,000. It is mentioned that taxes are ready to be filed electronically and a call for further discussion is suggested.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030318.txt
This document discusses a case involving Jeffrey Epstein and his connection to high-level politicians. The writer suggests that there may be an opportunity to use Epstein's relationship with former President Clinton as a way to attack the Trump administration, specifically Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta who was involved in the case. They argue that the federal government overstepped its bounds by intruding into what should have been a local matter and criticize the current backlash against those who made decisions at the time.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030315.txt
This document is an email conversation between multiple people regarding Jeffrey Epstein and a deal he made with the federal government for a previous case. The participants include Matthew Hiltzik, Michael Wolff, J (possibly Jeffrey Epstein himself), and Ken Starr. The topic of discussion centers around the public's perception of Epstein's connection to high-ranking politicians and how it might affect the narrative surrounding his case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030295.txt
The document discusses The Terramar Project, with key people such as G Maxwell and J Epstein being mentioned, along with social media platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. It also touches on topics like Pledge and the Daily Catch. Philip Barden writes about the necessity of issuing a cogent denial regarding allegations made against G Maxwell, emphasizing the importance of not remaining silent in order to maintain credibility and avoid potential legal consequences. The document highlights the need for a strong response to serious accusations to prevent them from becoming accepted as truth.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030255.txt
The email conversation discusses a possible line in an article that acknowledges Jeffrey Epstein's wrongdoing and mentions his connection to the Clintons. It also refers to his association with the Trump administration official who dealt with the case. The discussion highlights Epstein's role as a friend of former President Clinton and points out that he is connected to high levels of federal government, which could lead to anger surrounding the former president. Additionally, it references Ken Starr's critique of the resolution of a long-ago case involving Jeffrey Epstein, highlighting that his offense was quintessentially local in nature but treated as a state offense by able, honest prosecutors in Palm Beach County.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030229.txt
The email discusses the use of paid sources by journalists and refers to the PCC Code for Editors. The sender mentions Maz as a particularly devious person who can pay for information, but notes that criminals cannot sell their stories unless it is in the public interest. It also highlights a loophole where witnesses may be paid if the case involves a bent detective.