Documents tagged "Motion"
Found 95 documents with this tag
DOJ-OGR-00014718.jpg
The image displays a page from what appears to be a legal document, specifically an "Order on Motion" in a court case. The text is primarily composed of legalese and specific legal terms such as "defendant," "plaintiff," "motion," and "order." At the top of the page, there's a header containing various numbers and codes that likely pertain to the case number and docket information. The text is dense with multiple paragraphs, each discussing different aspects of the legal proceedings or arguments made by the parties involved. The document is structured with headings and numbered paragraphs, indicating its formal nature and importance within the court system.
DOJ-OGR-00014603.jpg
The image appears to be a screenshot of a computer screen displaying a document with legal content. The document is numbered "29" at the top and includes text that refers to a court case involving "Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint," as indicated by the visible words in the text. Additionally, there are phrases like "Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint," "motion is granted," and "in good faith," which suggests that the document contains legal arguments or orders related to a civil lawsuit. The font is typical of legal documents, with a formal appearance, and the text is aligned on both sides, indicating it may be a printed or scanned court document.
DOJ-OGR-00014531.jpg
The image displays a blurred document with lines of printed text. The quality is low, making it difficult to read the details. However, one can discern that there are multiple paragraphs and some words such as "December" and "communication." The document appears to be an official or formal type of text, possibly related to a court proceeding, given the presence of a numbered section labeled '16' with the subheading "Plaintiff's Motion for Protective Order." The background is indistinct but suggests that this might have been taken from a physical document placed on top of another surface or possibly a computer screen displaying the text.
DOJ-OGR-00008781.jpg
The image shows a document with the title "Case Number: 15-06217 Document No. 481" and appears to be from a legal proceeding such as a lawsuit. The visible text includes phrases like "Judge's Order," "Defendant's Motion," and "Plaintiff's Response," suggesting that it is related to court orders and motions filed by parties in the case. The style of the document resembles a standard legal pleading or order, with numbered paragraphs, headers, and footers. The page number at the bottom indicates this is Page 10 of a longer document.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031791.txt
The document is an email conversation between a certified paralegal and others, discussing the service of papers to individuals named Maxwell, Wexner, and Trump. The focus is on whether these individuals have been personally served or if it was someone at their location who accepted the papers on their behalf. The context of the emails suggests that this relates to a legal matter involving Jane Doe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031118.txt
The document discusses an Oscar diary written by Peggy Siegalli, which describes her experiences attending the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences' ticket pick-up for the 85th Oscar telecast. She mentions notable people such as Norman Jewison, Steven Spielberg, Tom Cruise, Paula Wagner, Jessica Chastain, and Harvey Weinstein. The document also references a party hosted by Jeffrey Katzenberg and discusses various topics related to Hollywood, including film awards and actors' chances of winning Oscars.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030626.txt
This document discusses a motion to unseal appeal briefs related to Jeffrey Epstein. The motion was filed by John Browning from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP and has received responses from several people including Martin G. Weinberg, Alan Dershowitz, Darren Indyke, Ken Starr, Kathy Ruemmler, and Kimberly Homan. The case involves sensitive information that is subject to attorney-client privilege and confidentiality.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_030156.txt
The Washington Post discusses David Ignatius's article about avoiding a summer of blood in Afghanistan by embracing a political settlement. Project Syndicate features Prince El Hassan bin Talal's analysis on the Middle East's slow-motion revolution, and Stratfor talks about Turkey's inevitable problems with neighbors. Agence Global reports on Syria's defiant President Bashar al-s, Foreign Policy In Focus examines Egypt's evolving foreign policy, and Foreign Affairs explains how Fatah-Hamas unity threatens U.S. funding. TIME explores why the Muslim Brotherhood may be Egypt's best democrats.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028928.txt
The document is a letter from Martin G. Weinberg, P.C. to John Zucker of the Office of Legal Counsel regarding an upcoming interview with Jane Doe 3 on Good Morning America and Night Line. The author represents Jeffrey Epstein and expresses concern about the potential broadcast of accusations made by Jane Doe 3, who is known in court papers as Jane Doe 3.1 Weinberg argues that ABC's publication of Jane Doe 3's accusations would be grossly negligent or worse, as they are uncorroborated allegations from over a decade ago that have been refuted by other evidence and were deemed immaterial and impertinent by a federal judge in ongoing litigation.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019465.txt
Peggy Siegal is writing an Oscar diary and discussing her experiences with Academy events, award ceremonies, and social interactions in Hollywood. She mentions the Dreamworks studio's "Lincoln" campaign, Steven Spielberg, Jessica Chastain's "The Heiress", Tom Cruise's ex-agent turned Broadway producer Paula Wagner, Harvey Weinstein's concern about Emmanuelle Riva's last minute surge, and her conversations with various industry professionals. She also expresses her sleep deprivation and jet lag from traveling for the events.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015650.txt
The document is a response from Virginia Giuffre in a court case where Alan Dershowitz has asked for clarification or relief from a confidentiality order regarding her deposition. The deposition contains sensitive information about Giuffre's experiences as a minor victim of sexual trafficking, and she supports the confidential nature of the deposition being provided to law enforcement to investigate the crimes committed against her.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015590.txt
This document is a legal filing in the case of BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, PAUL G. CASSELL vs ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ in the Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. The defendant Alan M. Dershowitz has filed a motion to modify a confidentiality order to allow him to use testimony from a non-party witness named Virginia Roberts Giuffre as part of his defense strategy in the case. He argues that this is necessary for due process and fairness.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014788.txt
Error: HTTPConnectionPool(host='localhost', port=11434): Read timed out. (read timeout=60)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014084.txt
The document is related to a court case involving Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 who are filing a response in opposition to a motion for leave to file a supplement to a reply in support of a motion for limited intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz. The plaintiffs claim that an affidavit submitted by Jane Doe #3 in support of an unrelated pleading does not prove anything against them, and accuse Dershowitz of hiding the truth about his activities. They also point out that Dershowitz has failed to provide specific evidence to contest Jane Doe #3's allegations that he sexually molested her, despite claiming in the media that he has irrefutable proof that her allegations are false.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010757.txt
The document is a legal filing regarding the case Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell vs Alan M. Dershowitz in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida. The plaintiffs/counterclaim defendants are responding to Dershowitz's motion to determine the confidentiality of certain court records related to allegations made by Virginia Giuffre that she was sexually abused by Dershowitz. The filing argues that the court records in question should not be considered confidential because they support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre and establish a strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. The plaintiffs also note that the records have never been found to be "confidential" by any other court and that Dershowitz has referred to them in media interviews and pleadings before this Court, which implies that he wants "everything to be made public" and implied that Edwards and Cassell had something to hide. The filing goes on to discuss the legal principles governing the sealing of court records, including the presumption of openness and the heavy burden placed on the party seeking closure. The plaintiffs argue that Dershowitz has failed to carry this burden and request that the court deny his motion in its entirety.