Documents tagged "Texas"
Found 25 documents with this tag
EFTA00008585-p-11.jpg
The image is a scanned document with various sections of information redacted, likely to protect sensitive data. The page number "11" is visible at the top right corner. The handwriting suggests that the notes are from an interview or conversation, with questions and answers related to phone calls in New York. There are also references to locations such as "Florida" and "Texas". Some text has been redacted with black lines across it, obscuring details like names, numbers, and possibly specific inquiries about phone conversations. The image conveys a sense of organized information gathering or reporting.
EFTA00000192-p-1.jpg
The image shows an indoor setting with a focus on two pieces of paper pinned to what appears to be a temporary wall construction. The top piece of paper displays a large "T" and the bottom one has smaller text that is not clearly legible in this description. To the right, there's part of a blue plastic barrier or tarp, which may be used for insulation or protection from debris. On the bottom left corner of the image, there's a watermark or logo with the date "ETX 2015," suggesting that the photo was taken in East Texas during the year 2015.
DOJ-OGR-00007412.jpg
The image is a scanned document with several lines of text. At the top right corner, there's an emblem that resembles the United States government seal. The document appears to be related to a legal case as indicated by phrases such as "United States District Court for the Western District of Texas" and references to court dockets and documents. The specific content of the text is not fully legible due to the resolution and angle of the scan, but it seems to include details about a trial or hearing in a federal court.
DOJ-OGR-00007292.jpg
The image appears to be a digital document with printed text and what seems to be the outline of an envelope on the left side. The text is somewhat blurred but it includes phrases such as "page number" and "date," suggesting that this might be a page from a larger report or article. There are also mentions of locations like "December 2015," "Aspen, Colorado," and "Dallas, Texas." The document seems to be formal in nature, possibly related to legal proceedings, given the context provided by the visible text.
DOJ-OGR-00007200.jpg
The image displays a document with a printed page of legal text. The content appears to be from a court proceeding or legal case, as indicated by the heading "United States District Court for the Western District of Texas" followed by a docket number and case name. There is a redacted section where personal information is likely protected. Below that are numbered paragraphs containing more text which seems to describe procedural matters or legal arguments related to the case. The style of the document is formal and typographic, typical of official legal documents.
DOJ-OGR-00006684.jpg
The image displays a scanned document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The document contains details such as case numbers, titles, and names associated with court actions. It includes information about a hearing scheduled on March 31st in room C-204 at the federal courthouse in Amarillo. The background is primarily textured white, indicating that this might be an internal or official document rather than something intended for public viewing.
DOJ-OGR-00006139.jpg
The image is a scanned document with red highlighting and annotations on it. The highlighted text refers to legal proceedings involving the U.S. government, specifically the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas. There are lines drawn around paragraphs in the document that have been marked, indicating specific points of interest or importance. The document appears to be related to a case or legal matter and is possibly a court record or written brief.
DOJ-OGR-00021942.jpg
The image displays a form titled "U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas" with various sections containing checkboxes and instructions related to court procedures. There is text indicating that this is an official document from the federal judicial system, specifically for a district court within Texas. The visible part of the form includes options for parties to select if they are seeking relief or have filed certain types of documents in the case. However, due to the resolution and angle of the image, specific details such as names, case numbers, and other personal or sensitive information may not be clearly readable.
DOJ-OGR-00021824.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document titled "United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit". The top right corner features a barcode with numbers beneath it, likely for tracking purposes. Below the title, there's a section labeled "Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas", indicating the origin of the appeal. The document appears to be an official court filing, possibly related to a legal case appealed to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. It includes details such as a case number and sections titled 'Docketed' and 'Filed' with corresponding dates.
DOJ-OGR-00021299.jpg
The image is of a printed document with text that appears to be related to legal proceedings. The visible text mentions "United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas" and includes references to "Plaintiff" and "Defendants." It also refers to the filing of an amended complaint and the scheduling of a case management conference. There are no people, locations, or significant objects besides the text in the image. The document is presented on a piece of paper with lines that indicate a formal structure for legal documentation.
