Documents tagged "Alan"
Found 68 documents with this tag
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021824.txt
This document is a rough draft transcript of the deposition in the case of Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell versus Alan M. Dershowitz. The key people involved are the attorneys for the parties, including Jack Scarola representing Edwards and Cassell, Sigrid McCawley representing Virginia Roberts from Boies Schiller & Flexner, and Joni Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. The deposition is being held at a location in Fort Lauderdale, Florida on October 16th, 2015.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017796.txt
The document appears to be a court filing in Case 1:19-cv-03377, with Exhibit 2 detailing the response of Alan Dershowitz to a report by Raw Story. The case involves allegations made against Dershowitz, but it's unclear from the provided information what the specific details are. The focus is on the key people involved in this court case and their interactions with media outlets.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017787.txt
The document is a court exhibit related to Case 1:19-cv-03377, filed on April 16, 2019. It references the Twitter handle of Alan Dershowitz, who appears to be an important figure in the case. The main topics discussed in the document are not visible in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015675.txt
Alan Turing invented the computer and helped win World War II by breaking the Enigma code. He left us with one of the greatest puzzles of our time: are humans simply computers or more than that? Many scientists think we have a tenuous hold on being the most intelligent beings on the planet and that it's just a matter of time before computers become smarter than us. This book charts a journey through the science of information, from the origins of language and logic to the frontiers of modern physics. The author, James Tagg, is an inventor and entrepreneur who has founded several companies and holds numerous patents.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.txt
The document is a response from Virginia Giuffre in a court case where Alan Dershowitz has asked for clarification or relief from a confidentiality order regarding her deposition. The deposition contains sensitive information about Giuffre's experiences as a minor victim of sexual trafficking, and she supports the confidential nature of the deposition being provided to law enforcement to investigate the crimes committed against her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014084.txt
The document is related to a court case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 who are filing a response in opposition to a motion for leave to file a supplement to a reply in support of a motion for limited intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs claim that an affidavit submitted by Jane Doe #3 in support of an unrelated pleading does not prove anything against them, and accuse Dershowitz of hiding the truth about his activities. They also point out that Dershowitz has failed to provide specific evidence to contest Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite claiming in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations are false.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.