Documents tagged "filing"
Found 10 documents with this tag
EFTA00001207-p-1.jpg
The image shows a storage area filled with various items, predominantly large black filing cabinets. Some of these cabinets have yellow labels attached to them. In addition to the filing cabinets, there is a cardboard box and what appears to be a sectional sofa with cushions on top. The room has an industrial feel, with a concrete floor and white walls that are partially obscured by other objects. There is no visible text or any identifiable people in this photo.
EFTA00001182-p-1.jpg
The image shows an indoor setting with a focus on storage solutions. There are several white filing cabinets stacked up against the wall, and some of them appear to be covered in dust, indicating they have not been used recently. On top of these filing cabinets, there is a dark-colored briefcase or toolbox, which stands out due to its color compared to the white cabinets. The walls are painted in a light shade, possibly cream or off-white, and the lighting suggests it could be an office environment. There are no visible texts, people, or other significant objects that can be confidently identified within this context.
DOJ-OGR-00021779.jpg
The image shows a document with a formal structure and layout. At the top of the page, there is red text which appears to be an address followed by a date "Feb 15, 2017" in black font. Below this header section, on the left side, there is a column with bold headings such as "File No." and "Filing Date," but the details are not fully legible due to the resolution of the image. On the right side, there is a section titled "Nature of Business Activity," with some text that is difficult to read clearly. The overall style of the document suggests it could be related to business or legal matters.
DOJ-OGR-00020506.jpg
The image shows a document with printed text and various items of information listed in a structured format. The style of the document appears to be informational or procedural, possibly related to an official institution or organization given the presence of form fields such as "Docket No." and "Filing Date." At the top right corner, there's a barcode, which suggests that the document is meant for tracking or processing by electronic systems. The text within the document includes numbers, dates, and other data points, but without a higher resolution image or clearer context, it is difficult to provide more specific details about its content.
DOJ-OGR-00020490.jpg
The image is a photograph of an official document with printed text. The text at the top reads "CIVIL DIVISION" followed by some numbers and a date that are partially obscured. There's mention of a case number and another piece of information related to the court or case proceedings. A section titled "Filing Date" is visible, although the actual date is not fully shown in the image. The style of the document appears to be formal and structured, typical for legal paperwork.
DOJ-OGR-00008772.jpg
The image is a digital copy of an official document, possibly a statute or law text from the United States government. The document's title at the top reads "29 U.S. Code § 138 - Filing of action by employee when employer not subject to liability for damages" and below that, it says "Page 5." There are numbered paragraphs visible in the text, including sections like "(b) Effect on civil actions," indicating a legal framework or procedure. The font is consistent with typical government documents, employing a serif typeface for readability.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032897.txt
The document is an email notification regarding a notice of voluntary dismissal in case number 1:16-cv-07673-RA "Doe v. Trump et al" filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiff, Jane Doe, has voluntarily dismissed her lawsuit against all defendants pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It appears that this case involves some sort of controversy or conflict involving Donald Trump and/or his associates, but the specific details are not provided in this summary.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.txt
The document is a response from Virginia Giuffre in a court case where Alan Dershowitz has asked for clarification or relief from a confidentiality order regarding her deposition. The deposition contains sensitive information about Giuffre's experiences as a minor victim of sexual trafficking, and she supports the confidential nature of the deposition being provided to law enforcement to investigate the crimes committed against her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.