Documents tagged "Circuit"
Found 31 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00020937.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "ASIC DESIGN MANUAL" at the top. Below the title is a list of sections with headings such as "1. GENERAL," "2. SCHEMATICS," and "3. TESTING." Each section heading is followed by bullet points, which are not fully visible in the image. The document appears to be technical or instructional in nature, likely related to designing an Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). There's also a logo or emblem in the top left corner that is partially obscured, and there is some red text on the right side of the document, but it's not legible due to the angle and quality of the image.
DOJ-OGR-00020827.jpg
The image appears to be a digital scan of a document, specifically a court case file from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The document has a redacted section at the top with the text "22-142-CR" and the word "COURT" in large letters. Below that, there's more text indicating an official case number and the names of parties involved in the legal proceedings. Additional information includes details about the court, such as its address and phone numbers, which are typical for court documents to inform those involved or seeking further information on a particular case. The document is likely a formal piece of judicial administration.
DOJ-OGR-00020619.jpg
The image displays a document with the header "United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit" and the file number "21-1426(CR)." Below this, there's an appeal caption that includes various names, roles, and court references related to a legal proceeding. The text is in black on a white background and uses a formal typeface typical of official documents. The style of the image is straightforward and informational, with no images or graphics other than the text itself.
DOJ-OGR-00020610.jpg
The image shows a document from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. It appears to be a legal notice with various lines and headings such as "United States Court of Appeals," "Eleventh Circuit," "NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION," and "Motion to Dismiss." The document includes handwritten signatures at the bottom right corner. The text and details are too small to read clearly in this description, but they seem to relate to legal proceedings or a court case within the circuit court system of the United States.
DOJ-OGR-00020385.jpg
The image is a scanned document with a letterhead that reads "US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit." The document appears to be an official court notice or form. It contains printed text and seems to inform recipients about their rights to appeal, including deadlines and options available. There's also a date mentioned at the bottom: "December 14, 2006." The style of the image is a straightforward black-and-white scan with no graphical elements or images beyond the letterhead and text.
DOJ-OGR-00014733.jpg
The image shows a document with a heading that reads "United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit." The document appears to be an official court filing, possibly a docket sheet or notice. It includes text which seems to pertain to legal proceedings, such as case numbers and related matters. The style of the document is formal and bureaucratic, typical of legal documents from government agencies.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012792.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with visible text on it. It appears to be an official or formal paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or court matters, as indicated by the text "Appeal from Circuit Court" at the top left corner. The rest of the text is not entirely legible due to the angle and resolution of the image. Additionally, there are two stamps on the document with the word "Filed" visible, suggesting that this paper has been processed or received by an official entity such as a court or government department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029859.txt
The document discusses Jeffrey Epstein, a former Palm Beach resident who pleaded guilty in 2008 to two prostitution-related charges involving underage girls. It is revealed that Epstein paid three women $5.5 million to settle lawsuits related to the underage-sex allegations. The settlements were reached after years of speculation about the amount Epstein paid to his accusers. Attorneys Bradley Edwards and Jack Scarola are also mentioned in the document as representing some of the young women who sued Epstein.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023361.txt
This document is a court brief filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in relation to the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. The brief addresses dismissals for failure to state a claim and foreign sovereign immunity among other issues. Key people involved include Ronald L. Motley, Stephen A. Cozen, Carter G. Phillips, Andrea Bierstein, Robert M. Kaplan, James P. Kreindler, Jerry S. Goldman, and Chris Leonardo. The document is titled "In re: TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001" and includes a list of cases related to the attacks.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019856.txt
The U.S. Supreme Court has lowered the standard for proving insider trading involving tipping family or friends in the case of Salman v. U.S. The court held that a gift of inside information to a family or friend is sufficient to prove insider trading tipping liability, even if there is no valuable quid pro quo exchange. This narrows the previous requirement under Newman that required proof of pecuniary benefit or similarly valuable personal benefit. It will likely embolden the government to bring more similar cases as it becomes easier for them to prove a "gift" to a "friend" than a financial gain.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.