Documents tagged "Jane"
Found 36 documents with this tag
EFTA00005284-p-12.jpg
The image shows a document with multiple photographs pasted on it, each accompanied by a description or caption. The photos appear to be of various scenes and activities. Some descriptions include the names "John Doe" and "Jane Doe," which are often used as placeholders for real people in documents. The text is partially obscured and redacted, with certain sections marked with "[REDACTED]" indicating that sensitive information has been intentionally hidden or removed from view.
EFTA00001490-p-1.jpg
The image shows a piece of paper with hand-drawn diagrams and notes. The central figure is a simplified drawing of a building's layout, labeled "F1" which could stand for Floor 1. There are two distinct areas within this space, one colored in red and the other in blue, possibly indicating separate rooms or zones. On the right side of the paper, there appears to be text with some lines crossed out, but it's not entirely clear what the content is due to the angle and quality of the image. The text might include words such as "together", "inside", and possibly a name like "Jane". There are also various annotations and markings throughout the paper that seem to be related to measurements or adjustments made during a planning process. The top left corner of the image contains additional text which is not entirely visible but may include references to specific areas or instructions for use of the drawing. The overall style of the image suggests it could be a part of architectural or construction plans, with emphasis on spatial arrangement and possibly budgeting or material requirements, given the annotations present.
DOJ-OGR-00007357.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document, specifically an email message with some details redacted. The visible portions show that the sender's name is "Jane Smith" and the recipient's email address has been blocked out. In the subject line, we can see the words "Re: Meeting Scheduling Request - November 17th". The text of the message itself is partially obscured, but it seems to be a typical business communication discussing meeting arrangements or updates. The quality of the image and the resolution suggest that it might have been taken with a camera or scanner focused on the document, rather than being photographed in its actual environment.
DOJ-OGR-00007051.jpg
The image is a scanned document, likely a letter or official correspondence, with various texts and structures that can be inferred from its content. The title "Law Office of Bobbie C. Sterna" suggests it comes from a legal practice. Dates such as "November 30, 2017" indicate the time frame related to the document. There's mention of "Mrs. Mary Jane Smith," which could be the recipient or someone else mentioned in the text. The text includes references to government matters and is signed off with a personal name, though it's not clear due to the image quality.
DOJ-OGR-00021136.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of a document with legal content. The text is mostly redacted, but there are some words and phrases that are not obscured. These include references to "New York State Court" and "the Appellate Division, First Department." There's also mention of a case involving an individual named "Jane Doe," with the context suggesting it could be related to a sexual assault or harassment case. The document is titled "DECISION OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT," and there are footnotes at the bottom of the page. Additionally, the date "January 2017" is visible, indicating when this decision was made.
DOJ-OGR-00008870.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois" and a subheading "Honorable Harry D. Leinenweber" at the top. Below this, there is a list titled "Plaintiffs' Witness List" which includes names such as "Jane Doe" and other fictitious names often used in court documents to protect privacy. The document has visible redactions, with lines drawn through certain parts of the text, likely to obscure sensitive information or details that are not meant to be shared publicly. The background is a standard white paper, and there's no additional context provided beyond what can be read from the text on the document itself.