DOJ-OGR-00020589.jpg
The image displays a document with visible text and sections. At the top of the page, there is a date "December 2016" and a location indicator that reads "Austin, Texas." Below this information, there's a title or section heading that says "COURT OF APPEALS." The central part of the document contains text which appears to be related to legal proceedings or case details. It includes various checkboxes with accompanying text such as "Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment," suggesting a list of options or responses related to court actions. The text is too small and blurry to read in detail. The overall appearance of the document suggests it might be from a legal case file, possibly a motion filed within a court system. The style of the image is that of a standard photograph taken of a physical piece of paper.
DOJ-OGR-00005904.jpg
The image is a screenshot of an email with the subject line "RE: RE: DRAFT HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS" and a timestamp at the top indicating it was sent on October 19, 2017. The email body contains text that appears to be discussing or debating some points related to hillside development regulations. There is a mention of a specific section (Section 15) within these regulations. The sender's address ends with "@utdallas.edu," suggesting the sender is affiliated with the University of Texas at Dallas. The text in the image is clear and legible but does not provide any further personal or identifying details about the sender or recipient(s) of the email.
DOJ-OGR-00008860.jpg
The image appears to be a scanned document with a low resolution, making some details difficult to discern. The visible part of the text seems to contain legal jargon or references, possibly related to a court case or official proceeding. It includes phrases such as "THE STATE OF" and "COUNTY COURT AT LAW #3," which suggest that this document is associated with a Texas county court system. There are also names mentioned in the text, but due to the low resolution, it's challenging to provide further details about their identities or roles in the context of this document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028662.jpg
The image appears to be a photograph of a printed document with text on it. The document is titled "The Scientist" and includes the name "Dr. John Smith." It discusses topics related to science and technology, specifically mentioning NASA, space exploration, and potentially other relevant organizations such as NOAA and the University of Hawaii. There are several paragraphs of text visible, but due to the angle and quality of the photo, it's not possible to provide a detailed description of all the text. The document also mentions various dates and locations, such as "July 17th," "Hawaii," and "Mission Control in Houston, Texas." The overall style of the image is informational, likely meant for educational or professional purposes.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033255.txt
The document is a message from Dylan Love to Jeffrey Epstein discussing his professional background and recent writing, including articles on virtual reality, instant translation technology, Russian influence in elections, quantum technologies, and transhumanist presidential candidate Zoltan Istvan. The writer also suggests an idea for a story involving Epstein's thoughts on cryptocurrency and financial corruption.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033175.txt
The document presents an update on the US Presidential Election performance of candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton. It states that since the start of the second presidential debate, 3.1 million tweets have been processed. The positive, neutral, and negative percentages for each candidate are provided, as well as their winning chances. Additionally, the winning chances in various US states are highlighted for both candidates.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_033171.txt
This document is an email exchange between Zubair Khan and Jeffrey E. about US election updates. Zubair has processed tweets related to the presidential debate and found that Clinton's popularity has increased with 62% support, while Trump has huge support in Ohio and New Jersey. Clinton is likely to win in New York, California, and Michigan.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032324.txt
This document summarizes the performance of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the US election based on captured tweets from November 1st. The chances of winning for both candidates are listed, as well as their respective chances of winning in various US states.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032281.txt
The report presents data on the presidential election, analyzing tweets about Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton from September. Trump's negative impressions were high, especially in Florida, while his positive impression was high in New York. On the other hand, Hillary Clinton received more negative impressions than positive ones, with California being her most popular state for positive impressions. The data shows a significant discrepancy between the two candidates' approval ratings across different states in the US.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031990.txt
The email discusses Ken Starr's role as President of Baylor University and his efforts to raise the academic stature of the school. It highlights that Starr, who is well-known for his role in Bill Clinton's Whitewater scandal, is receiving high marks for his new position at the nation's largest Baptist institution. The email also includes links to other news stories on topics such as the healing powers of vinegar and curing blood pressure without drugs.