Documents tagged "Filed"
Found 40 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00014735.jpg
The image shows a page of text, which appears to be an official document, possibly from the court system. At the top of the page, there is a header with various pieces of information such as "Case 1:17-cv-00869-JTM Document 12 Filed 03/06/18 Page 4 of 5." The main body of text includes what seems to be a legal opinion or decision, which is redacted in places where personal information or sensitive details might be present. The document uses standard formatting with numbered lines and paragraph breaks. There are no visible images, people, or specific locations described in the visible portion of the text.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012792.jpg
The image is a photograph of a printed document with visible text on it. It appears to be an official or formal paper, possibly related to legal proceedings or court matters, as indicated by the text "Appeal from Circuit Court" at the top left corner. The rest of the text is not entirely legible due to the angle and resolution of the image. Additionally, there are two stamps on the document with the word "Filed" visible, suggesting that this paper has been processed or received by an official entity such as a court or government department.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032321.txt
This document is from a court case where Jane Doe is suing Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein for alleged sexual assault that occurred in the mid-1990s. The initial status conference has been scheduled for December 16, 2016, and both parties are required to submit a joint letter providing information on the nature of the case, jurisdiction, venue, prior settlement discussions, and estimated trial length, among other things. The document is an order and notice from Ronnie Abrams, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029416.txt
Radar Online LLC is suing the Federal Bureau of Investigation for not releasing records related to its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleging that the FBI has withheld these records despite a properly filed Freedom of Information Act request. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet based in New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029405.txt
The document is a complaint filed by Radar Online LLC against the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. The complaint seeks to compel the FBI to produce records concerning its investigation and prosecution of financier Jeffrey Edward Epstein for sexually trafficking underage women. Radar Online LLC is an online investigative news outlet, while the FBI is a component of the Department of Justice. The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B), with venue being appropriate under 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(4)(B) as Radar's principal place of business is New York City.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029257.txt
The document is a court case titled Case 5:16-cv-00797-DMG-KS. It appears to be a complaint filed on April 26, 2016. However, the document itself is not visible in the image provided. Therefore, it is not possible to summarize the content of the document or identify key people, places, and topics based solely on the information given.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026854.txt
The document is a civil lawsuit case number 1:16-cv-04642-RA filed in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein by Jane Doe, who is proceeding under a pseudonym. The complaint was filed on June 20th, 2016, and the plaintiff is represented by Thomas F. Meagher from Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg & Bovino, LLP in Princeton, NJ. The case has been assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams and seeks relief for assault, libel, and slander under a diversity jurisdiction.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
This is a message exchange between Sean Bannon, Steve Bannon, and Jeffrey E. discussing the article by Thomas D. Williams about German media admitting they underestimated Steve Bannon who continues to energize anti-establishment populist base in Europe despite their dislike for his aims. The article highlights how mainstream media now admires his abilities after he left White House and Breitbart News.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025520.txt
The document discusses Steve Bannon's tour of Europe and the mainstream media's admiration for his abilities despite their dislike of his aims. The German weekly Stern acknowledges that Bannon could give a common ideology and rhetoric to the fragmented right in Europe. Despite initial thoughts that his reign had ended, the writer recognizes Bannon's potential as "dangerous" and emphasizes the respect he has earned among his audience.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025517.txt
The document focuses on Steve Bannon and his tour in Europe. The German media has acknowledged that they underestimated Bannon's abilities, despite their dislike of his aims. Bannon continues to energize the anti-establishment populist base as he moves through Europe. The mainstream media cannot help but admire his abilities, even if they do not like his goals.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024302.txt
The document appears to be a proxy statement from Carvana Co., an auto dealer company based in Tempe, AZ. The document is required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. It contains information about key people, places, and topics related to the company's operations, governance structure, and financial performance. It also includes details of any proposed transactions or changes in control that shareholders should be aware of before making their voting decisions at an upcoming annual meeting.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017796.txt
The document appears to be a court filing in Case 1:19-cv-03377, with Exhibit 2 detailing the response of Alan Dershowitz to a report by Raw Story. The case involves allegations made against Dershowitz, but it's unclear from the provided information what the specific details are. The focus is on the key people involved in this court case and their interactions with media outlets.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017789.txt
The document is related to a legal case (Case 1:19-cv-03377) and contains an exhibit labeled "Exhibit 5". The exhibit discusses the topic of the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction, which was filed on April 16, 2019. The key person mentioned in the document is the plaintiff in the case. There are no specific places or topics highlighted in the given context.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017787.txt
The document is a court exhibit related to Case 1:19-cv-03377, filed on April 16, 2019. It references the Twitter handle of Alan Dershowitz, who appears to be an important figure in the case. The main topics discussed in the document are not visible in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016197.txt
The document is a legal case involving two parties, referred to as "Plaintiffs" and "Defendants." The Plaintiffs are suing the Defendants for alleged fraudulent practices related to a financial transaction. The key topics include a dispute over the value of assets involved in the transaction, claims of misrepresentation by the Defendants, and a request from the Plaintiffs for damages and other relief. The document is part of the ongoing legal proceedings, providing further details on the case.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.txt
The document is a response from Virginia Giuffre in a court case where Alan Dershowitz has asked for clarification or relief from a confidentiality order regarding her deposition. The deposition contains sensitive information about Giuffre's experiences as a minor victim of sexual trafficking, and she supports the confidential nature of the deposition being provided to law enforcement to investigate the crimes committed against her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788.txt
Error: HTTPConnectionPool(host='localhost', port=11434): Read timed out. (read timeout=60)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014037.txt
The article discusses whether crime victims should have rights during criminal investigations, focusing on the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) and its applicability before criminal charges are filed. The authors argue that if victims do not have rights during investigations, many will never receive any protection or support from the legal system. They also address a recent memorandum by the Justice Department contending that the CVRA does not extend rights to crime victims until formal charges are filed. The article is published in the Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, with authors Paul G. Cassell, Nathanael J. Mitchell, and Bradley J. Edwards.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.