DOJ-OGR-00008862.jpg
The image is a scan of an official document with various pieces of information and text. At the top right corner, there's a redacted section that indicates it could be related to a case or file number, but specific details are obscured for privacy. The main body of text includes phrases such as "Re: Letter Dated April 15," which suggests that this document is in response to a communication from an earlier date. There's also mention of "Ms. Jane Smith" and her home address in New York City, indicating she might be the recipient or subject of the letter. The text is formal and structured, typical of legal or administrative correspondence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028785.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document titled "Seminar Power." The text on the document appears to be a list with names and associated roles or descriptions. Specifically, there are three entries: one for Dr. Bill Miller, another for Michael Cohen, and the third for Jim Smith. The third entry includes a subtitle that says "Jane Doe [Female Speaker]" followed by "Jon Doe [Male Speaker]." At the bottom of the image, there is additional text that seems to provide information about accommodations; it reads: "Accommodations will be available for individuals with disabilities upon request. Please contact John Smith at least 14 days in advance to ensure availability." The document has a formal layout and style typical for official or professional correspondence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033508.txt
The document appears to be a series of emails between Jessica Cadwell and Jacquie Johnson regarding a case involving someone named Jane Doe. The conversation includes topics such as the scheduling of depositions for Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Trump, service on Maxwell, and an emergency protective order. It is not clear from this summary who Mr. Trump or Ms. Maxwell are, but they may be parties involved in the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033503.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of service on two individuals named Maxwell and Trump, who are likely defendants in a legal case. The names are redacted to maintain confidentiality. The emails also reference Jane Doe as a plaintiff or witness in the case. Jacquie Johnson appears to be a paralegal at Burman Critton Lutier & Coleman, and Jessica Cadwell is another individual involved in the discussion. The content of the emails suggests that efforts are being made to obtain information from these individuals for legal purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033498.txt
The document is a series of emails discussing the status of legal proceedings involving a person named Jane Doe and another individual. Key people in the conversation include Jessica Cadwell, Jeffrey Epstein, Jacquie Johnson, and Maxwell. The conversations take place between August 11 and 12, 2009, and refer to efforts to serve legal documents on various individuals involved in the case. The location of these emails is West Palm Beach, FL.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032892.txt
The email conversation involves several people discussing an inquiry from the WSJ about a Jane Doe case involving Trump and Epstein. The email chain includes Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Darren Indyke, Joe Palazzolo, a staff reporter at the WSJ, and Jeffrey E. Jeevacation@gmail.com. It appears that they are discussing how to respond to the inquiry from the WSJ regarding the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.txt
This document is from a court case where Jane Doe is suing Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual assault that occurred in the mid-1990s. The initial status conference has been scheduled for December 16, 2016, and both parties are required to submit a joint letter providing information on the nature of the case, jurisdiction, venue, prior settlement discussions, and estimated trial length, among other things. The document is an order and notice from Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032306.txt
The document discusses an inquiry from the WSJ regarding a case in SDNY involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. The conversation includes several individuals, including Michael Miller from Steptoe & Johnson LLP, Jeffrey E., and Darren Indyke. They are all discussing deadlines and the need for comments on behalf of Epstein. It appears to be a sensitive legal matter, as indicated by the frequent use of phrases like "privileged" and "confidential information."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032304.txt
This document is a forwarded email chain regarding an inquiry from The Wall Street Journal about a case involving Mr. Trump and Mr. Epstein. Michael C. Miller, a partner at Steptoe & Johnson LLP, has been CC'd on the emails as he is likely to be involved in responding to the WSJ's inquiries. Joseph Palazzolo, a staff reporter from The Wall Street Journal, is asking for a comment on behalf of Mr. Epstein and expects to have the story online within a couple of hours.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
The document is an email conversation between a certified paralegal and others, discussing the service of papers to individuals named Maxwell, Wexner, and Trump. The focus is on whether these individuals have been personally served or if it was someone at their location who accepted the papers on their behalf. The context of the emails suggests that this relates to a legal matter involving Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031708.txt
The document discusses a rape lawsuit filed against Donald Trump, which has been refiled with new witness information. The case involves accusations of sexual assault by Jane Doe. The response from the Trump team is mentioned in the document. The topic appears to be related to high-profile legal cases and their impacts on public figures like Donald Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031198.txt
The document discusses a woman identified as Katie Johnson who has filed multiple rape cases against Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. The cases have been filed in different courts and the plaintiff is seeking representation from lawyers in California, Atlanta, and Florida. In one of the new cases filed in New York City, the respondent is only referred to as Tiffany Doe and she claims that she was raped by Trump and Epstein at a party hosted by Epstein when she was 13 years old.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031186.txt
A woman is accusing Donald Trump of raping her when she was 13 years old during a series of sex parties hosted by alleged billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein in 1994. She filed a lawsuit against him in Manhattan Supreme Court in June and will speak at a press conference in Los Angeles to break her silence on the allegations. The Trump campaign has denied the accusations, calling them "categorically untrue" and politically motivated.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030347.txt
The document discusses a legal case involving Jane Doe and Donald Trump, among others. The case was voluntarily dismissed against all defendants according to a notice of voluntary dismissal filed by Meagher, Thomas on November 4th, 2016. The communication is confidential and intended only for the addressee, with unauthorized use or disclosure being strictly prohibited.